Skip to main content
Why HTML? Back to Abstract Download PDF
License: arXiv.org perpetual non-exclusive license
arXiv:2603.13564v1 [math.OA] 13 Mar 2026

The MF property for amalgamated free products

Tatiana Shulman
Abstract

A C*-algebra (or a group) is called MF (matricial field) if it admits finite dimensional approximate unitary representations which are approximately injective, where approximately is meant with respect to the operator norm.

It is proved that for any MF C*-algebra AA and its C*-subalgebra CC, Aβˆ—CAA\ast_{C}A is MF. For general amalgamated free products, Aβˆ—CBA\ast_{C}B, a necessary and sufficient condition for being MF is given. It is shown that the following groups – amalgamated free products of amenable groups, semidirect products of amenable groups by free groups, and β„€2β‹ŠS​L2​(β„€)\mathbb{Z}^{2}\rtimes SL_{2}(\mathbb{Z}) – all have MF full group C*-algebra. It is shown that the class of MF C*-algebras is closed under maximal tensor products with Cβˆ—β€‹(𝔽n)C^{*}(\mathbb{F}_{n}). We also show that for any Hilbert-Schmidt stable C*-algebra AA and any its C*-subalgebra CC, all hyperlinear traces on Aβˆ—CAA\ast_{C}A are MF.

1 Introduction

Three approximation conjectures for groups – the sofic conjecture, the Connes Embedding conjecture for groups, and the MF-conjecture – state that every countable group can be approximated by ”nice” ones, namely by the permutation groups S​y​m​(n)Sym(n) and by the unitary groups 𝒰⁑(n)\mathcal{U}(n) of nΓ—nn\times n matrices.

More specifically, the MF conjecture states that every countable group is MF, meaning that there is an approximate representation Ο•n:G→𝒰⁑(n)\phi_{n}\colon G\to\mathcal{U}(n) which is separating in the sense that β€–Ο•n​(g)βˆ’1nβ€–\|\phi_{n}(g)-1_{n}\| is bounded away from zero for all gβ‰ 1Gg\neq 1_{G}.

The Connes Embedding conjecture for groups (as well as the sofic conjecture) is formulated similarly, by replacing the operator norm by the normalized Hilbert-Schmidt norm (by replacing 𝒰⁑(n)\mathcal{U}(n) by S​y​m​(n)Sym(n) and the operator norm by the Hamming distance, respectively).

Not so much is known about MF groups. Amenable groups – which had long been known to be sofic and hyperlinear – were shown to be MF only relatively recently in the breakthrough paper [30].

MF groups were introduced in [6] as a group-theoretic analogue of MF C*-algebras. The latter are C*-algebras that can be approximated, in an appropriate sense, by finite-dimensional ones. For C*-algebras, the MF property is closely related to several other important properties: it is implied by quasidiagonality and, in turn, implies stable finiteness. It also has an interesting connection with the Ext semigroup of Brown, Douglas and Fillmore (see e.g. [10]).

Since a discrete group GG embeds into Cβˆ—β€‹(G)C^{*}(G) and Crβˆ—β€‹(G)C^{*}_{r}(G), there is the following connection between the C*-algebraic MF property and the group theoretic one: if either Cβˆ—β€‹(G)C^{*}(G) or Crβˆ—β€‹(G)C^{*}_{r}(G) is MF, so is GG.

There are no examples of groups whose full or reduced C*-algebra is not MF, and at the same time there are not so many examples of non-amenable groups whose C*-algebras are known to be MF, at least in the case of full group C*-algebras.

In the reduced case, Crβˆ—β€‹(𝔽2)C^{*}_{r}(\mathbb{F}_{2}) is MF by the Haagerup and Thorbjornsen theorem [10], and new very interesting examples are found recently – see [23] and references therein.

The main source of groups with MF full C*-algebras is the class of amenable groups ([30]) and the class of groups with residually finite dimensional full group C*-algebras (see e.g. [18], [29] and [28] for examples of such). Outside those classes, it is not clear when full group C*-algebras are MF or at least stably finite.

There are however some constructions that preserve the MF property of C*-algebras. Hadwin, Li and Shen proved that free products of MF C*-algebras are MF [11]. Later Li and Shen discovered that if AA is a separable MF C*-algebra and FF is its finite-dimensional C*-subalgebra, then Aβˆ—FAA\ast_{F}A is MF. We prove here that in fact the amalgamated C*-subalgebra can be arbitrary.

Theorem (Th. 10) Let AA be a separable MF C*-algebra and let CC be any C*-subalgebra of AA. Then Aβˆ—CAA\ast_{C}A is MF.

In particular, we conclude that if GG is an MF group, then any its double, Gβˆ—HGG\ast_{H}G, is MF.

For amalgamated free products Aβˆ—FBA\ast_{F}B, where AA and BB are separable C*-algebras and FF is their common finite-dimensional C*-subalgebra, Li and Shen found a necessary and sufficient condition for being MF. We prove here that the same condition as Li and Shen found stays necessary and sufficient for arbitrary amalgamated free products.

Theorem (Th. 20) Let A,B,CA,B,C be separable C*-algebras and ΞΈA:Cβ†’A\theta_{A}:C\to A, ΞΈB:Cβ†’B\theta_{B}:C\to B be inclusions. Then Aβˆ—CBA\ast_{C}B is MF if and only if there exist embeddings Ο•A:Aβ†’βˆMn/βŠ•Mn\phi_{A}:A\to\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{n} and Ο•B:Bβ†’βˆMn/βŠ•Mn\phi_{B}:B\to\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{n} such that Ο•A∘θA=Ο•B∘θB\phi_{A}\circ\theta_{A}=\phi_{B}\circ\theta_{B}.

We use the theorem above to find a new class of groups that have MF full group C*-algebras.

Theorem (Th. 23) If G1G_{1} and G2G_{2} are amenable groups and HH is their common subgroup, then Cβˆ—β€‹(G1βˆ—HG2)C^{*}(G_{1}\ast_{H}G_{2}) is MF.

In [22] Rainone and Schafhauser proved that if GG is amenable, then for any action of 𝔽n\mathbb{F}_{n} on GG, Crβˆ—β€‹(Gβ‹Šπ”½n)C^{*}_{r}(G\rtimes\mathbb{F}_{n}) is MF. Here we use our results on amalgamated free products to obtain a similar result for full group C*-algebras.

Theorem (Cor. 35) For any semidirect product Gβ‹Šπ”½nG\rtimes\mathbb{F}_{n} of an amenable group GG by a free group 𝔽n\mathbb{F}_{n}, Cβˆ—β€‹(Gβ‹Šπ”½n)C^{*}(G\rtimes\mathbb{F}_{n}) is MF.

We also prove that Cβˆ—β€‹(β„€2β‹ŠS​L2​(β„€))C^{*}(\mathbb{Z}^{2}\rtimes SL_{2}(\mathbb{Z})) is MF (Cor. 34).

The same technique that we used for amalgamated free products applies to prove that the class of MF C*-algebras is closed under maximal tensor products with Cβˆ—β€‹(𝔽n)C^{*}(\mathbb{F}_{n}) (Th. 28) and under central HNN-extensions (Th. 29).

Approximation properties, such as hyperlinearity, quasidiagonality and the MF property, are of central importance in the C*-theory. Similar approximation properties for traces were introduced in [5], and turned out to play an important role in classification of nuclear simple C*-algebras ([30], [24]). It is an open problem whether all hyperlinear traces are MF.

Examples of C*-algebras with all hyperlinear traces being MF include all nuclear simple C*-algebras satisfying UCT ([30]), many crossed product C*-algebras ([22]) and all cone C*-algebras ([26]). Here we find more examples:

Theorem (Cor. 15) Let AA be a separable C*-algebra and let CC be any C*-subalgebra of AA. If AA is Hilbert-Schmidt stable, then every hyperlinear trace on Aβˆ—CAA\ast_{C}A is MF.

As an easy consequence of the theorem above we obtain that all hyperlinear traces on Cβˆ—β€‹(𝔽2×𝔽2)C^{*}(\mathbb{F}_{2}\times\mathbb{F}_{2}) are MF.

The main tool used for proving the above results is the lifting characterization of the MF property found by the author in [27].

Acknowledgments. The author is grateful to Don Hadwin for a useful discussion. The author is partially supported by a grant from the Swedish Research Council.

2 Preliminaries

2.1 Amalgamated free products

Definition 1.

Let A,B,CA,B,C be (unital) C*-algebras with (unital) embeddings ΞΈA:Cβ†’A\theta_{A}:C\to A and ΞΈB:Cβ†’B\theta_{B}:C\to B. The (unital) amalgamated free product of AA and BB over CC is the C*-algebra DD, equipped with (unital) embeddings iA:Aβ†’Di_{A}:A\to D and iB:Bβ†’Di_{B}:B\to D satisfying iA∘θA=iB∘θBi_{A}\circ\theta_{A}=i_{B}\circ\theta_{B}, such that DD is generated by iA​(A)​⋃iB​(B)i_{A}(A)\bigcup i_{B}(B) and satisfies the following universal property:

whenever β„°\mathcal{E} is a (unital) C*-algebra and Ο€A:Aβ†’β„°\pi_{A}:A\to\mathcal{E} and Ο€B:Bβ†’β„°\pi_{B}:B\to\mathcal{E} are (unital) βˆ—\ast-homomorphisms satisfying Ο€A∘θA=Ο€B∘θB\pi_{A}\circ\theta_{A}=\pi_{B}\circ\theta_{B}, there is a (unital) βˆ—\ast-homomorphism Ο€:Dβ†’β„°\pi:D\to\mathcal{E} such that Ο€βˆ˜iA=Ο€A\pi\circ i_{A}=\pi_{A} and Ο€βˆ˜iB=Ο€B\pi\circ i_{B}=\pi_{B}.

Standardly the (unital) amalgamated free product CC is denoted by Aβˆ—CBA\ast_{C}B. Sometimes, when it is important to emphasize how CC is embedded into AA and BB respectively, we will write Aβˆ—ΞΈA,ΞΈBBA\ast_{\theta_{A},\theta_{B}}B rather than Aβˆ—CBA\ast_{C}B. When we write Aβˆ—CAA\ast_{C}A we always mean that CC is embedded into both copies of AA identically.

Amalgamated free product of more than two factors is defined analogously.

C*-algebraic definition of amalgamated free product agrees with the group-theoretical definition of amalgamated free product in the following sense:

Cβˆ—β€‹(G1βˆ—HG2)=Cβˆ—β€‹(G1)βˆ—Cβˆ—β€‹(H)Cβˆ—β€‹(G2).C^{*}(G_{1}\ast_{H}G_{2})=C^{*}(G_{1})\ast_{C^{*}(H)}C^{*}(G_{2}).

2.2 MF C*-algebras and groups

We use notation MnM_{n} for the C*-algebra of all nΓ—nn\times n matrices. Let

∏Mn={(Tn)nβˆˆβ„•|Tn∈Mn,supnβˆ₯Tnβˆ₯<∞},\prod M_{n}=\{(T_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\;|\;T_{n}\in M_{n},\;\sup_{n}\|T_{n}\|<\infty\},
⨁Mn={(Tn)nβˆˆβ„•|limnβ†’βˆžβ€–Tnβ€–=0}.\bigoplus M_{n}=\{(T_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\;|\;\lim_{n\to\infty}\|T_{n}\|=0\}.
Definition 2.

([4]) A C*-algebra is matricial field (MF) if it embeds into ∏Mn/βŠ•Mn\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{n}.

Equivalently, AA is MF if there exist maps Ο•n:Aβ†’Mkn\phi_{n}:A\to M_{k_{n}}, for some knβˆˆβ„•k_{n}\in\mathbb{N}, which are approximately multiplicative, approximately linear, approximately self-adjoint, and approximately injective. Reformulating it ”locally”, AA is MF if for any finite FβŠ‚AF\subset A and Ο΅>0\epsilon>0 there is kk and a map Ο•k:Aβ†’Mk\phi_{k}:A\to M_{k} such that

βˆ₯Ο•(a)βˆ₯>βˆ₯aβˆ₯βˆ’Ο΅,βˆ₯Ο•(ab)βˆ’Ο•(a)Ο•(b)βˆ₯≀ϡ,βˆ₯Ο•(a+b)βˆ’Ο•(a)βˆ’Ο•(b)βˆ₯≀ϡ,βˆ₯Ο•(aβˆ—)βˆ’Ο•(a)βˆ—βˆ₯≀ϡ,\|\phi_{(}a)\|>\|a\|-\epsilon,\;\|\phi(ab)-\phi(a)\phi(b)\|\leq\epsilon,\\ \|\phi(a+b)-\phi(a)-\phi(b)\|\leq\epsilon,\;\|\phi(a^{*})-\phi(a)^{*}\|\leq\epsilon,

for any a,b∈Fa,b\in F.

Definition 3.

([6]) A group is MF if it embeds into the unitary group 𝒰(∏Mn/βŠ•Mn)\mathcal{U}\left(\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{n}\right) of ∏Mn/βŠ•Mn\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{n}.11 1 A different, more strong, property of a group was also called MF in [23], see also [19].

A discrete group GG embeds into Cβˆ—β€‹(G)C^{*}(G) and Crβˆ—β€‹(G)C^{*}_{r}(G) and therefore, if either Cβˆ—β€‹(G)C^{*}(G) or Crβˆ—β€‹(G)C^{*}_{r}(G) is MF, so is GG.

2.3 Asymptotic homomorphisms

Definition ([7]). An asymptotic homomorphism from AA to BB is a family of maps (fΞ»)λ∈[0,∞):Aβ†’B(f_{\lambda})_{\lambda\in[0,\infty)}:A\to B satisfying the following properties:

(i) for any a∈Aa\in A, the mapping [0,∞)β†’B[0,\infty)\to B defined by the rule Ξ»β†’fλ​(a)\lambda\to f_{\lambda}(a) is continuous;

(ii) for any a,b∈Aa,b\in A and ΞΌ1,ΞΌ2βˆˆβ„‚\mu_{1},\mu_{2}\in\mathbb{C}, we have

  • β€’

    limΞ»β†’βˆžβ€–fλ​(aβˆ—)βˆ’fλ​(a)βˆ—β€–=0;\lim_{\lambda\to\infty}\|f_{\lambda}(a^{*})-f_{\lambda}(a)^{*}\|=0;

  • β€’

    limΞ»β†’βˆžβ€–fλ​(ΞΌ1​a+ΞΌ2​b)βˆ’ΞΌ1​fλ​(a)βˆ’ΞΌ2​fλ​(b)β€–=0;\lim_{\lambda\to\infty}\|f_{\lambda}(\mu_{1}a+\mu_{2}b)-\mu_{1}f_{\lambda}(a)-\mu_{2}f_{\lambda}(b)\|=0;

  • β€’

    limΞ»β†’βˆžβ€‹β€–fλ​(a​b)βˆ’fλ​(a)​fλ​(b)β€–=0.\lim{\lambda\to\infty}\|f_{\lambda}(ab)-f_{\lambda}(a)f_{\lambda}(b)\|=0.

We will call (fΞ»)Ξ»βˆˆΞ›:Aβ†’B(f_{\lambda})_{\lambda\in\Lambda}:A\to B, where Ξ›\Lambda is a directed set, a discrete asymptotic homomorphism if the condition (ii) above is satisfied and for each a∈Aa\in A one has supΞ»β€–fλ​(a)β€–<∞\sup_{\lambda}\|f_{\lambda}(a)\|<\infty. (For usual asymptotic homomorphisms the last condition holds automatically, see [7] or [8]). In this paper discrete asymptotic homomorphisms will be indexed by Ξ›=β„•\Lambda=\mathbb{N}.

Let q:Bβ†’B/Iq:B\to B/I be a quotient map and f:Aβ†’B/If:A\to B/I a βˆ—\ast-homomorphism. Following Manuilov and Thomsen ([21], [20]), we say that ff lifts to a discrete asymptotic homomorphism Ο•n\phi_{n}, nβˆˆβ„•n\in\mathbb{N}, if qβˆ˜Ο•n=fq\circ\phi_{n}=f, for each nβˆˆβ„•n\in\mathbb{N}.

3 Amalgamated free products Aβˆ—CAA\ast_{C}A

. Let HH be a Hilbert space and let PnP_{n}, nβˆˆβ„•n\in\mathbb{N}, be an increasing sequence of projections of dimension nn that βˆ—\ast-strongly converges to 1B⁑(H)1_{B(H)}. We will identify MnM_{n} with Pn​B​(H)​PnP_{n}B(H)P_{n}. Let π’ŸβŠ‚βˆnβˆˆβ„•Mn\mathcal{D}\subset\prod_{n\in\mathbb{N}}M_{n} be the C*-algebra of all βˆ—\ast-strongly convergent sequences of matrices. Let q:π’Ÿβ†’B⁑(H)q:\mathcal{D}\to B(H) be the surjection that sends each sequence to its βˆ—\ast-strong limit.

Our main tool for exploring the MF-property of amalgamated free products will be the following lifting characterization of the MF-property obtained in [27].

Theorem 4.

(Shulman [27, Th. 14]) Let AA be a separable C*-algebra. TFAE:

  • (i)

    AA is MF,

  • (ii)

    every βˆ—\ast-homomorphism from AA to B⁑(H)B(H) lifts to a discrete asymptotic homomorphism from AA to π’Ÿ\mathcal{D},

  • (iii)

    there exists an embedding of AA into B⁑(H)B(H) that lifts to a discrete asymptotic homomorphism from AA to π’Ÿ\mathcal{D}.

Remark 5.

In the above characterization of the MF property π’Ÿ\mathcal{D} and B⁑(H)B(H) can be replaced by MN​(π’Ÿ)M_{N}(\mathcal{D}) and B⁑(HβŠ•N)B(H^{\oplus N}) respectively, for any Nβˆˆβ„•N\in\mathbb{N}.

Remark 6.

In Theorem 4 one can replace liftability to a discrete asymptotic homomorphism by liftability to a contractive discrete asymptotic homomorphism. To arrange this, in the proof of Theorem 4 one uses the existence of a contractive continuous section proved in [26].

Lemma 7.

Let A,BA,B and DD be C*-algebras and let CC be a common C*-subalgebra of AA and BB. Let ϕλA:Aβ†’D\phi_{\lambda}^{A}:A\to D and ϕλB:Bβ†’D\phi_{\lambda}^{B}:B\to D, Ξ»βˆˆΞ›\lambda\in\Lambda, be contractive (discrete) asymptotic homomorphisms such that

limΞ»β†’βˆžβ€–Ο•Ξ»A​(c)βˆ’Ο•Ξ»B​(c)β€–=0,\lim_{{\lambda}\to\infty}\|\phi_{\lambda}^{A}(c)-\phi_{\lambda}^{B}(c)\|=0,

for each c∈Cc\in C. Then there exists a contractive (discrete) asymptotic homomorphism Φλ:Aβˆ—CBβ†’D\Phi_{\lambda}:A\ast_{C}B\to D, Ξ»βˆˆΞ›{\lambda}\in\Lambda, such that

limΞ»β†’βˆžβ€–Ξ¦Ξ»A​(a)βˆ’Ο•Ξ»A​(a)β€–=0,\lim_{{\lambda}\to\infty}\|\Phi_{\lambda}^{A}(a)-\phi_{\lambda}^{A}(a)\|=0,
limΞ»β†’βˆžβ€–Ξ¦Ξ»B​(b)βˆ’Ο•Ξ»B​(b)β€–=0,\lim_{{\lambda}\to\infty}\|\Phi_{\lambda}^{B}(b)-\phi_{\lambda}^{B}(b)\|=0,

for each a∈A,b∈Ba\in A,b\in B.

Proof.

The asymptotic homomorphisms ϕλA:Aβ†’D\phi_{\lambda}^{A}:A\to D and ϕλB:Bβ†’D\phi_{\lambda}^{B}:B\to D, Ξ»βˆˆΞ›\lambda\in\Lambda, induce βˆ—\ast-homomorphisms Ο•A:Aβ†’Cb​(Ξ›,D)/C0​(Ξ›,D)\phi^{A}:A\to C_{b}(\Lambda,D)/C_{0}(\Lambda,D) and Ο•B:Bβ†’Cb​(Ξ›,D)/C0​(Ξ›,D)\phi^{B}:B\to C_{b}(\Lambda,D)/C_{0}(\Lambda,D) by formula

Ο•A​(a)=(ϕλA​(a))Ξ»βˆˆΞ›+C0​(Ξ›,D),\phi_{A}(a)=\left(\phi_{\lambda}^{A}(a)\right)_{\lambda\in\Lambda}+C_{0}(\Lambda,D),
Ο•B​(b)=(ϕλB​(b))Ξ»βˆˆΞ›+C0​(Ξ›,D).\phi_{B}(b)=\left(\phi_{\lambda}^{B}(b)\right)_{\lambda\in\Lambda}+C_{0}(\Lambda,D).

Since for each c∈Cc\in C, limΞ»β†’βˆžβ€–Ο•Ξ»A​(c)βˆ’Ο•Ξ»B​(c)β€–=0,\lim_{{\lambda}\to\infty}\|\phi_{\lambda}^{A}(c)-\phi_{\lambda}^{B}(c)\|=0, we have

Ο•A​(c)=Ο•B​(c),\phi^{A}(c)=\phi^{B}(c),

c∈Cc\in C. Therefore Ο•A\phi^{A} and Ο•B\phi^{B} induce a βˆ—\ast-homomorphism

Ξ¦=Ο•Aβˆ—Ο•B:Aβˆ—CBβ†’Cb​(Ξ›,D)/C0​(Ξ›,D).\Phi=\phi^{A}\ast\phi^{B}:A\ast_{C}B\to C_{b}(\Lambda,D)/C_{0}(\Lambda,D).

By [26, Th. 3] there is a contractive continuous section s:Cb​(Ξ›,D)/C0​(Ξ›,D)β†’Cb​(Ξ›,D)s:C_{b}(\Lambda,D)/C_{0}(\Lambda,D)\to C_{b}(\Lambda,D). Then

Φλ=e​vλ∘s∘Φ:Aβˆ—CBβ†’D\Phi_{\lambda}=ev_{\lambda}\circ s\circ\Phi:A\ast_{C}B\to D

is a contractive (discrete) asymptotic homomorphism. Since (Φλ​(a))Ξ»βˆˆΞ›\left(\Phi_{\lambda}(a)\right)_{\lambda\in\Lambda} and (ϕλA​(a))Ξ»βˆˆΞ›\left(\phi_{\lambda}^{A}(a)\right)_{\lambda\in\Lambda} are both representatives of Ο•A​(a)\phi^{A}(a), we conclude that

limΞ»β†’βˆžβ€–Ξ¦Ξ»A​(a)βˆ’Ο•Ξ»A​(a)β€–=0,\lim_{{\lambda}\to\infty}\|\Phi_{\lambda}^{A}(a)-\phi_{\lambda}^{A}(a)\|=0,

for each a∈Aa\in A. Similarly for BB. ∎

Lemma 8.

Let q:Bβ†’B/Iq:B\to B/I be a quotient map and let {iΞ»}Ξ»βˆˆΞ›\{i_{\lambda}\}_{\lambda\in\Lambda} be a quasicentral approximate unit for I⊲BI\lhd B. Then for any x,y∈Bx,y\in B and Nβˆˆβ„•N\in\mathbb{N}

lim supΞ»|[(x⁑(1βˆ’iΞ»))N,y]|=β€–[q​(x)N,q⁑(y)]β€–.\limsup_{\lambda}\|[(x(1-i_{\lambda}))^{N},y]\|=\|[q(x)^{N},q(y)]\|.
Proof.

Since {iΞ»}Ξ»βˆˆΞ›\{i_{\lambda}\}_{\lambda\in\Lambda} is quasicentral,

lim supΞ»β€–[(x⁑(1βˆ’iΞ»))N,y]β€–=lim supΞ»β€–(1βˆ’iΞ»)N​[xN,y]β€–.\limsup_{\lambda}\|[(x(1-i_{\lambda}))^{N},y]\|=\limsup_{\lambda}\|(1-i_{\lambda})^{N}[x^{N},y]\|. (1)

Let uΞ»=1βˆ’(1βˆ’iΞ»)N.u_{\lambda}=1-(1-i_{\lambda})^{N}. Then {uΞ»}Ξ»βˆˆΞ›\{u_{\lambda}\}_{\lambda\in\Lambda} is itself a (quasicentral) approximate unit. It is well-known that for any approximate unit, hence for {uΞ»}Ξ»βˆˆΞ›\{u_{\lambda}\}_{\lambda\in\Lambda}, and any z∈Bz\in B

lim supΞ»β€–(1βˆ’uΞ»)​zβ€–=β€–q⁑(z)β€–\limsup_{\lambda}\|(1-u_{\lambda})z\|=\|q(z)\|

(see e.g. [17]). This and (1) imply the statement. ∎

Lemma 9.

Let u,a1,…,aN∈B/I,u,a_{1},\ldots,a_{N}\in B/I, where uu is a unitary and [ai,u]=0,[a_{i},u]=0, i=1,…,Ni=1,\ldots,N. Let A1,…,AN∈BA_{1},\ldots,A_{N}\in B be lifts of a1,…,aNa_{1},\ldots,a_{N}, i=1,…,Ni=1,\ldots,N, and let Ο΅>0\epsilon>0. Then (uβˆ’uβˆ—)\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}u&\\ &-u^{*}\end{array}\right) lifts to a unitary V∈M2​(B)V\in M_{2}(B) such that

β€–[(AiAi),V]‖≀ϡ,\left\|\left[\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}A_{i}&\\ &A_{i}\end{array}\right),V\right]\right\|\leq\epsilon,

i=1,…,Ni=1,\ldots,N.

Proof.

First we lift uu to a contraction X∈BX\in B. Let {iΞ»},Ξ»βˆˆΞ›,\{i_{\lambda}\},\lambda\in\Lambda, be a quasicentral approximate unit for I⊲BI\lhd B. By Lemma 8 there exists Ξ»\lambda such that for X~=X⁑(1βˆ’iΞ»)\tilde{X}=X(1-i_{\lambda}) we have

β€–[X~,Ai]‖≀ϡ2,\|[\tilde{X},A_{i}]\|\leq\frac{\epsilon}{2},
β€–[X~βˆ—,Ai]‖≀ϡ2,\|[\tilde{X}^{*},A_{i}]\|\leq\frac{\epsilon}{2},
β€–[X~​X~βˆ—,Ai]‖≀ϡ24,\|[\tilde{X}\tilde{X}^{*},A_{i}]\|\leq\frac{\epsilon^{2}}{4},
β€–[X~βˆ—β€‹X~,Ai]‖≀ϡ24,\|[\tilde{X}^{*}\tilde{X},A_{i}]\|\leq\frac{\epsilon^{2}}{4},

i=1,…,Ni=1,\ldots,N. We define a unitary V∈M2​(B)V\in M_{2}(B) by

V=(X~1βˆ’X~​X~βˆ—1βˆ’X~βˆ—β€‹X~βˆ’X~βˆ—).V=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}\tilde{X}&\sqrt{1-\tilde{X}\tilde{X}^{*}}\\ \sqrt{1-\tilde{X}^{*}\tilde{X}}&-\tilde{X}^{*}\end{array}\right).

Then

[V,(Ai00Ai)]=([X~,Ai][(1βˆ’X~​X~βˆ—)1/2,Ai][(1βˆ’X~βˆ—β€‹X~)1/2,Ai][βˆ’X~βˆ—,Ai]),\left[V,\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}A_{i}&0\\ 0&A_{i}\end{array}\right)\right]=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}[\tilde{X},A_{i}]&[(1-\tilde{X}{\tilde{X}}^{*})^{1/2},A_{i}]\\ [(1-\tilde{X}^{*}\tilde{X})^{1/2},A_{i}]&[-\tilde{X}^{*},A_{i}]\end{array}\right),

i=1,…,Ni=1,\ldots,N.

By Pedersen’s inequality (which says that β€–[A1/2,B]‖≀54​‖[A,B]β€–1/2\|[A^{1/2},B]\|\leq\frac{5}{4}\|[A,B]\|^{1/2} when 0≀A≀10\leq A\leq 1) we have

β€–[(1βˆ’X~​X~βˆ—)1/2,Ai]‖≀54​‖[1βˆ’X~​X~βˆ—,Ai]β€–1/2=54​‖[X~​X~βˆ—,Ai]β€–1/2<Ο΅/2,\|[(1-\tilde{X}{\tilde{X}}^{*})^{1/2},A_{i}]\|\leq\frac{5}{4}\|[1-\tilde{X}\tilde{X}^{*},A_{i}]\|^{1/2}=\frac{5}{4}\|[\tilde{X}\tilde{X}^{*},A_{i}]\|^{1/2}<\epsilon/2,

i=1,…,Ni=1,\ldots,N, and the same for [(1βˆ’X~X~βˆ—)1/2,Ai]βˆ₯[(1-\tilde{X}{\tilde{X}}^{*})^{1/2},A_{i}]\|. Therefore

β€–[V,(Ai00Ai)]‖≀‖([X~,Ai]00[βˆ’X~βˆ—,Ai])β€–+β€–(0[(1βˆ’X~​X~βˆ—)1/2,Ai][(1βˆ’X~βˆ—β€‹X~)1/2,Ai]0)β€–<Ο΅/2+Ο΅/2=Ο΅,\left\|\left[V,\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}A_{i}&0\\ 0&A_{i}\end{array}\right)\right]\right\|\leq\\ \left\|\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}[\tilde{X},A_{i}]&0\\ 0&[-\tilde{X}^{*},A_{i}]\end{array}\right)\right\|+\\ \left\|\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&[(1-\tilde{X}{\tilde{X}}^{*})^{1/2},A_{i}]\\ [(1-\tilde{X}^{*}\tilde{X})^{1/2},A_{i}]&0\end{array}\right)\right\|<\epsilon/2+\epsilon/2=\epsilon, (2)

i=1,…,Ni=1,\ldots,N.

∎

Theorem 10.

Let AA be a separable MF C*-algebra and let CC be any C*-subalgebra of AA. Then Aβˆ—CAA\ast_{C}A is MF.

Proof.

Let Ο€=Ο€1βˆ—Ο€2:Aβˆ—CAβ†’B⁑(H)\pi=\pi_{1}\ast\pi_{2}:A\ast_{C}A\to B(H) be an embedding. Let

ρ1=Ο€1βŠ•Ο€2,ρ2=Ο€2βŠ•Ο€1.\rho_{1}=\pi_{1}\oplus\pi_{2},\;\rho_{2}=\pi_{2}\oplus\pi_{1}.

Then (ρ1βŠ•Ο1)βˆ—(ρ2βŠ•Ο2):Aβˆ—CAβ†’B⁑(HβŠ•4)(\rho_{1}\oplus\rho_{1})\ast(\rho_{2}\oplus\rho_{2}):A\ast_{C}A\to B\left(H^{\oplus 4}\right) is also an embedding. We will show that it asymptotically lifts to a discrete asymptotic homomorphism from Aβˆ—CAA\ast_{C}A to M4​(π’Ÿ)M_{4}(\mathcal{D}). Then Theorem 4 would finish the proof.

Since ρ1=uβˆ—β€‹Ο2​u\rho_{1}=u^{*}\rho_{2}u, where u=(0110)u=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&1\\ 1&0\end{array}\right), and since ρ1|C=ρ2|C\rho_{1}|_{C}=\rho_{2}|_{C}, we have

ρ2​(c)=uβˆ—β€‹Ο2​(c)​u,\rho_{2}(c)=u^{*}\rho_{2}(c)u,

c∈Cc\in C, or, equivalently,

[ρ2​(c),u]=0,[\rho_{2}(c),u]=0,

c∈Cc\in C. Since AA is MF, by Theorem 4 and Remark 6 the representation ρ2\rho_{2} lifts to a contractive discrete asymptotic homomorphism Ο•n:Aβ†’M2​(π’Ÿ)\phi_{n}:A\to M_{2}(\mathcal{D}), nβˆˆβ„•n\in\mathbb{N}. Let {c1,c2,…}\{c_{1},c_{2},\ldots\} be a dense subset of CC and let Fk={c1,…,ck}F_{k}=\{c_{1},\ldots,c_{k}\}. By Lemma 9 there exists a lift Vk∈M4​(π’Ÿ)V_{k}\in M_{4}(\mathcal{D}) of (uβˆ’uβˆ—)\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}u&\\ &-u^{*}\end{array}\right) such that

β€–[Vk,(Ο•k​(c)00Ο•k​(c))]‖≀1k,\|\left[V_{k},\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}\phi_{k}(c)&0\\ 0&\phi_{k}(c)\end{array}\right)\right]\|\leq\frac{1}{k}, (3)

c∈Fkc\in F_{k}.

Define asymptotic homomorphisms Ο•k(1),Ο•k(2):Aβ†’M4​(π’Ÿ)\phi_{k}^{(1)},\phi_{k}^{(2)}:A\to M_{4}(\mathcal{D}), kβˆˆβ„•k\in\mathbb{N}, by

Ο•k(2)=Ο•kβŠ•Ο•k,Ο•k(1)=Vkβˆ—β€‹Ο•k(2)​Vk.\phi_{k}^{(2)}=\phi_{k}\oplus\phi_{k},\;\phi_{k}^{(1)}=V_{k}^{*}\phi_{k}^{(2)}V_{k}.

Then

qβˆ˜Ο•k(2)=ρ2βŠ•Ο2,q\circ\phi_{k}^{(2)}=\rho_{2}\oplus\rho_{2},
qβˆ˜Ο•k(1)=(uβŠ•(βˆ’uβˆ—))βˆ—β€‹(ρ2βŠ•Ο2)​(uβŠ•(βˆ’uβˆ—)=(uβŠ•u)βˆ—β€‹(ρ2βŠ•Ο2)​(uβŠ•u)=ρ1βŠ•Ο1CLOSEq\circ\phi_{k}^{(1)}=(u\oplus(-u^{*}))^{*}(\rho_{2}\oplus\rho_{2})(u\oplus(-u^{*})=(u\oplus u)^{*}(\rho_{2}\oplus\rho_{2})(u\oplus u)=\rho_{1}\oplus\rho_{1}

(we used here that uβˆ—=uu^{*}=u).

Now we will show that the asymptotic homomorphisms Ο•k(1),Ο•k(2)\phi_{k}^{(1)},\phi_{k}^{(2)} asymptotically agree on CC. Let c∈C,Ο΅>0c\in C,\epsilon>0. There exists k0βˆˆβ„•k_{0}\in\mathbb{N} and c0∈Fk0c_{0}\in F_{k_{0}} such that 1k0<Ο΅\frac{1}{k_{0}}<\epsilon and β€–cβˆ’c0β€–<Ο΅.\|c-c_{0}\|<\epsilon. Since Ο•k(1),Ο•k(2)\phi_{k}^{(1)},\phi_{k}^{(2)} are contractive asymptotic homomorphisms, there exists k1>k0k_{1}>k_{0} such that for any k>k1k>k_{1}

β€–Ο•k(i)​(c)βˆ’Ο•k(i)​(c0)‖≀‖ϕk(i)​(cβˆ’c0)β€–+ϡ≀‖cβˆ’c0β€–+Ο΅<2​ϡ,\|\phi_{k}^{(i)}(c)-\phi_{k}^{(i)}(c_{0})\|\leq\|\phi_{k}^{(i)}(c-c_{0})\|+\epsilon\leq\|c-c_{0}\|+\epsilon<2\epsilon,

i=1,2i=1,2. Then, using (3), for any k>k1k>k_{1} we obtain

β€–Ο•k(1)​(c)βˆ’Ο•k(2)​(c)β€–<4​ϡ+β€–Ο•k(1)​(c0)βˆ’Ο•k(2)​(c0)β€–=4Ο΅+βˆ₯Vkβˆ—Ο•k(2)(c0)Vkβˆ’Ο•k(2)(c0))βˆ₯=4Ο΅+βˆ₯[Vk,Ο•k(2)(c0)]βˆ₯≀4Ο΅+1k0<5Ο΅.\|\phi_{k}^{(1)}(c)-\phi_{k}^{(2)}(c)\|<4\epsilon+\|\phi_{k}^{(1)}(c_{0})-\phi_{k}^{(2)}(c_{0})\|\\ =4\epsilon+\|V_{k}^{*}\phi_{k}^{(2)}(c_{0})V_{k}-\phi_{k}^{(2)}(c_{0}))\|=4\epsilon+\|[V_{k},\phi_{k}^{(2)}(c_{0})]\|\leq 4\epsilon+\frac{1}{k_{0}}<5\epsilon.

Thus, for each c∈Cc\in C,

limkβ†’βˆžβ€–Ο•k(1)​(c)βˆ’Ο•k(2)​(c)β€–=0.\lim_{k\to\infty}\|\phi_{k}^{(1)}(c)-\phi_{k}^{(2)}(c)\|=0.

By Lemma 7 there exists an asymptotic homomorphism Ξ¦k:Aβˆ—CAβ†’M4​(π’Ÿ)\Phi_{k}:A\ast_{C}A\to M_{4}(\mathcal{D}), kβˆˆβ„•k\in\mathbb{N}, such that

limkβ†’βˆžβ€–Ξ¦k​(i1​(a))βˆ’Ο•k(1)​(a)β€–=0,\lim_{k\to\infty}\|\Phi_{k}(i_{1}(a))-\phi_{k}^{(1)}(a)\|=0,
limkβ†’βˆžβ€–Ξ¦k​(i2​(a))βˆ’Ο•k(2)​(a)β€–=0,\lim_{k\to\infty}\|\Phi_{k}(i_{2}(a))-\phi_{k}^{(2)}(a)\|=0,

a∈Aa\in A. Applying the quotient map qq to these equalities we obtain that Ξ¦k|i1​(A)\Phi_{k}|_{i_{1}(A)}, kβˆˆβ„•k\in\mathbb{N}, is an asymptotic lift of ρ1βŠ•Ο1\rho_{1}\oplus\rho_{1} and Ξ¦k|i2​(A)\Phi_{k}|_{i_{2}(A)}, kβˆˆβ„•k\in\mathbb{N}, is an asymptotic lift of ρ2βŠ•Ο2\rho_{2}\oplus\rho_{2}. Then for xx in the dense subset

E=span{i1(a1)i2(a2)…i1(an)i2(an+1)|nβˆˆβ„•,ai∈A}E=span\{i_{1}(a_{1})i_{2}(a_{2})\ldots i_{1}(a_{n})i_{2}(a_{n+1})\;|\;n\in\mathbb{N},a_{i}\in A\}

of Aβˆ—CAA\ast_{C}A, β€–q∘Φk​(x)βˆ’(ρ1βŠ•Ο1)βˆ—(ρ2βŠ•Ο2)​(x)β€–β†’0\|q\circ\Phi_{k}(x)-(\rho_{1}\oplus\rho_{1})\ast(\rho_{2}\oplus\rho_{2})(x)\|\to 0 as kβ†’βˆžk\to\infty. It implies that Ξ¦k\Phi_{k}, kβˆˆβ„•k\in\mathbb{N}, is an asymptotic lift of (ρ1βŠ•Ο1)βˆ—(ρ2βŠ•Ο2)(\rho_{1}\oplus\rho_{1})\ast(\rho_{2}\oplus\rho_{2}). By Theorem 4, Aβˆ—CAA\ast_{C}A is MF. ∎

Example 11.

In [14] Higman proved that the group

G=⟨a,b,c|aβˆ’1ca=c2=bβˆ’1cb⟩G=\left<a,b,c\;|\;a^{-1}ca=c^{2}=b^{-1}cb\right>

is not residually finite. Since it is finitely generated, it is also non-MAP by Maltsev’s Theorem. This group can be written as the group double

G=B​S​(1,2)βˆ—β„€B​S​(1,2),G=BS(1,2)\ast_{\mathbb{Z}}BS(1,2),

where BS(1,2)=⟨a,c|aβˆ’1ca=c2⟩BS(1,2)=\left<a,c\;|\;a^{-1}ca=c^{2}\right> is the Baumslag-Solitar group and β„€=⟨c⟩\mathbb{Z}=\left<c\right>. Then Cβˆ—β€‹(G)=Cβˆ—β€‹(B​S​(1,2))βˆ—C⁑(𝕋)Cβˆ—β€‹(B​S​(1,2)).C^{*}(G)=C^{*}(BS(1,2))\ast_{C(\mathbb{T})}C^{*}(BS(1,2)). Since B​S​(1,2)BS(1,2) is amenable and therefore has MF full group C*-algebra ([30]), by Theorem 10 Cβˆ—β€‹(G)C^{*}(G) is MF.

Example 12.

A group double of a residually finite (RF) group need not be RF even when amalgamation is done over a central subgroup ([28]). Namely for the Abels group

Ξ“={(1x12x13x140pkx23x2400pnx340001):xi​jβˆˆβ„€[1p],k,nβˆˆβ„€}\Gamma=\left\{\left(\begin{array}[]{cccc}1&x_{12}&x_{13}&x_{14}\\ 0&p^{k}&x_{23}&x_{24}\\ 0&0&p^{n}&x_{34}\\ 0&0&0&1\end{array}\right):x_{ij}\in\mathbb{Z}\left[\frac{1}{p}\right],k,n\in\mathbb{Z}\right\}

and its central subgroup

N={(100x010000100001):xβˆˆβ„€}β‰…β„€,N=\left\{\left(\begin{array}[]{cccc}1&0&0&x\\ 0&1&0&0\\ 0&0&1&0\\ 0&0&0&1\end{array}\right):x\in\mathbb{Z}\right\}\cong\mathbb{Z},

the amalgamated free product Ξ“βˆ—NΞ“\Gamma\ast_{N}\Gamma is not maximally almost periodic, hence is not RF ([28, Prop.8.]). Again, by Theorem 10 we see that Cβˆ—β€‹(Ξ“βˆ—NΞ“)C^{*}(\Gamma\ast_{N}\Gamma) is MF.

3.1 MF traces

A trace Ο„\tau on a C*-algebra AA is hyperlinear if for any Ο΅>0\epsilon>0 and a finite GβŠ‚AG\subset A there is nβˆˆβ„•n\in\mathbb{N} and a map Ο•:Aβ†’Mn\phi:A\to M_{n} such that

‖ϕ⁑(a​b)βˆ’Ο•β‘(a)​ϕ​(b)β€–2<ϡ​and​|τ⁑(a)βˆ’t​r​ϕ​(a)|<Ο΅,\|\phi(ab)-\phi(a)\phi(b)\|_{2}<\epsilon\;\;\text{and}\;\;|\tau(a)-tr\phi(a)|<\epsilon,

for any a∈Ga\in G.

(Equivalently, one can say that Ο„\tau is hyperlinear if Ο„=t​r∘f\tau=tr\circ f, for some βˆ—\ast-homomorphism f:Aβ†’βˆMn/βŠ•2Mnf:A\to\prod M_{n}/\oplus_{2}M_{n}, where βŠ•2Mkn\oplus_{2}M_{k_{n}} is the ideal of all sequences that converge to zero in the 2-norm.)

A trace Ο„\tau is MF if for any Ο΅>0\epsilon>0 and a finite GβŠ‚AG\subset A there is nβˆˆβ„•n\in\mathbb{N} and a map Ο•:Aβ†’Mn\phi:A\to M_{n} such that

‖ϕ⁑(a​b)βˆ’Ο•β‘(a)​ϕ​(b)β€–<ϡ​and​|τ⁑(a)βˆ’t​r​ϕ​(a)|<Ο΅,\|\phi(ab)-\phi(a)\phi(b)\|<\epsilon\;\;\text{and}\;\;|\tau(a)-tr\phi(a)|<\epsilon,

for any a∈Ga\in G.

The property of a trace to be MF is another property that can be formulated in terms of asymptotic lifting [27].

Proposition 13.

([27, Prop. 22]) Let Ο„\tau be a trace on a C*-algebra AA. TFAE:

  • (i)

    Ο„\tau is an MF trace,

  • (ii)

    there exists a βˆ—\ast-homomorphism f:Aβ†’βˆMmn/βŠ•2,Ο‰Mmnf:A\to\prod M_{m_{n}}/\oplus_{2,\omega}M_{m_{n}} such that Ο„=t​r​f\tau=trf and ff lifts to a discrete asymptotic homomorphism from AA to ∏Mn\prod M_{n},

In particular Proposition 13 implies that if all βˆ—\ast-homomorphisms from AA to ∏Mmn/βŠ•2,Ο‰Mmn\prod M_{m_{n}}/\oplus_{2,\omega}M_{m_{n}} lift to discrete asymptotic homomorphisms to ∏Mn\prod M_{n}, then all hyperlinear traces on AA are MF.

The same arguments as in the proof of Theorem 10 apply to obtain the following result.

Theorem 14.

Let AA be a separable C*-algebra and let CC be any C*-subalgebra of AA. If every βˆ—\ast-homomorphism from AA to ∏Mmn/βŠ•2,Ο‰Mmn\prod M_{m_{n}}/\oplus_{2,\omega}M_{m_{n}} lifts to a discrete asymptotic homomorphism to ∏Mn\prod M_{n}, then the same holds for Aβˆ—CAA\ast_{C}A. In particular, every hyperlinear trace on Aβˆ—CAA\ast_{C}A is MF.

A C*-algebra is called Hilbert-Schmidt stable (HS-stable) if every βˆ—\ast-homomorphism from AA to ∏Mmn/βŠ•2,Ο‰Mmn\prod M_{m_{n}}/\oplus_{2,\omega}M_{m_{n}} lifts to a βˆ—\ast-homomorphism to ∏Mn\prod M_{n}.

Corollary 15.

Let AA be a separable C*-algebra and let CC be any C*-subalgebra of AA. If AA is Hilbert-Schmidt stable, then every hyperlinear trace on Aβˆ—CAA\ast_{C}A is MF.

Example 16.

𝔽2×𝔽2\mathbb{F}_{2}\times\mathbb{F}_{2} can be written as amalgamated free product

𝔽2×𝔽2β‰…(𝔽2Γ—β„€)βˆ—π”½2(𝔽2Γ—Z).\mathbb{F}_{2}\times\mathbb{F}_{2}\cong(\mathbb{F}_{2}\times\mathbb{Z})\ast_{\mathbb{F}_{2}}(\mathbb{F}_{2}\times Z).

By [12, Th. 2.7] (also [15]) Cβˆ—β€‹(𝔽2Γ—β„€)C^{*}(\mathbb{F}_{2}\times\mathbb{Z}) is Hilbert-Schmidt stable. Therefore every hyperlinear trace on Cβˆ—β€‹(𝔽2×𝔽2)C^{*}(\mathbb{F}_{2}\times\mathbb{F}_{2}) is MF.

3.2 General amalgamated free products

Here we find necessary and sufficient conditions for general amalgamated free products to be MF.

Theorem 17.

([9, Th. 4.11]) Let A,B,DA,B,D be unital C*-algebras and CC be a separable unital C*-algebra. Let ΞΈA:Cβ†’A{\theta}_{A}:C\to A, ΞΈB:Cβ†’B{\theta}_{B}:C\to B, and Ο•A:Aβ†’D\phi_{A}:A\to D, Ο•B:Bβ†’D\phi_{B}:B\to D be unital inclusions such that Ο•A∘θA=Ο•B∘θB\phi_{A}\circ{\theta}_{A}=\phi_{B}\circ{\theta}_{B}. Then Aβˆ—CBA\ast_{C}B embeds into Dβˆ—CDD\ast_{C}D.

Remark 18.

In fact the embedding in the theorem above is given by the βˆ—\ast-homomorphism Ο•Aβˆ—Ο•B\phi_{A}\ast\phi_{B} that sends AA to the first copy of DD via Ο•A\phi_{A} and BB to the second copy of DD via Ο•B\phi_{B}. This βˆ—\ast-homomorphism is well-defined since Ο•A∘θA=Ο•B∘θB\phi_{A}\circ\theta_{A}=\phi_{B}\circ\theta_{B}.

Lemma 19.

([9, Lemma. 4.4]) Let A+A^{+} denote the forced unitization of AA. Then for any A,B,CA,B,C

A+βˆ—C+B+=(Aβˆ—CB)+.A^{+}\ast_{C^{+}}B^{+}=(A\ast_{C}B)^{+}.
Theorem 20.

Let A,B,CA,B,C be separable C*-algebras and ΞΈA:Cβ†’A\theta_{A}:C\to A, ΞΈB:Cβ†’B\theta_{B}:C\to B be inclusions. Then Aβˆ—CBA\ast_{C}B is MF if and only if there exist embeddings Ο•A:Aβ†’βˆMn/βŠ•Mn\phi_{A}:A\to\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{n} and Ο•B:Bβ†’βˆMn/βŠ•Mn\phi_{B}:B\to\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{n} such that Ο•A∘θA=Ο•B∘θB\phi_{A}\circ\theta_{A}=\phi_{B}\circ\theta_{B}.

Proof.

”Only if” is clear. We prove the ”if” part. At first we consider the unital case. Let

D=Cβˆ—(Ο•A(A),Ο•B(B))βŠ‚βˆMn/βŠ•Mn.D=C^{*}(\phi_{A}(A),\phi_{B}(B))\subset\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{n}.

By Theorem 17 Aβˆ—CBβŠ‚Dβˆ—CDA\ast_{C}B\subset D\ast_{C}D. Since DD is MF, by Theorem 10 Dβˆ—CDD\ast_{C}D is MF. Therefore Aβˆ—CBA\ast_{C}B is MF.

In the non-unital case (that is, when any of the C*-algebras or the inclusions is non-unital) we consider the forced unitizations of A,B,CA,B,C and the corresponding maps. By what is proved above, A+βˆ—C+B+A^{+}\ast_{C^{+}}B^{+} is MF. Lemma 19 finishes the proof. ∎

Now we consider amalgamated free products of more than two factors. If ΞΈj:Cβ†’Aj\theta_{j}:C\to A_{j}, j=1,…,Nj=1,\ldots,N, are inclusions, then the corresponding amalgamated free product will be denoted by βˆ—j=1N(Aj,ΞΈj)\ast_{j=1}^{N}(A_{j},\theta_{j}). Let ij:Ajβ†’βˆ—j=1k(Aj,ΞΈj)i_{j}:A_{j}\to\ast_{j=1}^{k}(A_{j},\theta_{j}) denote the canonical inclusion. Using the universal property of amalgamated free products, it is straightforward to check that

βˆ—j=1N(Aj,ΞΈj)=(βˆ—j=1Nβˆ’1(Aj,ΞΈj))βˆ—ii∘θ1,ΞΈNAN.\ast_{j=1}^{N}(A_{j},\theta_{j})=\left(\ast_{j=1}^{N-1}(A_{j},\theta_{j})\right)\ast_{i_{i}\circ\theta_{1},\theta_{N}}A_{N}.
Lemma 21.

If AA is a separable MF C*-algebra and ΞΈ:Cβ†’A\theta:C\to A is an inclusion, then βˆ—j=1N(A,ΞΈ)\ast_{j=1}^{N}(A,\theta) is MF.

Proof.

By induction. Suppose the statement is proved for k<Nk<N. We write

βˆ—j=1N(A,ΞΈ)=(βˆ—j=1Nβˆ’1(A,ΞΈ))βˆ—ii∘θ,ΞΈA.\ast_{j=1}^{N}(A,\theta)=\left(\ast_{j=1}^{N-1}(A,\theta)\right)\ast_{i_{i}\circ\theta,\theta}A.

By the induction assumption there is an embedding Ο•:βˆ—j=1Nβˆ’1(A,ΞΈ)β†’βˆMn/βŠ•Mn\phi:\ast_{j=1}^{N-1}(A,\theta)\to\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{n}. We define Ο•N:Aβ†’βˆMn/βŠ•Mn\phi_{N}:A\to\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{n} by

Ο•N=Ο•βˆ˜i1.\phi_{N}=\phi\circ i_{1}.

Then Ο•N∘θ=Ο•βˆ˜Δ±1∘θ\phi_{N}\circ\theta=\phi\circ\char 16\relax_{1}\circ\theta. By Theorem 20 βˆ—j=1N(A,ΞΈ)\ast_{j=1}^{N}(A,\theta) is MF. ∎

Theorem 22.

Let Aj,A_{j}, j=1,…,Nj=1,\ldots,N, and CC be separable C*-algebras and ΞΈj:Cβ†’Aj\theta_{j}:C\to A_{j}, j=1,…,Nj=1,\ldots,N, be inclusions. Then βˆ—j=1N(Aj,ΞΈj)\ast_{j=1}^{N}(A_{j},\theta_{j}) is MF if and only if there exist embeddings Ο•j:Ajβ†’βˆMn/βŠ•Mn\phi_{j}:A_{j}\to\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{n}, j=1,…,Nj=1,\ldots,N, such that Ο•j∘θj=Ο•k∘θk\phi_{j}\circ\theta_{j}=\phi_{k}\circ\theta_{k}, for all j,k≀Nj,k\leq N.

Proof.

”Only if” is clear. We prove the ”if” part by induction. Lemma 19 holds for more factors than two and therefore, similar to the proof of Theorem 20, it is sufficient to consider the unital case. To avoid cumbersome notation, we will show how to prove the statement for three factors. For four and more it is similar. We have

βˆ—j=13(Aj,ΞΈj)=(A1βˆ—ΞΈ1,ΞΈ2A2)βˆ—i1∘θ1,ΞΈ3A3.\ast_{j=1}^{3}(A_{j},\theta_{j})=(A_{1}\ast_{\theta_{1},\theta_{2}}A_{2})\ast_{i_{1}\circ\theta_{1},\theta_{3}}A_{3}.

By Remark 18, Ο•1βˆ—Ο•2:A1βˆ—ΞΈ1,ΞΈ2A2β†’(∏Mn/βŠ•Mn)βˆ—Ο•1∘θ1​(C)(∏Mn/βŠ•Mn)\phi_{1}\ast\phi_{2}:A_{1}\ast_{\theta_{1},\theta_{2}}A_{2}\to\left(\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{n}\right)\ast_{\phi_{1}\circ\theta_{1}(C)}\left(\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{n}\right) is an inclusion. We define Ο•~3:A3β†’(∏Mn/βŠ•Mn)βˆ—Ο•1∘θ1​(C)(∏Mn/βŠ•Mn)\tilde{\phi}_{3}:A_{3}\to\left(\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{n}\right)\ast_{\phi_{1}\circ\theta_{1}(C)}\left(\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{n}\right) by

Ο•~3=i1βˆ˜Ο•3.\tilde{\phi}_{3}=i_{1}\circ\phi_{3}.

Then

Ο•~3∘θ3​(c)=i1​(Ο•3​(ΞΈ3​(c)))=i1​(Ο•1​(ΞΈ1​(c)))=(Ο•1βˆ—Ο•2)∘(i1∘θ1)​(c).\tilde{\phi}_{3}\circ\theta_{3}(c)=i_{1}(\phi_{3}(\theta_{3}(c)))=i_{1}(\phi_{1}(\theta_{1}(c)))=(\phi_{1}\ast\phi_{2})\circ(i_{1}\circ\theta_{1})(c).

By Lemma 21 there is an embedding

Ξ±:(∏Mn/βŠ•Mn)βˆ—Ο•1∘θ1​(C)(∏Mn/βŠ•Mn)β†’βˆMn/βŠ•Mn.\alpha:\left(\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{n}\right)\ast_{\phi_{1}\circ\theta_{1}(C)}\left(\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{n}\right)\to\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{n}.

Then Ξ±βˆ˜Ο•~3\alpha\circ\tilde{\phi}_{3} and α∘(Ο•1βˆ—Ο•2)\alpha\circ(\phi_{1}\ast\phi_{2}) satisfy the necessary and sufficient condition of Theorem 20, and therefore βˆ—j=13(Aj,ΞΈj)\ast_{j=1}^{3}(A_{j},\theta_{j}) is MF. ∎

4 Amalgamated free products of amenable groups

The next theorem shows that for amalgamated free products of amenable groups the necessary and sufficient condition of Theorem 20 holds automatically.

Theorem 23.

If G1G_{1} and G2G_{2} are amenable groups, then Cβˆ—β€‹(G1βˆ—HG2)C^{*}(G_{1}\ast_{H}G_{2}) is MF.

Proof.

Let 𝒬\mathcal{Q} denote the UHF-algebra βŠ—d=1∞Md\otimes_{d=1}^{\infty}M_{d}. By [23, Th. 2.5] there exist unital embeddings ρi:Cβˆ—β€‹(Gi)→𝒬\rho_{i}:C^{*}(G_{i})\to\mathcal{Q}, i=1,2i=1,2, such that

t​r𝒬​ρ1​(g1)=0=t​r𝒬​ρ2​(g2),tr_{\mathcal{Q}}\rho_{1}(g_{1})=0=tr_{\mathcal{Q}}\rho_{2}(g_{2}),

for any g1∈G1βˆ–{1},g2∈G2βˆ–{1}g_{1}\in G_{1}\setminus\{1\},g_{2}\in G_{2}\setminus\{1\}. In particular

t​r𝒬​ρ1​(ΞΈ1​(h))=0=t​r𝒬​ρ2​(ΞΈ2​(h)),tr_{\mathcal{Q}}\rho_{1}(\theta_{1}(h))=0=tr_{\mathcal{Q}}\rho_{2}(\theta_{2}(h)),

for any h∈Hβˆ–{1}h\in H\setminus\{1\}. By [23, Th. 2.5] there exist unitaries unβˆˆπ’¬u_{n}\in\mathcal{Q} such that

ρ1​(ΞΈ1​(h))=limnβ†’βˆžunβˆ—β€‹Ο2​(ΞΈ2​(h))​un,\rho_{1}(\theta_{1}(h))=\lim_{n\to\infty}u_{n}^{*}\rho_{2}(\theta_{2}(h))u_{n},

for any h∈Hh\in H. Let 𝒬ω\mathcal{Q}_{\omega} be the norm ultraproduct of 𝒬\mathcal{Q} and let q:βˆπ’¬β†’π’¬Ο‰q:\prod\mathcal{Q}\to\mathcal{Q}_{\omega} be the canonical surjection. We define embeddings ρ~i:Cβˆ—β€‹(Gi)→𝒬ω\tilde{\rho}_{i}:C^{*}(G_{i})\to\mathcal{Q}_{\omega}, i=1,2i=1,2, by

ρ~1=q∘(ρ1)nβˆˆβ„•,\tilde{\rho}_{1}=q\circ\left(\rho_{1}\right)_{n\in\mathbb{N}},
ρ~2=q∘(unβˆ—β€‹Ο2​un)nβˆˆβ„•.\tilde{\rho}_{2}=q\circ\left(u_{n}^{*}\rho_{2}u_{n}\right)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}.

Then

ρ~1∘θ1​(h)=ρ~2​(ΞΈ2​(h)),\tilde{\rho}_{1}\circ\theta_{1}(h)=\tilde{\rho}_{2}(\theta_{2}(h)),

h∈Hh\in H. Since MF is a local porperty, 𝒬ω\mathcal{Q}_{\omega} is an MF-algebra [22, Prop. 3.2 (3)]. Let Ξ±:π’¬Ο‰β†’βˆMn/βŠ•MN\alpha:\mathcal{Q}_{\omega}\to\prod M_{n}/\oplus M_{N} be an embedding. Let Ο•i=α∘ρ~i,\phi_{i}=\alpha\circ\tilde{\rho}_{i}, i=1,2i=1,2. Then Ο•1,Ο•2\phi_{1},\phi_{2} satisfy the necessary and sufficient condition of Theorem 20. Therefore Cβˆ—β€‹(G1βˆ—HG2)C^{*}(G_{1}\ast_{H}G_{2}) is MF. ∎

Remark 24.

By the same arguments and Theorem 22, Theorem 23 generalizes to amalgamated free products of arbitrarily many amenable groups.

Example 25.

Let us consider the Baumslag-Solitar group BS(1,n)=⟨a,t|tβˆ’1at=an⟩.BS(1,n)=\left<a,t|t^{-1}at=a^{n}\right>. Out of two copies of B​S​(1,n)BS(1,n) one can form three natural examples of free products amalgamated over an infinite cyclic group:

G1=B​S​(1,n)βˆ—βŸ¨t1=t2⟩B​S​(1,n),G_{1}=BS(1,n)\ast_{\left<t_{1}=t_{2}\right>}BS(1,n),
G2=B​S​(1,n)βˆ—βŸ¨a1=a2⟩B​S​(1,n),G_{2}=BS(1,n)\ast_{\left<a_{1}=a_{2}\right>}BS(1,n),
G3=B​S​(1,n)βˆ—βŸ¨a1=t2⟩B​S​(1,n).G_{3}=BS(1,n)\ast_{\left<a_{1}=t_{2}\right>}BS(1,n).

All three C*-algebras Cβˆ—β€‹(Gi)C^{*}(G_{i}), i=1,2,3i=1,2,3, are MF by Theorem 23 (for Cβˆ—β€‹(G1)C^{*}(G_{1}) and Cβˆ—β€‹(G2)C^{*}(G_{2}) this follows already from Theorem 10). In fact Cβˆ—β€‹(G1)C^{*}(G_{1}) is RFD [29, Prop. 5.9].

The group G3G_{3} is a building block of the famous Higman’s group Hβ‰…G3βˆ—π”½2G3.H\cong G_{3}\ast_{\mathbb{F}_{2}}G_{3}. Higman’s group has always been considered as a candidate for counterexample to the approximation conjectures. Now we at least we can see that its building blocks are MF.

Below we find some sufficient condition for amalgamated free products of groups to have RFD full group C*-algebra.

A C*-algebra is residually finite-dimensional (RFD) if it has a separating family of finite-dimensional representations.

A group is called maximally almost periodic (MAP) if it has a separating family of finite-dimensional representations. E.g. any residually finite group is MAP.

The full group C*-algebra of a MAP group might not be RFD as discovered by Bekka [3]. In [28] it was proved that for a large class of amenable groups (e.g. all polycyclic-by-finite groups) free products with amalgamation over central subgroups are RFD. Here we show that amalgamated free products of amenable groups with amalgamation over finite subgroups are RFD.

Below, given a homomorphism ΞΈ:Hβ†’G\theta:H\to G, the induced βˆ—\ast-homomorphism Cβˆ—β€‹(H)β†’Cβˆ—β€‹(G)C^{*}(H)\to C^{*}(G) will also be denoted by ΞΈ\theta.

Proposition 26.

Suppose G1G_{1} and G2G_{2} are amenable, ΞΈk:Hβ†’Gk\theta_{k}:H\to G_{k}, k=1,2k=1,2, are embeddings, and the corresponding amalgamated free product G1βˆ—HG2G_{1}\ast_{H}G_{2} is MAP. Then there exist embeddings jk:Cβˆ—β€‹(Gk)β†ͺ∏Mnj_{k}:C^{*}(G_{k})\hookrightarrow\prod M_{n} such that j1∘θ1=j2∘θ2j_{1}\circ\theta_{1}=j_{2}\circ\theta_{2}.

Proof.

Since G1βˆ—HG2G_{1}\ast_{H}G_{2} is MAP, delta-function on it can be written as

Ξ΄e=limnβ†’βˆžt​r​πn,\delta_{e}=\lim_{n\to\infty}tr\;\pi_{n},

for some finite-dimensional representations Ο€n\pi_{n} of G1βˆ—HG2G_{1}\ast_{H}G_{2} ([13, Prop.3]). Then

Ξ΄e|ik​(Gk)=limnβ†’βˆžt​r​πn|ik​(Gk),\delta_{e}|_{i_{k}(G_{k})}=\lim_{n\to\infty}tr\;\pi_{n}|_{i_{k}(G_{k})}, (4)

k=1,2k=1,2. Since GkG_{k} is amenable, delta-function on it extends to a faithful trace on Cβˆ—β€‹(Gk)C^{*}(G_{k}). Therefore, (4) implies that

jk:=∏nΟ€n|ik​(Gk):Cβˆ—β€‹(Gk)β†’βˆMnj_{k}:=\prod_{n}\pi_{n}|_{i_{k}(G_{k})}:C^{*}(G_{k})\to\prod M_{n}

is injective. We have

j1∘θ1​(h)=∏nΟ€n​(i1​(ΞΈ1​(h)))=∏nΟ€n​(i2​(ΞΈ2​(h)))=j2∘θ2​(h),j_{1}\circ\theta_{1}(h)=\prod_{n}\pi_{n}(i_{1}(\theta_{1}(h)))=\prod_{n}\pi_{n}(i_{2}(\theta_{2}(h)))=j_{2}\circ\theta_{2}(h),

h∈Hh\in H, and therefore j1∘θ1​(x)=j2∘θ2​(x)j_{1}\circ\theta_{1}(x)=j_{2}\circ\theta_{2}(x), for any x∈Cβˆ—β€‹(H)x\in C^{*}(H). ∎

Corollary 27.

If G1,G2G_{1},G_{2} are amenable residually finite groups and HH is a finite subgroup of them, then Cβˆ—β€‹(G1βˆ—HG2)C^{*}(G_{1}\ast_{H}G_{2}) is RFD.

Proof.

If G1,G2G_{1},G_{2} are amenable residually finite and HH is finite, then G1βˆ—HG2G_{1}\ast_{H}G_{2} is RF ([2]), hence is MAP. By Proposition 26 there exist embeddings jk:Cβˆ—β€‹(Gk)β†ͺ∏Mnj_{k}:C^{*}(G_{k})\hookrightarrow\prod M_{n} such that j1∘θ1=j2∘θ2j_{1}\circ\theta_{1}=j_{2}\circ\theta_{2}. Since Cβˆ—β€‹(H)C^{*}(H) is finite-dimensional, by [16] Cβˆ—β€‹(G1βˆ—HG2)C^{*}(G_{1}\ast_{H}G_{2}) is RFD. ∎

5 Central HNN-extensions and maximal tensor product with Cβˆ—β€‹(Fn)C^{*}(F_{n})

Below βŠ—\otimes stands for the maximal tensor product.

Theorem 28.

Let Nβˆˆβ„•βˆͺ{∞}N\in\mathbb{N}\cup\{\infty\}. If a C*-algebra AA is MF, then AβŠ—Cβˆ—β€‹(FN)A\otimes C^{*}(F_{N}) is MF.

Proof.

Let Ο€:AβŠ—Cβˆ—β€‹(FN)β†’B⁑(H)\pi:A\otimes C^{*}(F_{N})\to B(H) be an embedding. We define a representation Ο€β€²:AβŠ—Cβˆ—β€‹(FN)β†’B⁑(H)\pi^{\prime}:A\otimes C^{*}(F_{N})\to B(H) by

π′​(a)=π⁑(a),a∈A,\pi^{\prime}(a)=\pi(a),\;a\in A,
π′​(ui)=βˆ’Ο€β€‹(ui)βˆ—,\pi^{\prime}(u_{i})=-\pi(u_{i})^{*},

for each generator uiu_{i} of Cβˆ—β€‹(FN)C^{*}(F_{N}). Let Ο€~=Ο€βŠ•Ο€β€²\tilde{\pi}=\pi\oplus\pi^{\prime}. Since AA is MF, by Theorem 4 Ο€|A\pi|_{A} lifts to a discrete asymptotic homomorphism Ο•k:Aβ†’π’Ÿ\phi_{k}:A\to\mathcal{D}, kβˆˆβ„•k\in\mathbb{N}. Then Ο€~|A\tilde{\pi}|_{A} lifts to the discrete asymptotic homomorphism Ο•~k=Ο•kβŠ•Ο•k,\tilde{\phi}_{k}=\phi_{k}\oplus\phi_{k}, kβˆˆβ„•k\in\mathbb{N}. Let {a1,a2,…}\{a_{1},a_{2},\ldots\} be a dense subset of AA. By Lemma 9 for each kβˆˆβ„•k\in\mathbb{N} there is a lift Vi,kV_{i,k} of the generator uiu_{i} of FNF_{N}, i≀ki\leq k, such that

β€–[Vi,k,Ο•~k​(al)]β€–<1k,\|[V_{i,k},\tilde{\phi}_{k}(a_{l})]\|<\frac{1}{k},

l≀kl\leq k. Thus Vi,kV_{i,k}’s and Ο•~k​(a)\tilde{\phi}_{k}(a)’s, a∈Aa\in A, asymptotically satisfy the relations of AβŠ—Cβˆ—β€‹(FN)A\otimes C^{*}(F_{N}). By [26, Lemma 7 + Rem. 8], there exists a discrete asymptotic homomorphism from AβŠ—Cβˆ—β€‹(FN)A\otimes C^{*}(F_{N}) to M2​(π’Ÿ)M_{2}(\mathcal{D}) that lifts Ο€~\tilde{\pi}. By Theorem 4, AβŠ—Cβˆ—β€‹(FN)A\otimes C^{*}(F_{N}) is MF. ∎

Let AA be a unital Cβˆ—C^{*}-algebra, BB and CC its C*-subalgebras, and Ο•:Bβ†’C\phi:B\to C an isomorphism. The corresponding HNN-extension ⟨A,t|tβˆ’1Bt=C,Ο•βŸ©\langle A,t\;|\;t^{-1}Bt=C,\;\phi\rangle is a unital C*-algebra with the following properties:

1) There exists a unital βˆ—\ast-homomorphism iA:Aβ†’βŸ¨A,t|tβˆ’1Bt=C,Ο•βŸ©i_{A}:A\to\langle A,t\;|\;t^{-1}Bt=C,\;\phi\rangle and a unitary t∈⟨A,t|tβˆ’1Bt=C,Ο•βŸ©t\in\langle A,t\;|\;t^{-1}Bt=C,\;\phi\rangle such that

tβˆ’1​iA​(b)​t=iA​(ϕ⁑(b)),t^{-1}i_{A}(b)t=i_{A}(\phi(b)),

for any b∈Bb\in B.

2) For any unital C*-algebra DD and any unitary u∈Du\in D and unital βˆ—\ast-homomorphism Ο€:Aβ†’D\pi:A\to D such that uβˆ’1​π​(b)​u=π⁑(ϕ⁑(b))u^{-1}\pi(b)u=\pi(\phi(b)), for any b∈Bb\in B, there is a unique βˆ—\ast-homomorphism Οƒ:⟨A,t|tβˆ’1Bt=C,Ο•βŸ©β†’D\sigma:\langle A,t\;|\;t^{-1}Bt=C,\;\phi\rangle\to D such that Οƒβˆ˜iA=Ο€,σ⁑(t)=u.\sigma\circ i_{A}=\pi,\;\sigma(t)=u.

Such C*-algebra exists and is unique up to isomorphism. An HNN-extension is central if B=CB=C and Ο•=i​d\phi=id. We will show that the MF-property passes to central HNN-extensions.

Below we identify AA with iA​(A)i_{A}(A) to simplify notation.

Theorem 29.

Let AA be an MF-algebra and BB its C*-subalgebra. Then the HNN-extension ⟨A,t|tβˆ’1Bt=B,id⟩\langle A,t\;|\;t^{-1}Bt=B,\;id\rangle is MF.

Proof.

Similar to the proof of Th. 28. Let Ο€:⟨A,t|tβˆ’1Bt=B,idβŸ©β†’B(H)\pi:\langle A,t\;|\;t^{-1}Bt=B,\;id\rangle\to B(H) be an embedding. We define a representation Ο€β€²:⟨A,t|tβˆ’1Bt=B,idβŸ©β†’B(H)\pi^{\prime}:\langle A,t\;|\;t^{-1}Bt=B,\;id\rangle\to B(H) by

π′​(a)=π⁑(a),a∈A,\pi^{\prime}(a)=\pi(a),\;a\in A,
π′​(t)=βˆ’Ο€β€‹(t)βˆ—.\pi^{\prime}(t)=-\pi(t)^{*}.

Let Ο€~=Ο€βŠ•Ο€β€²\tilde{\pi}=\pi\oplus\pi^{\prime}. Since AA is MF, by Theorem 4 Ο€|A\pi|_{A} lifts to a discrete asymptotic homomorphism Ο•n:Aβ†’π’Ÿ\phi_{n}:A\to\mathcal{D}, nβˆˆβ„•n\in\mathbb{N}. Then Ο€~|A\tilde{\pi}|_{A} lifts to the discrete asymptotic homomorphism Ο•~n=Ο•nβŠ•Ο•n\tilde{\phi}_{n}=\phi_{n}\oplus\phi_{n}, nβˆˆβ„•n\in\mathbb{N}. Let {b1,b2,…}\{b_{1},b_{2},\ldots\} be a dense subset of BB. By Lemma 9 Ο€~​(t)\tilde{\pi}(t) lifts to a unitary VnV_{n} of such that

β€–[Vn,Ο•~n​(bi)]β€–<1n,\|[V_{n},\tilde{\phi}_{n}(b_{i})]\|<\frac{1}{n},

i≀ni\leq n. By [26, Lemma 7 + Rem. 8], there exists a discrete asymptotic homomorphism from ⟨A,t|tβˆ’1Bt=B,id⟩\langle A,t\;|\;t^{-1}Bt=B,\;id\rangle to M2​(π’Ÿ)M_{2}(\mathcal{D}) that lifts Ο€~\tilde{\pi}. By Theorem 4 ⟨A,t|tβˆ’1Bt=B,id⟩\langle A,t\;|\;t^{-1}Bt=B,\;id\rangle is MF. ∎

Corollary 30.

If Cβˆ—β€‹(H)C^{*}(H) is MF and GG is a right-angled Artin group, then Cβˆ—β€‹(HΓ—G)C^{*}(H\times G) is MF.

Proof.

Induction on the number kk of vertices of the defining graph Ξ“\Gamma of GG. If k=1k=1, Cβˆ—β€‹(G)=Cβˆ—β€‹(β„€)C^{*}(G)=C^{*}(\mathbb{Z}) and the statement holds by Theorem 28. Suppose it is proved for k≀nβˆ’1k\leq n-1. Let vv be one of vertices of Ξ“\Gamma, let Ξ“1\Gamma_{1} be the graph obtained from Ξ“\Gamma by removing vv and all the edges coming from vv, and let G1G_{1} be the right-angled Artin group defined by Ξ“1\Gamma_{1}. Then

Cβˆ—(HΓ—G)=⟨Cβˆ—(HΓ—G1),t|tβˆ’1Bt=B,id⟩,C^{*}(H\times G)=\langle C^{*}(H\times G_{1}),t\;|\;t^{-1}Bt=B,\;id\rangle,

where BB is the C*-subalgebra of Cβˆ—β€‹(HΓ—G1)C^{*}(H\times G_{1}) generated by Cβˆ—β€‹(H)C^{*}(H) and {w∈V⁑(Ξ“1)|[w,v]=0}\{w\in V(\Gamma_{1})\;|\;[w,v]=0\}. Theorem 29 finishes the proof. ∎

Remark 31.

It is known that if GG is a right-angled Artin group, then Cβˆ—β€‹(G)C^{*}(G) is not only MF, but is even quasidiagonal [1, Th. 4.8].

6 Crossed products

Let AA be a unital C*-algebra and GG a group that acts on AA by automorphisms. We will identify AA and GG with their canonical images in Aβ‹ŠGA\rtimes G. We will identify GG and HH with their canonical images in Gβˆ—FHG\ast_{F}H.

Proposition 32.

Aβ‹Š(Gβˆ—FH)β‰…(Aβ‹ŠG)βˆ—Aβ‹ŠF(Aβ‹ŠH)A\rtimes(G\ast_{F}H)\cong(A\rtimes G)\ast_{A\rtimes F}(A\rtimes H).

Proof.

Let

i1:Aβ‹ŠGβ†’(Aβ‹ŠG)βˆ—Aβ‹ŠF(Aβ‹ŠH),i_{1}:A\rtimes G\to(A\rtimes G)\ast_{A\rtimes F}(A\rtimes H),
i2:Aβ‹ŠHβ†’(Aβ‹ŠG)βˆ—Aβ‹ŠF(Aβ‹ŠH)i_{2}:A\rtimes H\to(A\rtimes G)\ast_{A\rtimes F}(A\rtimes H)

be the canonical inclusions. We define Ξ±A:Aβ†’(Aβ‹ŠG)βˆ—Aβ‹ŠF(Aβ‹ŠH)\alpha_{A}:A\to(A\rtimes G)\ast_{A\rtimes F}(A\rtimes H) by

Ξ±A​(a)=i1​(a)≑i2​(a),\alpha_{A}(a)=i_{1}(a)\equiv i_{2}(a),

a∈Aa\in A. We define Ξ±Gβˆ—FH:Gβˆ—FHβ†’(Aβ‹ŠG)βˆ—Aβ‹ŠF(Aβ‹ŠH)\alpha_{G\ast_{F}H}:G\ast_{F}H\to(A\rtimes G)\ast_{A\rtimes F}(A\rtimes H) by

Ξ±Gβˆ—FH​(g1​h1​…​gN​hN)=i1​(g1)​i2​(h1)​…​i1​(gN)​i2​(hN),\alpha_{G\ast_{F}H}(g_{1}h_{1}\ldots g_{N}h_{N})=i_{1}(g_{1})i_{2}(h_{1})\ldots i_{1}(g_{N})i_{2}(h_{N}),

g1,…,gN∈G,h1,…​hN∈H,Nβˆˆβ„•g_{1},\ldots,g_{N}\in G,h_{1},\ldots h_{N}\in H,N\in\mathbb{N}. Since the amalgamated C*-subalgebra in (Aβ‹ŠG)βˆ—Aβ‹ŠF(Aβ‹ŠH)(A\rtimes G)\ast_{A\rtimes F}(A\rtimes H) contains both AA and FF, both Ξ±A\alpha_{A} and Ξ±Gβˆ—FH\alpha_{G\ast_{F}H} are well-defined. We have

Ξ±Gβˆ—FH​(g1​h1​…​gN​hN)​αA​(a)​αGβˆ—FH​(g1​h1​…​gN​hN)βˆ’1=i1​(g1)​i2​(h1)​…​i1​(gN)​i2​(hN)​i2​(a)​i2​(hNβˆ’1)​i1​(gNβˆ’1)​…​i2​(h1βˆ’1)​i1​(g1βˆ’1)=i1​(g1)​i2​(h1)​…​i1​(gN)​i1​(hN​a)​i1​(gNβˆ’1)​…​i2​(h1βˆ’1)​i1​(g1βˆ’1)=…=i1​(g1​h1​…​gN​hn​a)=Ξ±A​(g1​h1​…​gN​hN​a).\alpha_{G\ast_{F}H}(g_{1}h_{1}\ldots g_{N}h_{N})\alpha_{A}(a)\alpha_{G\ast_{F}H}(g_{1}h_{1}\ldots g_{N}h_{N})^{-1}\\ =i_{1}(g_{1})i_{2}(h_{1})\ldots i_{1}(g_{N})i_{2}(h_{N})i_{2}(a)i_{2}(h_{N}^{-1})i_{1}(g_{N}^{-1})\ldots i_{2}(h_{1}^{-1})i_{1}(g_{1}^{-1})\\ =i_{1}(g_{1})i_{2}(h_{1})\ldots i_{1}(g_{N})i_{1}(h_{N}a)i_{1}(g_{N}^{-1})\ldots i_{2}(h_{1}^{-1})i_{1}(g_{1}^{-1})\\ =\ldots=i_{1}(g_{1}h_{1}\ldots g_{N}h_{n}a)=\alpha_{A}(g_{1}h_{1}\ldots g_{N}h_{N}a).

Thus Ξ±A\alpha_{A}, Ξ±Gβˆ—FH\alpha_{G\ast_{F}H} is a covariant pair and therefore defines a βˆ—\ast-homomorphism

Ξ±:Aβ‹Š(Gβˆ—FH)β†’(Aβ‹ŠG)βˆ—Aβ‹ŠF(Aβ‹ŠH)\alpha:A\rtimes(G\ast_{F}H)\to(A\rtimes G)\ast_{A\rtimes F}(A\rtimes H)

such that

Ξ±|A=Ξ±A,Ξ±|Gβˆ—FH=Ξ±Gβˆ—FH.\alpha|_{A}=\alpha_{A},\;\alpha|_{G\ast_{F}H}=\alpha_{G\ast_{F}H}.

We define

Ξ²:(Aβ‹ŠG)βˆ—Aβ‹ŠF(Aβ‹ŠH)β†’Aβ‹Š(Gβˆ—FH)\beta:(A\rtimes G)\ast_{A\rtimes F}(A\rtimes H)\to A\rtimes(G\ast_{F}H)

by

β​(i1​(a))=a,\beta(i_{1}(a))=a,
β​(i1​(g))=g,\beta(i_{1}(g))=g,
β​(i2​(a))=a,\beta(i_{2}(a))=a,
β​(i2​(h))=h,\beta(i_{2}(h))=h,

a∈A,g∈G,h∈Ha\in A,g\in G,h\in H. Since β⁑(i1​(a))=β⁑(i2​(a))\beta(i_{1}(a))=\beta(i_{2}(a)) and β⁑(i1​(f))=β⁑(i2​(f))\beta(i_{1}(f))=\beta(i_{2}(f)), Ξ²\beta is a well-defined βˆ—\ast-homomorphism. It is straightforward to check that α∘β=i​d\alpha\circ\beta=id and β∘α=i​d\beta\circ\alpha=id.

∎

Remark 33.

In the proposition above the amalgamated free product of two factors can be replaced by amalgamated free product of more than two factors.

Corollary 34.

Cβˆ—β€‹(β„€2β‹ŠS​L2​(β„€))C^{*}(\mathbb{Z}^{2}\rtimes SL_{2}(\mathbb{Z})) is MF.

Proof.

S​L2​(β„€)β‰…β„€4βˆ—β„€2β„€6SL_{2}(\mathbb{Z})\cong\mathbb{Z}_{4}\ast_{\mathbb{Z}_{2}}\mathbb{Z}_{6} ([25]). Therefore by Proposition 32

β„€2β‹ŠS​L2​(β„€)β‰…(β„€2β‹Šβ„€4)βˆ—β„€2β‹Šβ„€2(β„€2β‹Šβ„€6).\mathbb{Z}^{2}\rtimes SL_{2}(\mathbb{Z})\cong\left(\mathbb{Z}^{2}\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_{4}\right)\ast_{\mathbb{Z}^{2}\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_{2}}\left(\mathbb{Z}^{2}\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_{6}\right).

Since Z2β‹Šβ„€4Z^{2}\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_{4} and β„€2β‹Šβ„€6\mathbb{Z}^{2}\rtimes\mathbb{Z}_{6} are amenable, by Theorem 23 Cβˆ—β€‹(β„€2β‹ŠS​L2​(β„€))C^{*}(\mathbb{Z}^{2}\rtimes SL_{2}(\mathbb{Z})) is MF. ∎

Corollary 35.

For any semidirect product Gβ‹Šπ”½nG\rtimes\mathbb{F}_{n} of an amenable group GG by a free group 𝔽n\mathbb{F}_{n}, Cβˆ—β€‹(Gβ‹Šπ”½n)C^{*}(G\rtimes\mathbb{F}_{n}) is MF.

Proof.

By Proposition 32 and Remark 33, Gβ‹Šπ”½nG\rtimes\mathbb{F}_{n} is a free product of Gβ‹Šβ„€G\rtimes\mathbb{Z} amalgamated over GG. Since Gβ‹Šβ„€G\rtimes\mathbb{Z} is amenable, the statement follows from Theorem 23 and Remark 24. ∎

References

  • [1] S. Atkinson, Some results on tracial stability and graph products, Indiana University Mathematics Journal 70(3): 1167-1187, 2021.
  • [2] G. Baumslag, On the residual finiteness of generalized free products of nilpotent groups, TAMS 106:193-209, 1963.
  • [3] B. Bekka, On the full C*-algebras of arithmetic groups and the congruence subgroup problem, Forum Math. 11:705-715, 1999.
  • [4] B. Blackadar and E. Kirchberg, Generalized inductive limits of finite dimensional C*-algebras, Math. Ann. 307:343-380, 1997.
  • [5] N. Brown, Invariant Means and Finite Representation Theory of C*-algebras, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society 184(865), 2013.
  • [6] J. Carrion, M. Dadarlat, and C. Eckhardt, On groups with quasidiagonal C*-algebras, J. Funct. Anal. 265(1): 135-152, 2013.
  • [7] A. Connes and N. Higson, Deformations, morphismes asymptotiques et K-theorie bivariante, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, I. Ser., Math. 311: 101-106, 1990.
  • [8] M. Dadarlat, A note on asymptotic homomorphisms, K-Theory 8: 465–482, 1994.
  • [9] D. Enders and T. Shulman, On the (Local) Lifting Property, arXiv:2403.12224.
  • [10] U. Haagerup and S. Thorbjornsen, A new application of random matrices: E​x​t​(Cr​e​dβˆ—β€‹(𝔽2))Ext(C^{*}_{red}(\mathbb{F}_{2})) is not a group, Ann. of Math. (2), 162(2):711-775, 2005.
  • [11] D. Hadwin, Q. Li and J. Shen, Topological free entropy dimensions in Nuclear C*-algebras and in Full Free Products of Unital C*-algebras, Canad. J. Math. 63, 2011.
  • [12] D. Hadwin and T. Shulman, Tracial stability for C*-algebras, Int. Eq. Op. Th. 90:1, 2018.
  • [13] D. Hadwin and T. Shulman, Stability of group relations under small Hilbert-Schmidt perturbations, J. Funct. Anal. 275 (4):761-792, 2018.
  • [14] G. Higman, A finitely related group with an isomorphic proper factor group, J. London Math. Soc. 26: 59-61, 1951.
  • [15] A. Ioana and P. Spaas: I​I1II_{1} factors with exotic central sequence algebras, J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 20: 1671-1696, 2021.
  • [16] Q. Li and J. Shen, A note on unital full amalgamated free products of RFD Cβˆ—C^{*}-algebras, Illinois J. Math. 56:647-659, 2012.
  • [17] T. Loring, Lifting solutions to perturbing problems in C*-algebras, volume 8 of Fields Institute Monographs. AMS, Providence, RI, 1997.
  • [18] A. Lubotzky and Y. Shalom, Finite representations in the unitary dual and Ramanujan groups, Discrete geometric analysis: proceedings of the first JAMS Symposium on Discrete Geometric Analysis, December 12-20, 2002, Sendai, Japan, Contemporary Mathematics 347:173-189, 2004.
  • [19] M. Magee and M. de la Salle, S​L4​(β„€)SL_{4}(\mathbb{Z}) is not purely matricial field, Comptes Rendus MathΓ©matique 362: 903-910, 2024.
  • [20] V. Manuilov, Asymptotic homomorphisms of C*-algebras and C*-extensions, J. Math. Sciences 123(4), 2004.
  • [21] V. Manuilov and K. Thomsen, The Connes-Higson construction is an isomorphism, Journal of Functional Analysis 213: 154-175, 2004.
  • [22] T. Rainone and C. Schafhauser, Crossed products of nuclear C*-algebras by free groups and their traces, Adv. Math., 347: 105-149, 2019.
  • [23] C. Schafhauser, Finite dimensional approximations for certain amalgamated free products of groups, to appear in Groups, Geom. Dym., 2023.
  • [24] C. Schafhauser, A new proof of the Tikuisis-White-Winter Theorem, J. Reine Angew. Math. 759: 291-304, 2020.
  • [25] J-P. Serre, Trees, Springer-Verlag, 1980.
  • [26] T. Shulman, Sections and cones, arXiv:2507.22783.
  • [27] T. Shulman, Homotopy lifting, asymptotic homomorphisms, and traces, arXiv:2508.00125.
  • [28] T. Shulman, Central amalgamation of groups and the RFD property, Advances in Mathematics 394 (22), 2022.
  • [29] T. Shulman and A. Skalski, RFD property for groupoid C*-algebras of amenable groupoids and for crossed products by amenable actions, arXiv:2305.12122.
  • [30] A. Tikuisis, S. White, and W. Winter, Quasidiagonality of nuclear C*-algebras, Annals of Math. (2), 185: 229-284, 2017.