Skip to main content
Log in

Freshwater inflow: Science, policy, management

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The papers in this special issue were presented in a special session during the 2001 biennial conference of the Estuarine Research Federation held in St. Pete Beach, Florida. The session, “Freshwater inflow: Science, policy and management,” was focused on issues related to reduced freshwater inflow to estuaries. The session brought together scientists, managers, and regulators, and included presentations on the estimation of freshwater input to estuaries, development of ecological indicators to assess changes in inflow, management strategies used to set freshwater requirements, and experiences with the reintroduction of freshwater to restore inflow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Adams, J. B., G. C. Bate, T. D. Harrison, P. Huizinga, S. Taljaard, L. van Niekerk, E. E. Plumstead, A. K. Whitfield, andT. H. Wooldridge. 2002. A method to assess the freshwater inflow requirements of estuaries and application to the Mtata estuary, South Africa.Estuaries 25:1382–1393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alber, M. 2002. A conceptual model of estuarine freshwater inflow management.Estuaries, 25:1246–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B. J. 1966. Effects of decreased river flow on estuarine ecology.Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 38: 1831–1839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R. and D. Williams (eds.). 1981. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Freshwater Inflow to Estuaries. FWS/OBS-81/04. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services.

  • Culliton, T. J. 1998. Population: Distribution, density and growth. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's State of the Coast Report. Silver Spring, Maryland.

  • Doering, P. H., R. H. Chamberlain, andD. E. Haunert. 2002. Using submerged aquatic vegetation to establish minimum and maximum freshwater inflows to the Caloosahatchee estuary, Florida.Estuaries 25:1343–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynesius, M. andC. Nilsson. 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world.Science 266:753–762.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, M. S., E. B. Peebles, andR. T. Montgomery. 2002. A percentage-of-streamflow approach for managing reductions of freshwater inflows from unimpounded rivers to southwest Florida estuaries.Estuaries 25:1318–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoese, H. D. 1967. Effects of higher than normal salinities on salt marshes.Contributions to Marine Science 12:249–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer, W. J. 2002. Physical, biological, and management responses to variable freshwater flow into the San Francisco estuary.Estuaries 25:1275–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longley, W. L. (Ed.). 1994. Freshwater inflows to Texas bays and estuaries: Ecological relationships and methods for determination of needs. Texas Water Development Board and Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, R. A. 2002. A resource-based framework fore freshwater inflow requirements for the Suwannee River estuary.Estuaries 25:1333–1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagna, P. A., R. D. Kalke, andC. Ritter. 2002. Effect of restored freshwater inflows on macrofauna and meiofauna in upper Rincon Bayou, Texas, USA.Estuaries 25:1436–1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R. J., J. J. Magnuson, D. M. McKnight, J. A. Stanford, andJ. R. Karr. 1995. Freshwater ecosystems and their management: A national initiative.Science 270:584–585.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Postel, S. L., G. C. Daily, andP. R. Ehrlich 1996. Human appropriation of renewable fresh water.Science 271:785–788.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. L., J. Matsumoto, andD. A. Brock. 2002. Methods for determining minimum freshwater inflow needs of Texas bays and estuaries.Estuaries 25:1262–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, C. M., M. C. Freeman, andB. J. Freeman. 2000. Regional effects of hydrologic alterations on riverine macrobiota in the New World: Tropical-temperature comparisons.BioScience 50:807–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Texas Department of Water Resources. 1982. The influence of freshwater inflows upon the major bays and estuaries of the Texas Gulf coast. Report LP-115. Texas Department of Water Resources, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vörosmarty, C. J. andD. Sahagian. 2000. Anthropogenic disturbance of the terrestrial water cycle.BioScience 50:753–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul A. Montagna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montagna, P.A., Alber, M., Doering, P. et al. Freshwater inflow: Science, policy, management. Estuaries 25, 1243–1245 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692221

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692221

Keywords