Skip to main content
Log in

Phylogeography and conservation genetics of the hellbender salamander (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated hellbender phylogeography through phylogenetic analyses of individuals sampled from 16 locations throughout their range in the eastern United States. Analyses were conducted on concatenated cytochrome-oxidase I (COI), cytochrome-b (Cytb) and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4 (ND4) mtDNA sequence, totaling 2160 nucleotides. Hellbender haplotypes differed by 0.1 to 5.8% maximum likelihood (ML) corrected sequence divergence. Phylogenetic analyses reveal that hellbenders are separated into 8 reciprocally monophyletic populations or clades differentiated by a minimum of 0.7 to 5.4% sequence divergence, each of which constitutes a separate Management Unit (MU). High among population divergence and reciprocal monophyly suggest that female-mediated gene flow is severely restricted or non-existent among each MU. Hellbenders are currently divided into two subspecies, Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis and C. a. bishopi based on morphological characters. The phylogenetic analyses presented here strongly indicate that these subspecies are paraphyletic. Management priorities for the hellbender should be reconsidered in light of these new molecular data. Results from Bayesian rooting indicate the root of the hellbender mtDNA tree lies on the branch leading to hellbender haplotypes from the Current, Eleven Point and New Rivers. The rooted tree suggests that a common ancestor in the southern Ozarks and/or southern Appalachians gave rise to northern hellbender populations, consistent with a Pleistocene refuge hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashley MV, Willson MF, Pergams ORW, O’Dowd DJ, Gende SM (2003) Evolutionarily enlightened management. Biol Conserv 111:115–123. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00279-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avise JC (1995) Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism and a connection between genetics and demography of relevance to conservation. Conserv Biol 9:686–690. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09030686.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avise JC (2000) Phylogeography. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Baric S, Sturmbauer C (1999) Ecological parallelism and cryptic species in the genus Ophiothrix derived from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Phylo Evo 11:157–162. doi:10.1006/mpev.1998.0551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berendzen PB, Simons AM, Wood RM (2003) Phylogeography of the northern hogsucker, Hypentelium nigricans (Teleostei: Cypriniformes): genetic evidence for the existence of the ancient Teays River. J Biogeogr 30:1139–1152. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00888.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein AR, Kiesecker JM (2002) Complexity in conservation: lessons from the global decline of amphibian populations. Ecol Lett 5:597–608. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00352.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (2004) Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzner JW, Crandall KA (2003) Linear habitats an the nested clade analysis: an empirical evaluation of geographic versus river distances using an Ozark crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae). Evolution Int J Org Evolution 57:2101–2118

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek RC (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3:294–299

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Funk DJ, Omland KE (2003) Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal Mitochondrial DNA. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 43:397–423. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma DJ (1997) Evolutionary biology. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao K, Shubin NH (2003) Earliest known crown-group salamanders. Nature 422:424–428. doi:10.1038/nature01491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gharrett AJ, Smoker WW, Reisenbichler RR, Taylor SG (1999) Outbreeding depression in hybrids between odd- and even-brookyear pink salmon. Aquaculture 173:117–129. doi:10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00480-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grobman AB (1943) Notes on salamanders with the description of a new species of Cryptobranchus. Occasional Papers of the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology 470:1–13. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/56909

  • Hardy ME, Grady JM, Routman EJ (2002) Intraspecific phylogeography of the slender madtom: the complex evolutionary history of the Central Highlands of the United States. Mol Ecol 11:2393–2403. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01616.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartl DL, Clark AG (1997) Principles of population genetics. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick P (2001) Conservation genetics: where are we? Trends Ecol Evol 16:629–636. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02282-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754–755. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huelsenbeck JP, Bollback JP, Levine AM (2002) Inferring the root of a phylogenetic tree. Syst Biol 51:32–43. doi:10.1080/106351502753475862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kozak KH, Blaine RA, Larson A (2006) Gene lineages and eastern North American palaeodrainage basins: phylogeography and speciation in salamanders of the Eurycea bislineata species complex. Mol Ecol 15:191–207. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02757.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy RC (1987) Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: interacting effects of drift, mutation, selection, and population subdivision. Cons Bio 2:143–158. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1987.tb00023.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenormand T (2002) Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends Ecol Evol 17:183–189. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02497-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matoli SR, Templeton AR (1999) Coadapted gene complexes for morphological traits in Drosophila mercatorum. Two-loci interactions. Heredity 83:54–61. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6885320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor BG (1981) Cryptobranchid salamanders from the Paleocene and Miocene of Saskatchewan. Copeia 76–86. doi:10.2307/1444042

  • Nickerson MA, Mays CE (1973) A study of the Ozark hellbender, Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi. Ecology 54:1163–1165. doi:10.2307/1935586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson MA, Krysko KL, Owen RD (2002) Ecological status of the hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis) and the mudpuppy (Necturus maculosus) salamanders in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. J N C Acad Sci 118:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson CL (1987) Movement and catchability of the hellbender, Cryptobranchus alleganiensis. J Herpetol 21:197–204. doi:10.2307/1564483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielou EC (1991) After the ice age—the return of life to glaciated North America. The University of Chicago Press, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ray LL (1974) Geomorphology and quaternary geology of the glaciated Ohio River Valley—a reconnaissance study. U.S. Geol Surv Prof Publ 826:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Redenbach Z, Taylor EB (2002) Evidence for historical introgression along a contact zone between two species of Char (Pisces: Salmonidae) in Northwestern North America. Evolution Int J Org Evolution 56:1021–1035

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Routman EJ (1993) Mitochondrial DNA variation in Cryptobranchus alleganiensis, a salamander with extremely low allozyme diversity. Copeia 1993:375–384. doi:10.2307/1447139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Routman EJ, Wu R, Templeton AR (1994) Parsimony, molecular evolution, and biogeography: the case of the North American giant salamander. Evolution Int J Org Evolution 48:1799–1809. doi:10.2307/2410509

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer HB, Pauly GB, Oliver JC, Trenham PC (2004) The molecular phylogenetics of endangerment: cryptic variation and historical phylogeography of the California tiger salamander, Ambystoma califoniense. Mol Ecol 13:3033–3049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins RC, Cohen NW (1995) A natural history of amphibians. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele CA, Carstens BC, Storfer A, Sullivan J (2005) Testing hypothesis of speciation timing in Dicamptodon copei and Dicamptodon aterrimus (Caudata: Dicamptodontidae). Mol Phylo Evo 36:90–100. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2004.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan J, Abdo Z, Joyce P, Swofford DL (2005) Comparing successive approximations and simultaneous optimization approaches to maximum likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol 22:1386–1392. doi:10.1093/molbev/msi129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (2001) PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b8. Sinauer, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallmon DA, Luikart G, Waples RS (2004) The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. Trends Ecol Evol 19:489–496. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton AR (1987) Coadaptation and outbreeding depression. In: Soule ME (ed) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts, pp 105–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Waples RS (1995) Evolutionary significant units and the conservation of biological diversity under the endangered species act. Am Fish Soc Symp 17:8–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler BA, Prosen E, Mathis A, Wilkinson RF (2003) Population declines of a long-lived salamander: a 20+ year study of hellbenders, Cryptobranchus alleganiensis. Biol Conserv 109:151–156. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00136-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson CC, Bernatchez L (1998) The ghost of hybrids past: fixation of arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) mitochondrial DNA in an introgressed population of lake trout (S. namaycush). Mol Ecol 7:127–132. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00302.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1968) Evolution and the genetic of populations. University of Chicago Press, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Zink RM, Blackwell-Rago RC, Ronquist F (2000) The shifting roles of dispersal and vicariance in biogeography. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:497–503. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Tammy Lim, Craig Reading, Greg Spicer, Daniel Moen, Saad Arif, and Frank Cipriano for reading previous versions of the manuscript. Sequencing was done in the Conservation Genetics Laboratory at San Francisco State University. We thank Jeff Briggler from the Missouri Department of Conservation, who kindly provided specimens from the Eleven Point River.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric J. Routman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sabatino, S.J., Routman, E.J. Phylogeography and conservation genetics of the hellbender salamander (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis). Conserv Genet 10, 1235 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-008-9655-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-008-9655-5

Keywords