Skip to main content
Log in

Amphiboles of the Khibiny alkaline pluton, Kola Peninsula, Russia

  • Minerals and Parageneses of Minerals
  • Published:
Geology of Ore Deposits Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rocks of the Khibiny pluton contain 25 amphibole varieties, including edenite, fluoredenite, kaersutite, pargasite, ferropargasite, hastingsite, magnesiohastingsite, katophorite, ferrikatophorite, magnesiokatophorite, magnesioferrikatophorite, magnesioferrifluorkatophorite, ferrimagnesiotaramite, ferrorichterite, potassium ferrorichterite, richterite, potassium richterite, potassium fluorrichterite, arfvedsonite, potassium arfvedsonite, magnesioarfvedsonite, magnesioriebeckite, ferriferronyboite, ferrinyboite, and ferroeckermannite. The composition of rock-forming amphiboles changes symmetrically relative to the Central Ring of the pluton; i.e., amphiboles enriched in K, Ca, Mg, and Si are typical of foyaite near and within the Central Ring. The Fe and Mn contents in amphiboles increase in the direction from marginal part of the pluton to its center. Foyaite of the marginal zone contains ferroeckermannite, richterite, arfvedsonite, and ferrorichterite; edenite is typical of foyaite and hornfels of the Minor Arc. Between the Minor Arc and the Central Ring, foyaite contains ferroeckermannite, arfvedsonite, and richterite; amphiboles in rischorrite, foidolite and hornfels of the Central Ring are (potassium) arfvedsonite, (potassium) richterite, magnesiokatophorite, magnesioarfvedsonite, ferroeckermannite, and ferriferronyboite; amphiboles in foyaite within the Central Ring, in the central part of the pluton, are arfvedsonite, magnesioarfvedsonite, ferriferronyboite, katophorite, and richterite. It is suggested that such zoning formed due to the alteration of foyaite by a foidolite melt intruded into the Main (Central) Ring Fault.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. A. Arzamastsev and L. V. Arzamastseva, “Evolution of Foidolite Series in Alkaline Plutons of the Kola Province: Mineralogical and Geochemical Attributes,” Petrologiya 1(5), 524–535 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. A. Arzamastsev, V. A. Kaverina, and L. I. Polezhaeva, Dike Rocks in the Khibiny Pluton and Its Surrounding (Kola Sci. Center, Acad. Sci. USSR, Apatity, 1988) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Bonstedt, I. Borneman-Starynkevich, N. Vlodavets, et al., Minerals in the Khibiny and Lovozero Tundras (Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1937) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. E. Borutsky, Rock-Forming Minerals of the High-Alkaline Complexes (Nauka, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Caldarelli, C. Castellano, and A. Vespignani, “Fractal and Topological Properties of Directed Fractures,” Phys. Rev. E. 49(4), 2673–2679 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. O. B. Dudkin, “Alkali Magnesium Amphibole from the Khibiny Tundras,” in Contribution to Mineralogy of the Kola Peninsula (Kola Sci. Center, Acad. Sci. USSR, Apatity, 1962), pp. 107–110 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. V. Galakhov, Petrology of the Khibiny Alkaline Pluton (Nauka, Leningrad, 1975) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. M. Goryainov and G. Yu. Ivanyuk, Self-Organization of Mineral Systems (Geos, Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. M. Goryainov, G. Yu. Ivanyuk, N. G. Konopleva, et al., “Structural and Compositional Organization of the Khibiny Pluton,” in Petrology and Ore Resource Potential of CIS REgions and the Baltic Shield (Kola Sci. Center, Russian Acad. Sci., Apatity, 2005), Vol. 3, pp. 89–91 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Yu. Ivanyuk, Ya. A. Pakhomovsky, A. V. Bazai, et al., “Calcium Amphiboles from Banded Iron Ore Formation of the Kola Peninsula,” Zap. Ross. Mineral. O-va 134(4), 56–70 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. P. Khomyakov, Mineralogy of Ultraperalkaline Rocks (Nauka, Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. G. Konopleva, G. Yu. Ivanyuk, Ya. A. Pakhomovsky, et al., “Mineral Zoning of Foyaites in the Khibiny Pluton along the Line from the Khibiny Station to Mount Rypnetsk,” in Proceedings of II Fersman Scientific Session of Kola Division of Russian Mineralogical Society Dedicated to 140 Jubilee of V. Ramsay (K&M, Apatity, 2005), pp. 116–119.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. E. Kostyleva-Labuntsova, B. E. Borutsky, M. N. Sokolova, et al., Mineralogy of the Khibiny Massif (Nauka, Moscow, 1978), Vol. 2, pp. 83–166 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. U. Kramm and L. N. Kogarko, “Nd and Sr Isotope Signatures of the Khibina and Lovozero Agpaitic Centres, Kola Alkaline Province, Russia,” Lithos 32, 225–242(1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. B. M. Kupletsky, “Petrography of the Khibiny Tundras. Rocks of the Eastern Umptek,” Tr. Mineral. Muzeya Akad. Nauk SSSR 1, 83–166 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. H. Mitchell and A. R. Chakhmouradian, “Th-Rich Loparite from the Khibiny Alkaline Complex, Kola Peninsula: Isomorphism and Paragenesis,” Mineral. Mag. 62, 341–355 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. I. V. Pekov and A. S. Podlesny, Mineralogy of the Kukisvumchor Deposit (Alkaline Pegmatites and Hydrothermalites) (Ass. Ekost. Mineral. Almanakh, 2004), No. 7.

  18. K. I. Polyakov, “Pyroxens and Amhiboles from Ijolite-Urtite of the Khibiny Massif,” in Contribution to Mineralogy of the Kola Peninsula (Nauka, Leningrad, 1969), No. 7, pp. 108–119 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. A. Sadovsky and V. F. Pisarenko, Seismic Processes in Block Medium (Nauka, Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. N. Shablinsky, “Deep Structure of the Khibiny and Lovozero Plutons,” Tr. Leningrad. O-va Estestvoispyt. 74, 41–43 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. C. Shumacher, “Appendix, 2. The Estimation of the Proportion of Ferric Iron in the Electron-Microprobe Analysis of Amphiboles,” in A Nomenclature of Minerals: A Compilation of IMA Reports (1998), pp. 238–246.

  22. V. N. Yakovenchuk, G. Yu. Ivanyuk, and Ya. A. Pakhomovsky, Khibiny. Laplandia Minerals, Ed. by F. Wall (Apatity, 2005).

  23. V. N. Yakovenchuk, G. Yu. Ivanyuk, Ya. A. Pakhomovsky, and Yu. P. Men’shikov, Minerals of the Khibiny Massif (Zemlya, Moscow, 1999) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. G. Konopleva.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © N.G. Konopleva, G.Yu. Ivanyuk, Ya.A. Pakhomovsky, V.N. Yakovenchuk, Yu.P. Men’shikov, Yu.A. Korchak, 2008, published in Zapiski Rossiiskogo Mineralogicheskogo Obshchestva, 2008, No. 1, pp. 37–53.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Konopleva, N.G., Ivanyuk, G.Y., Pakhomovsky, Y.A. et al. Amphiboles of the Khibiny alkaline pluton, Kola Peninsula, Russia. Geol. Ore Deposits 50, 720–731 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075701508080084

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075701508080084

Keywords