No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Unit cell refinement from powder diffraction data: the use of regression diagnostics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2018
Abstract
We discuss the use of regression diagnostics combined with nonlinear least-squares to refine cell parameters from powder diffraction data, presenting a method which minimizes residuals in the experimentally-determined quantity (usually 2θhkl or energy, Ehkl ). Regression diagnostics, particularly deletion diagnostics, are invaluable in detection of outliers and influential data which could be deleterious to the regressed results. The usual practice of simple inspection of calculated residuals alone often fails to detect the seriously deleterious outliers in a dataset, because bare residuals provide no information on the leverage (sensitivity) of the datum concerned. The regression diagnostics which predict the change expected in each cell constant upon deletion of each observation (hkl reflection) are particularly valuable in assessing the sensitivity of the calculated results to individual reflections. A new computer program, implementing nonlinear regression methods and providing the diagnostic output, is described.
Information
- Type
- Mineralogy
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1997
References
Belsley, D.A., Kuh, E. and Welsh, R.E. (1980) Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity.
John Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevington, P.R. (1969) Data Reduction and Error Analysis .fisr the Physical Sciences.
McGraw-Hill, New York, 336 pp.Google Scholar
Cohen, M.U. (1935) Precision lattice constants from X-ray powder photographs. Review of Scientific Instruments,
6, 68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, M., Cernik, R.J., Parrish, W. and Toraya, H. (1990) Lattice parameter determination for powders using synchrotron radiation. J. Appl. Crystallogr.,
23, 286-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsey, C.H. (1964) The calculation of errors in a least squares estimate of unit-cell dimensions. Mineral. Mag.,
33, 809-12.Google Scholar
Powell, R. (1985) Regression diagnostics and robust regression in geothermometer/geobarometer calibration: the garnet-clinopyroxene geothermometer revisited. J. Met. Geol.,
3, 231-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfern, S.A.T. and Salje, E. (1987) Thermodynamics of plagioclase II: Temperature evolution of the spontaneous strain at the I 
-P phase transition in anorthite. Phys. Chem. Minerals,
14, 189-95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-P phase transition in anorthite. Phys. Chem. Minerals,
14, 189-95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarRedfern, S.A.T., Graeme-Barber, A. and Salje, E. (1988) Thermodynamics of plagioclase III: Spontaneous strain at the I -P phase transition in Ca-rich plagioclase. Phys. Chem. Minerals,
16, 157-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-P phase transition in Ca-rich plagioclase. Phys. Chem. Minerals,
16, 157-63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarRoots, M. (1994) Molar volumes on the clinochloreamesite binary: some new data. Euro. J. Mineral., 6, 279-83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D.K. (1989) Computer analysis of diffraction data. In Modern Powder Diffraction (Bish, D.L. and Post, J.E., eds) Mineralogical Society of America. Reviews in Mineralogy,
20, 183–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toraya, H. (1993) The determination of unit-cell parameters from Bragg reflection data using a standard reference materials but without a calibration curve. J. Appl. Crystallogr.,
26, 583-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A.J.C. (1967) Statistical variance of line-profile parameters. Measures of intensity, location and dispersion. Acta Crystallogr.,
23, 888-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1158
- Cited by
