Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Izno (talk | contribs) at 21:42, 1 June 2026 (Changes to the functionaries team, June 2026 (2): new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.

Announcement archives:
  • 0 (2008-12 – 2009-01)
  • 1 (to 2009-02)
  • 2 (to 2009-05)
  • 3 (to 2009-06)
  • 4 (to 2009-07)
  • 5 (to 2009-12)
  • 6 (to 2010-12)
  • 7 (to 2011-12)
  • 8 (to 2012-12)
  • 9 (to 2013-12)
  • 10 (to 2015-12)
  • 11 (to 2018-04)
  • 12 (to 2020-08)
  • 13 (to 2023-03)
  • 14 (to 2025-11)
  • 15 (to present)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Maghreb closed

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

  1. When making edits relating to the Maghreb region, broadly construed, Bananakingler (talk · contribs), M.Bitton (talk · contribs), R3YBOl (talk · contribs), and Skitash (talk · contribs) must follow the editing expectations that would apply to a designated contentious topic. Violation of this remedy may be enforced in the same manner as a contentious topic, including through the standard set of user restrictions. Bananakingler, M.Bitton, and Skitash may appeal this remedy after six months, and every six months thereafter. R3YBOl may appeal this remedy at any time, and every six months thereafter.
  2. For the purposes of content dispute resolution and edit warring, M.Bitton (talk · contribs), R3YBOl (talk · contribs), and Skitash (talk · contribs) are considered a single user. The three-revert rule applies to reverts by all three editors and, where they participate in discussions together, they are required to disclose this restriction and their arguments should be treated as though they were advanced by a single user.
  3. With the standard exceptions, Bananakingler (talk · contribs) is restricted to one revert per 24 hours on any page within the Maghreb topic area, broadly construed. This remedy may be appealed after six months, and every six months thereafter.
  4. M.Bitton (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic banned from the Maghreb region, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed after six months, and every six months thereafter.
  5. M.Bitton (talk · contribs) is indefinitely banned from the English Wikipedia. This restriction may be appealed after twelve months, and every twelve months thereafter.
  6. Skitash (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic banned from the Maghreb region, broadly construed. This remedy may be appealed after six months, and every six months thereafter.
  7. The rollback permissions of Skitash (talk · contribs) are revoked. Skitash may request restoration of the permission six months after the implementation of this remedy at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback.
  8. R3YBOl (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic banned from the Maghreb region, broadly construed. This remedy may be appealed immediately, and every six months thereafter.

For the Arbitration Committee, Sennecaster (Chat) 01:54, 28 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 53 § Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Maghreb closed

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SchroCat closed

Arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SchroCat has been closed and the final decision is now viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

  • Example (talk · contribs) is indefinitely banned from the English Wikipedia. This restriction may be appealed after six months, and every six months thereafter.
  • Example (talk · contribs) is placed on probation. Violations of behavioral expectations may be enforced in the same manner as a contentious topic, including through the standard set of user restrictions, and misconduct may be reported at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard or directly to the Committee at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. This probation may be appealed in six months, and every six months thereafter.
  • Reports at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard about SchroCat are automatically subject to the "AE participation restriction". If there are particular editors whose input would be useful on a given thread, uninvolved administrators are encouraged to use their authority to invite them to comment.
  • SchroCat is banned from the English Wikipedia for three months.
  • SchroCat and Dronebogus are prohibited from interacting with, or commenting on, contributions made by each other, subject to the normal exceptions. This restriction may be appealed six months after the enactment of this remedy, and every six months thereafter.
  • Example (talk · contribs) is warned to abide by the civility policy.
  • Fortuna imperatrix mundi is indefinitely banned from user-conduct enforcement noticeboards. FIM is further banned from involving himself in any disputes between other editors, including actions such as warning an editor for their actions in such a dispute, except for obvious vandalism. This restriction may be appealed six months after the enactment of this remedy, and every six months thereafter.
  • Fortuna imperatrix mundi, Example (talk · contribs), and Example (talk · contribs) are topic banned from article disputes or user disputes involving SchroCat, and vice versa. These restrictions may be appealed by either party six months after the enactment of this remedy, and every six months thereafter.

For the Arbitration Committee, DatGuyTalkContribs 13:51, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 53 § Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SchroCat closed

Contentious topic procedure: awareness, warnings, renewal, and banners

There are four proposals which amend various parts of the contentious topics procedure: simplifying awareness by replacing it with warnings, cautioning against repeated warnings, eliminating page restriction renewal, and reducing banner blindness. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions § Contentious topic changes. For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 19:54, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Contentious topic procedure: awareness, warnings, renewal, and banners

Changes to the functionaries team, June 2026

At their request, the oversight permission of L235 (talk · contribs) is removed. The committee sincerely thanks L235 for their service as an oversighter.

For the Arbitration Committee, Izno (talk) 02:16, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Changes to the functionaries team, June 2026

Changes to the functionaries team, June 2026 (2)

Following a request to the Committee, the checkuser and oversight permissions of Giraffer (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) have been restored.

For the Arbitration Committee, Izno (talk) 21:42, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply