People who are influenced by TV.

I'm translating into English, so I think the nuances will change. So the English version is free.

※So the text starts from here↓

Hello everyone.

Sai&Co. WAKU Chare LAB's Sai&Co. It is.

Well, today I'm going to talk about "people who are influenced by TV".

But before that, please.

Today's story, if "That's good!" If so, please share it with your friends.

If you do that, I think there will be one person who can be saved.

So it's the main topic.

Well, everyone.

How about everyone?

Are you under the influence of TV?

Or rather, you don't believe it as it is, do you?

Or rather, aren't there some people who don't even realize that?

If you don't notice this, "It's quite dangerous!" That's the story, today's story.

First of all, please understand that I'm not fighting on TV.

I used to watch it absurdly, so I was rather a TV kid.

That's why I took care of you.

Moreover, I'm sorry if there are people involved among the readers.

It's just nonsense, so what I'm going to talk about from now on.

It's just okay, I was a little curious, so I'll post it on my blog this time.

That is, there are people around me, but there are people who convey TV reports as they are.

For example, the other day, what about a certain stalker incident?

"Stalling is dangerous, so you have to be careful!" You're going to say that, right?

Well, it's normal as a conversation, if it's just a small talk.

But in fact, when you really have to be careful, "What should I do?" Can't it be?

According to reports, in most cases, "I consulted the police in advance." That's what you say, right?

But if the incident doesn't happen, the police can't move.

Then "Don't I have to take a step out of the house?" I thought, "Should I keep goods that can defend myself close to me?" Or, "Do you want to hire a bodyguard?" There is, but it's not very realistic, is it?

Well, give up a hundred steps, wearing self-defense goods is probably the easiest way to do it, but it's difficult to carry it with you all the time, isn't it?

You may forget it, and if you always put it in your bag, it will be full, right?

That's why I'm going to leave it today.

Moreover, if you get attacked right away, you won't be able to use it in the end... right?

So, well, if you think about the possibility that you can't use it, it comes out quite a lot.

This sounds like a fart, but in fact, there is a possibility, right?

So "What should I do?" It comes to the conclusion.

"It's impossible to prevent it perfectly." It's a story, but well, I'd like to continue talking about this and that because it's practical, but it's a little off from today's main topic, so let's put it aside for a while, today it was about "the impact of TV".

The point is that if you accept the TV information as it is, the range of information will be narrowed.

No matter how much you say it on TV, if you take it seriously, this will be terrible.

Because TV often broadcasts comments on apology, doesn't it?

Oh, it's true that you were wrong, right?

That's right.

That's why, "TV is also wrong!" I want you to know that.

Everything, "That's the truth and the right answer!" What are you reporting?

It's basic.

Well, if you don't do that, even if you report it in a humsy way, everyone won't see it, and the complaints will be terrible, so it can't be helped.

But sometimes it doesn't end if you can't help it, right?

I made a VTR and played it without actually interviewing, and I used cherry blossoms for people who interviewed me.

There are also false reports, right?

Because those who take it seriously will move the truth in the wrong direction.

Some people have said about the previous Pacific War.

The start of that war was partly a big part of the media.

After all, major media have a strong influence.

Even if it was the media at that time, there should have been much less than it is now.

It's like a major media monopolizing one company, isn't it?

After all, the media will report it all over the country.

Moreover, if you try to catch information that you can't get with your own eyes and ears, you have to rely on them too much, right?

I can't go there by myself.

That's why you can become a street-sided information source.

But if you think about this carefully, it's dangerous, right?

Because it means that only one thing believes what it says.

It's like tracing your thoughts as they are.

For example, believing only what your parents say or believing only what your school teacher says is the same as saying that, right?

But even school teachers have a lot of things they don't know, and even your parents are not perfect, right?

Sometimes it's obvious that you're wrong, right?

That's why it's quite dangerous to take one thing and what a person says.

Otherwise, you won't notice the mistake.

So first of all, listen to more than one person and judge yourself.

This will be important.

If that happens, even if it's a small talk, the way you say it will be different, right?

There are people who say the TV report exactly, and there are people who don't.

For example, people who say TV reports exactly tell what they hear, right?

"It seems that there was a fire in 〇〇. It's because of ××! You have to be careful. That.

However, people who don't just believe the report at face value and just stop it with one source of information don't immediately tell the fact, but take a breath.

For example, "It seems that there was a fire in 〇〇, is it true? Is there any other reason? I have to be careful, but what should I pay attention to first? And so on.

You don't trace what the TV is saying and don't say it.

That's why such people naturally deepen their thinking, but the point is not shallow.

As with what the TV says, the information source does not fit into one.

Even if you don't doubt what TV says, "But what else are you saying?" I'm curious.

So "Let's look into other things!" That's What You Think.

After all, people interpret what they see and hear with their own subjective opinion, right?

And for the better.

Make it convenient for you.

That's why it's better to listen to most information thinking that there is a lot of bias.

A certain newspaper is like that, isn't it?

It seems to be quite biased.

It seems that there is a report that reflects the intentions of the upper management.

Don't you say that anymore?

Because it's a one-time employee, do you disobey the instructions of the upper management?

90% of people say, "It's impossible." You will answer that.

Because I don't want to be noticed.

You want to spend a peaceful time, right?

Usually.

That's why it's better to think that what TV says is quite biased, so you don't have to lose money later.

Of course, I also regret it.

Well, how was it?

Today's story.

I'll say it one last time, but this is not just a media criticism.

"Don't take the information spread by the media at face value!" Because it's a story.

There are also good points of major media.

But not only one source of information, but also from many aspects, and "Let's decide for ourselves in the end, let's think about it and believe it." That's the story, so don't make a mistake.

So, when it comes to me every day, I find time like this every day, find various events in the world, think in my own way, and chew the results in an easy-to-understand way using psychology, brain science, personality analysis, etc. I'm doing it.

So if you are interested in today's blog, please take a look at these other blogs.

All of them can be read in about 5 minutes.

Questions, comments, and consultations are accepted from the official LINE↓

We will also post stories that we couldn't finish writing there, so we look forward to your registration.

Finally, if you like today's story, please introduce it to your friends.

See you then✌️