- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Epistemic Normativity, Argumentation, and Fallacies
Argumentation 11 (3):277-292 (1997)
Abstract
In Biro and Siegel we argued that a theory of argumentation mustfully engage the normativity of judgments about arguments, and we developedsuch a theory. In this paper we further develop and defend our theory.Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Hypothetical and Categorical Epistemic Normativity.Chase B. Wrenn - 2004 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):273-290.
Epistemic Normativity.Stephen Grimm - 2009 - In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & Duncan Pritchard, Epistemic value. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 243-264.
Epistemic Side Constraints and the Structure of Epistemic Normativity.Zachary Silver - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (1):129-153.
Critique of an epistemic account of fallacies.Jonathan E. Adler - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (3):263-272.
Infinitism and Agents Like Us: Reply to Turri.Joshua A. Smith & Adam C. Podlaskowski - 2013 - Logos and Episteme (1):125-128.
On the Theoretical Unification and Nature of Fallacies.Polycarp Ikuenobe - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (2):189-211.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-11
Downloads
267 (#161,916)
6 months
41 (#166,500)
2010-09-11
Downloads
267 (#161,916)
6 months
41 (#166,500)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation.Frank Zenker, Jan Albert van Laar, B. Cepollaro, A. GÃĒÅĢÄ, M. Hinton, C. G. King, B. Larson, M. LewiÅski, C. Lumer, S. Oswald, M. Pichlak, B. D. Scott, M. UrbaÅski & J. H. M. Wagemans - 2024 - Argumentation 38 (1):7-40.
References found in this work
S.Marcus Willaschek, JÞrgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin - 2015 - In Marcus Willaschek, JÞrgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin, Kant-Lexikon. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 1995-2243.
Praktische Argumentationstheorie. Theoretische Grundlagen, praktische BegrÞndung und Regeln wichtiger Argumentationsarten.Christoph Lumer - 1990 - Braunschweig, Germany: Vieweg.
The Socratic Elenchus.Gregory Vlastos - 1999 - In Gail Fine, Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
