Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Dec;4(4):165-72.
doi: 10.1007/s11904-007-0024-7.

Risk compensation in HIV prevention: implications for vaccines, microbicides, and other biomedical HIV prevention technologies

Affiliations
Review

Risk compensation in HIV prevention: implications for vaccines, microbicides, and other biomedical HIV prevention technologies

Lisa A Eaton et al. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Studies investigating the effects of biologic HIV prevention technologies have been reported with promising results for slowing the spread of the disease. Although they can reduce the rate of HIV transmission at varying levels of efficaciousness, it is vital to anticipate their impact on subsequent sexual behaviors. Risk homeostasis theory posits that decreases in perceived risk, which will occur with access to HIV prevention technologies, will correspond with increases in risk-taking behavior. Here we review the literature on risk compensation in response to HIV vaccines, topical microbicides, antiretroviral medications, and male circumcision. Behavioral risk compensation is evident in response to prevention technologies that are used in advance of HIV exposure and at minimal personal cost. We conclude that behavioral risk compensation should be addressed by implementing adjunct behavioral risk-reduction interventions to avoid negating the preventive benefits of biomedical HIV prevention technologies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. A model of risk compensation and sexual risk behaviors
Note: Adapted from Wilde’s [7] risk homeostasis model.

References

    1. Cassel MM, Halperin DT, Shelton JD, Stanton D. Risk compensation: the Achilled’ heel of innovations in HIV prevention? British Medical Journal. 2006;332:605–7. Highlights important considerations for implementing HIV prevention technologies. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wasserheit JN. Epidemiological synergy. Interrelationships between human immunodeficiency virus infection and other sexually transmitted diseases. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 1992;19:61–77. - PubMed
    1. Blower SM, Gershengorn HB, Grant RM. A tale of two futures: HIV and antiretroviral therapy in San Francisco. Science. 2000;287:650–4. - PubMed
    1. Lui AY, Grant RM, Buchbinder SP. Preexposure prophyaxis for HIV: Unproven promise and potential pitfalls. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2006;206:863–865. - PubMed
    1. Wilde GJS. Target Risk: Dealing with the danger of death, disease, and damage in everyday decisions. PDE Publications; Ontario, Canada: 1994.

Publication types