Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May 16:5:444.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00444. eCollection 2014.

Effortless inhibition: habit mediates the relation between self-control and unhealthy snack consumption

Affiliations

Effortless inhibition: habit mediates the relation between self-control and unhealthy snack consumption

Marieke A Adriaanse et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

In contrast to prevailing beliefs, recent research suggests that trait self-control promotes health behavior not because those high in self-control are more successful at resisting single temptations, but rather because they develop adaptive habits. The present paper presents a first empirical test of this novel suggestion by investigating the mediating role of habit in explaining the relation between self-control and unhealthy snacking behavior. Results showed that self-control was negatively associated with unhealthy snack consumption and unhealthy snacking habits. As hypothesized, the relation between self-control and unhealthy snack intake was mediated by habit strength. Self-control was not associated with fruit consumption or fruit consumption habits. These results provide the first evidence for the notion that high self-control may influence the formation of habits and in turn affect behavior. Moreover, results imply that self-control may be particularly influential in case of inhibiting unhealthy food intake rather than promoting healthy food intake.

Keywords: effortless; habit; health; inhibition; self-control; snacking.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aarts H., Dijksterhuis A. (2000). Habits as knowledge structures: automaticity in goal-directed behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78 53–63 10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.53 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adriaanse M. A., De Ridder D. T. D, De Wit J. B. F. (2009). Finding the critical cue: implementation intentions to change one’s diet work best when tailored to personally relevant reasons for unhealthy eating. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 35 60–71 10.1177/0146167208325612 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adriaanse M. A., Oettingen G., Gollwitzer P. M., Hennes E. P., De Ridder D. T. D, De Wit J. B. F. (2010). When planning is not enough: fighting unhealthy snacking habits by mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII). Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 40 1277–1293 10.1002/ejsp.730 - DOI
    1. Bargh J. A. (1994). “The four horsemen of automaticity: awareness, efficiency, intentions and control,” in Handbook of Social Cognition eds Wyer R., Srull T. (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum) 1–40
    1. Bargh J. A., Gollwitzer P. M. (1994). “Environmental control of goal-directed action: automatic and strategic contingencies between situations and behavior,” in Integrative Views of Motivation, Cognition, and Emotion. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Vol. 41 ed. Spaulding W. D. (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press) 71–124 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources