Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Jul;173(1):209-17.
doi: 10.1111/bjd.13424. Epub 2015 May 29.

Evaluation of the efficacy of cysteamine 5% cream in the treatment of epidermal melasma: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Evaluation of the efficacy of cysteamine 5% cream in the treatment of epidermal melasma: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

P Mansouri et al. Br J Dermatol. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Melasma is a difficult-to-treat hyperpigmentary disorder. While cysteamine is a known potent depigmenting agent, its efficacy in treating melasma has not been tested.

Objectives: To study the efficacy of cysteamine 5% cream in the treatment of patients with epidermal melasma.

Methods: In this double-blind randomized study, participating patients (n = 50) received either placebo (n = 25) or cysteamine cream (n = 25). Cysteamine cream or placebo were applied on the lesions once a day at bedtime over 4 months. The efficacy of treatments was determined through Mexameter skin colorimetry, Melasma Area Severity Index (MASI) score, Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) and patients' questionnaires, all performed at baseline and after 2 and 4 months of treatment.

Results: At baseline, the mean differences between pigmented and normal skin (calculated by Mexameter) were 75.2 ± 37 and 68.9 ± 31 in the cysteamine and placebo groups, respectively. After 2 and 4 months of application of cysteamine and placebo cream, the mean differences were 39.7 ± 16.6 and 26.2 ± 16 in the cysteamine group, and 63.8 ± 28.6 and 60.7 ± 27.3 in the placebo group, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between the group outcomes at both points (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001). At the end of the treatment, the MASI scores were significantly lower in the cysteamine group vs. placebo (7.2 ± 5.5 vs. 11.6 ± 7.9, P = 0.02). The IGA and patients' viewpoints indicated significant efficacy of cysteamine cream vs. placebo.

Conclusions: Cysteamine cream showed significant efficacy in the treatment of melasma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types