Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Mar;94(3):552-7.
doi: 10.3382/ps/peu011. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

Effects of housing system on the costs of commercial egg production

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effects of housing system on the costs of commercial egg production

W A Matthews et al. Poult Sci. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

This article reports the first publicly available egg production costs compared across 3 hen-housing systems. We collected detailed data from 2 flock cycles from a commercial egg farm operating a conventional barn, an aviary, and an enriched colony system at the same location. The farm employed the same operational and accounting procedures for each housing system. Results provide clear evidence that egg production costs are much higher for the aviary system than the other 2 housing systems. Feed costs per dozen eggs are somewhat higher for the aviary and lower for the enriched house compared with the conventional house. Labor costs are much lower for the conventional house than the other 2, and pullet costs are much higher for the aviary. Energy and miscellaneous costs are a minimal part of total operating costs and do not differ by housing system. Total capital investments per hen-capacity are much higher for the aviary and the enriched house. Capital costs per dozen eggs depend on assumptions about appropriate interest and depreciation rates. Using the same 10% rate for each housing system shows capital costs per dozen for the aviary and the enriched housing system are much higher than capital costs per dozen for the conventional house. The aviary has average operating costs (feed, labor, pullet, energy, and miscellaneous costs that recur for each flock and vary with egg production) about 23% higher and average total costs about 36% higher compared with the conventional house. The enriched housing system has average operating costs only about 4% higher compared with the conventional house, but average total costs are 13% higher than for the conventional house.

Keywords: egg-laying cost; hen housing system; sustainable egg production.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Average weekly feed costs per dozen eggs by housing system (both flocks).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Average every two weeks labor costs per dozen eggs produced by housing system.

References

    1. Cone T. Burger King Makes Cage-Free Eggs, Pork Promise. Associated Press News Service; 2012. April 26, 2012, Accessed http://infoweb.newsbank.com/iw-search/we/InfoWeb/?p_action=explore&d_sea.... Apr. 22, 2014.
    1. Lusk J. L., Norwood F. B. Animal welfare economics. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 2011;33:463–483.
    1. Mench J. A., Sumner D. A., Rosen-Molina J. T. Sustainability of egg production in the United States—The policy and market context. Poult. Sci. 2011;90:229–240. - PubMed
    1. Norwood F. B., Lusk J. L. Compassion, by the Pound: The Economics of Farm Animal Welfare. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2011.
    1. Patterson P., Koelkebeck K., Bell D., Carey J., Anderson K., Darre M. Egg marketing in national supermarkets: Specialty eggs. Part 2. Poult. Sci. 2001;80:390–395. - PubMed

Publication types