Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;4(19):3800-11.
doi: 10.1002/ece3.1187. Epub 2014 Sep 12.

Higher mobility of butterflies than moths connected to habitat suitability and body size in a release experiment

Affiliations

Higher mobility of butterflies than moths connected to habitat suitability and body size in a release experiment

Mikko Kuussaari et al. Ecol Evol. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Mobility is a key factor determining lepidopteran species responses to environmental change. However, direct multispecies comparisons of mobility are rare and empirical comparisons between butterflies and moths have not been previously conducted. Here, we compared mobility between butterflies and diurnal moths and studied species traits affecting butterfly mobility. We experimentally marked and released 2011 butterfly and 2367 moth individuals belonging to 32 and 28 species, respectively, in a 25 m × 25 m release area within an 11-ha, 8-year-old set-aside field. Distance moved and emigration rate from the release habitat were recorded by species. The release experiment produced directly comparable mobility data in 18 butterfly and 9 moth species with almost 500 individuals recaptured. Butterflies were found more mobile than geometroid moths in terms of both distance moved (mean 315 m vs. 63 m, respectively) and emigration rate (mean 54% vs. 17%, respectively). Release habitat suitability had a strong effect on emigration rate and distance moved, because butterflies tended to leave the set-aside, if it was not suitable for breeding. In addition, emigration rate and distance moved increased significantly with increasing body size. When phylogenetic relatedness among species was included in the analyses, the significant effect of body size disappeared, but habitat suitability remained significant for distance moved. The higher mobility of butterflies than geometroid moths can largely be explained by morphological differences, as butterflies are more robust fliers. The important role of release habitat suitability in butterfly mobility was expected, but seems not to have been empirically documented before. The observed positive correlation between butterfly size and mobility is in agreement with our previous findings on butterfly colonization speed in a long-term set-aside experiment and recent meta-analyses on butterfly mobility.

Keywords: Animal movement; dispersal propensity; experimental study on migration; habitat preference; interspecific differences in mobility; mark-release-recapture study; release habitat suitability; species traits; variation in dispersal ability; wingspan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Aerial photograph of the study area. Letter A indicates the release area within the focal set-aside field. The black line with arrows indicates the 2500-m-long transect in which marked individuals were systematically searched. Solid white lines show the searching routes outside the release set-aside, and dashed white lines show the routes which were walked less frequently. Numbers 1–4 indicate favorable butterfly and moth habitats, which were used both for collecting individuals for the releases and for searching recaptures of emigrated individuals; especially sites 1 (abandoned farmyard and a sheltered forest edge) and 2 (semi-natural grassland patch) attracted many emigrants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Differences in (A) mean distance moved, (B) emigration rate, and (C) recapture rate between butterflies and geometroid moths. Means are least squares means (LSM) with 95% confidence intervals based on the statistical models fitted to collected data (Table2). The asterisks indicate the statistical difference between the species groups (**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Statistically significant relationships between species traits and the three mobility variables: (A–B) distance moved, (C–D) emigration rate, and (E–F) recapture rate in butterflies. Means are least squares means (LSM) with 95% confidence intervals based on the multivariate models fitted to collected data (Table3). In the panels A, C, and E, the dots represent means for individual species. The letters a and b within the panels B, D, and F indicate homogeneous groups and thus the treatments which differed significantly in pairwise comparisons.

References

    1. Alanen E-L, Hyvönen T, Lindgren S, Härmä O. Kuussaari M. Differential responses of bumblebees and diurnal Lepidoptera to vegetation succession in long-term set-aside. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011;48:1251–1259.
    1. Baguette M, Blanchet S, Legrand D, Stevens VM. Turlure C. Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks. Biol. Rev. 2013;88:310–326. - PubMed
    1. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, et al. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009;24:127–135. - PubMed
    1. Bonte D, van Dyck H, Bullock JM, Coulon A, Delgado M, Gibbs M, et al. Costs of dispersal. Biol. Rev. 2012;87:290–312. - PubMed
    1. Bowler DE. Benton TG. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol. Rev. 2005;80:205–225. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources