Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;110(S2):S181-S185.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305645.

Aligning US Spending Priorities Using the Health Impact Pyramid Lens

Affiliations

Aligning US Spending Priorities Using the Health Impact Pyramid Lens

J Mac McCullough et al. Am J Public Health. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Thomas Frieden's "health impact pyramid" presents a hierarchy in which the wide base of the pyramid of socioeconomic factors at a population level has more impact on the health of the public than do individually focused interventions at the pyramid's top.From this pyramid perspective, the US spending priorities are misaligned, as expenses targeted at public health and socioeconomic factors are far outstripped by spending on individual health care services at the top of the pyramid. The nation's ongoing debate on health care reform continues to focus on access to individual health care services, despite evidence demonstrating the health impacts of population-level efforts at the base of the pyramid and the synergistic health impacts of health and social service collaboration.We examine the need for improved systems alignment through the lens of the health impact pyramid. We catalog the types of misalignments and their social, political, and systems genesis. We identify promising opportunities to realign US health spending toward the socioeconomic factor base of the health impact pyramid and emphasize the need to integrate and align public health, social services, and medical care in the United States.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Health Impact Pyramid Versus Actual State and Local Government Spending: United States, 2017 Note. Spending data are from 2017 US Census Bureau State & Local Finance Expenditures. Categories are defined by the Census Bureau, and further disaggregation—including public health as distinct from other nonhospital health spending—is not possible using these data. The spending pyramid does not include spending on administration ($141 billion), debt payments ($106 billion), non-K–12 education ($351 billion), other general expenditures ($143 billion), utilities ($231 billion), liquor store expenditures ($8 billion), or insurance trust expenditures ($349 billion).
FIGURE 2—
FIGURE 2—
Frieden Health Impact Pyramid Modified to Highlight Reasons for Misalignment of Policy Priorities With Impact

References

    1. Frieden TR. A framework for public health action: the health impact pyramid. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(4):590–595. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bradley EH, Elkins BR, Herrin J, Elbel B. Health and social services expenditures: associations with health outcomes. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(10):826–831. - PubMed
    1. McCullough JM, Leider JP. Government spending in health and nonhealth sectors associated with improvement in county health rankings. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016;35(11):2037–2043. - PubMed
    1. Tran LD, Zimmerman FJ, Fielding JE. Public health and the economy could be served by reallocating medical expenditures to social programs. SSM Popul Health. 2017;3:185–191. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hartman M, Martin AB, Benson J, Catlin A. National health care spending in 2018: growth driven by accelerations in Medicare and private insurance spending. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020;39(1):8–17. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources