Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 21:9:e12242.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.12242. eCollection 2021.

A new vertebrate fauna from the Lower Cretaceous Holly Creek Formation of the Trinity Group, southwest Arkansas, USA

Affiliations

A new vertebrate fauna from the Lower Cretaceous Holly Creek Formation of the Trinity Group, southwest Arkansas, USA

Celina A Suarez et al. PeerJ. .

Abstract

We present a previously discovered but undescribed late Early Cretaceous vertebrate fauna from the Holly Creek Formation of the Trinity Group in Arkansas. The site from the ancient Gulf Coast is dominated by semi-aquatic forms and preserves a diverse aquatic, semi-aquatic, and terrestrial fauna. Fishes include fresh- to brackish-water chondrichthyans and a variety of actinopterygians, including semionotids, an amiid, and a new pycnodontiform, Anomoeodus caddoi sp. nov. Semi-aquatic taxa include lissamphibians, the solemydid turtle Naomichelys, a trionychid turtle, and coelognathosuchian crocodyliforms. Among terrestrial forms are several members of Dinosauria and one or more squamates, one of which, Sciroseps pawhuskai gen. et sp. nov., is described herein. Among Dinosauria, both large and small theropods (Acrocanthosaurus, Deinonychus, and Richardoestesia) and titanosauriform sauropods are represented; herein we also report the first occurrence of a nodosaurid ankylosaur from the Trinity Group. The fauna of the Holly Creek Formation is similar to other, widely scattered late Early Cretaceous assemblages across North America and suggests the presence of a low-diversity, broadly distributed continental ecosystem of the Early Cretaceous following the Late Jurassic faunal turnover. This low-diversity ecosystem contrasts sharply with the highly diverse ecosystem which emerged by the Cenomanian. The contrast underpins the importance of vicariance as an evolutionary driver brought on by Sevier tectonics and climatic changes, such as rising sea level and formation of the Western Interior Seaway, impacting the early Late Cretaceous ecosystem.

Keywords: Chondrichthyes; Crocodile; Dinsaur; Early Cretaceous; Holly Creek Formation; Lissamphibian; Paleobiogeography; Pycnodont fish; Trinity Group; Turtles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Location and stratigraphic position of Holly Creek Fauna.
(A) Outcrop belt of the Cretaceous system relative to the Cenozoic and Paleozoic erathems in the Gulf Coast region; Howard County, Arkansas, in red. (B) Stratigraphic position of the Holly Creek Formation within the Arkansas Trinity Group, with its lateral equivalents of the Trinity Group in Texas and Oklahoma. Paleogeographic map modified from Platt et al. (2018). K-system = Cretaceous System.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Chondrichthyes and Actinopterygii.
(A–B) UA-2016-13-158, Lonchidion anitae, tooth in occlusal (A) and lingual (B) views. (C–D) UA-2016-13-157, indet. shark tooth in lingual (C) and lateral (D) views. (E–F) UA-2016-13-267 and UA-2016-13-269, Actinopterygii indet tooth (E) and jaw (F). (G–J) UA-2016-13-257a-c, unidentified ganoid scales. (K–L) UA-2016-13-263, cf. Lepidotes sp., teeth in lateral (K) and occlusal (L) views. (M) UA-2016-13-256, unidentified amiid tooth. (N–O) UA-2016-13-239, unidentified basibranchial teeth. (P) UA-2016-13-251, unidentified fish spine. Scale bars = one mm.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Pycnodontiformes fish teeth.
(A–C) Anomoeodus caddoi sp. nov. (A) isolated tooth (UA-2016-13-291); (B) right prearticular plate (UA-2016-13-232, holotype); (C) left prearticular plate (UA-2016-13-220). (D-E) Pycnodontiformes, indet. (D) unidentified pharyngeal tooth (UA-2016-13-226); (E) isolated oral tooth (UA-2016-13-245). Scale bars = 200 μm.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Lissamphibia and Squamata elements.
(A–C) Isolated elements of Anura, indet. (A–B) UA-2016-13-145, partial left maxilla in labial (A) and lingual (B) arrow indicates possible pterygoid process. (C) Fused tibia-fibula (UA-2016-13-155). (D) UA-2016-13-295, Squamata indet., vertebra in dorsal view. Scale bars = one mm.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Sciroseps pawhuskai, gen et sp. nov. (Scincomorpha: Paramacellodidae).
UA-2016-13-294, holotype, left mandible in lingual (A), dorsal (B), and buccal (C) views. (D–F) line drawing of the holotype, highlighting specific skull elements in lingual (D), dorsal (E), and buccal (F) views.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Naomichelys speciosa carapace elements.
(A) First neural bone (UA-2016-13-9) in dorsal (left) and ventral views; note bifurcating ridge down the center of the bone (arrow) in ventral view (right). (B) Nuchal fragment (UA-2016-13-12) in dorsal (left) and ventral (right) views. (C) Unusually shaped marginal fragment (UA-2016-13-7). (D) Thick costal fragment (UA-2016-13-4). (E) Unusual costal or marginal fragment (UA-2016-12-1) in ventral (top), transverse (middle; note L-shaped cross section) and dorsal (bottom) views. Scale bars = one cm.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Naomichelys speciosa plastron fragments.
(A) Right xiphiplastron (UA-2016-13-3) in ventral (left) and dorsal (right) views. (B) An unknown fragment (UA-2016-13-2) in ventral (left) and dorsal (right) views. Scale bars = five cm.
Figure 8
Figure 8. Trionychidae costal fragment.
UA-2016-13-80 in (A) ventral and (B) dorsal views. Scale bar = one cm.
Figure 9
Figure 9. Crocodyliformes vertebrae.
(A) A possible sacral vertebra (UA-2016-13-29) in (top row, left to right) anterior, dorsal, right lateral views; and (second row, left to right) in left lateral, dorsal, and posterior views. (B) Cervical vertebra (UA-2016-13-41) in (top row, left to right) posterior, ventral, and left lateral view; and (second row, left to right) right lateral, ventral, and anterior views. (C) Cervical vertebra (UA-2016-13-31) in (top row, left to right) posterior, dorsal, and left lateral views; and (second row, left to right) in right lateral, ventral, and posterior views. (D) Dorsal vertebra (UA-2016-13-32) in (top row, left to right) anterior, dorsal, and right lateral views; and (second row, left to right) left lateral, ventral, and posterior views. (E) Dorsal vertebra (UA-2016-13-30) in (first row, left to right) posterior, ventral, and right lateral views; and (second row, left to right) left lateral, dorsal, and anterior views. (F) Ascending process of a neural arch preserving a left prezygapophysis (UA-2016-13-35) in (top row, left to right) left lateral and anterior views; and in (bottom row, left to right) posterior and medial views. (G) Ascending process of a neural arch preserving a portion of the diapophysis (UA-2016-13-36) in medial (left) and lateral (right) views. The pre-and post zygapophyses are not preserved. (H) Ascending process of a neural arch preserving the right prezygapophysis (UA-2016-13-37) in (left to right) right lateral and posterior views. Azo, prezygapophysis; dia, diapophysis; hyp, hypapophysis; para, parapophysis. Scale bars = one cm.
Figure 10
Figure 10. Crocodyliformes osteoderms.
(A–D) Dorsal osteoderms and (E–F) ventral osteoderm. (A) Dorsal osteoderm (UA-2016-19) in (top to bottom) dorsal, ventral, medial, and lateral views. (B) Fragment of a dorsal osteoderm (UA-2016-13-18) in (top to bottom) dorsal and ventral views. (C) Fragment of a dorsal osteoderm (UA-2016-13-27) in (top to bottom) dorsal, ventral, transverse, and (second column) medial views. (D) Dorsal osteoderm (UA-2016-13-24) in (top row, left to right) dorsal, lateral(bottom row, left to right) ventral, and medial views. A distinct groove or fossa is evident for insertion of the anterior spine (e.g., observed in A). (E) A ventral osteoderm (UA-2016-13-22) in ventral and dorsal views. (F) A central ventral osteoderm (UA-2016-13-23) in ventral and dorsal views. Scale bars = one cm.
Figure 11
Figure 11. Paluxysuchus (Crocodylia: Coelognathosuchia), cranial elements.
(A–E) Right quadrate (UA-2016-13-27) in posterior (A), dorsal (B), ventral (C), medial (D), and lateral (E) views. (F–G) Posterior lobe of the left quadratojugal (UA-2016-13-25) in dorsal (F), and ventral (G) views. (H–M), teeth (UA-2016-13-63). Scale bars = one cm.
Figure 12
Figure 12. Paluxysuchus (Crocodylia: Coelognathosuchia), right quadrate.
UA-2016-13-27 in posterior (A), dorsal (B), ventral (C), medial (D), and lateral (E) views. “Crest A” and “B” as described by Adams (2013) are observed, with “Crest B” being the most defined crest. int sulc = intercondylar sulcus. Scale bar = one cm.
Figure 13
Figure 13. Paluxysuchus (Crocodylia: Coelognathosuchia), posterior lobe of the left quadratojugal.
UA-2016-13-25 in (A) dorsal, and (B) ventral views. There is a distinct rugose medial margin for contact with the quadrate and a deep groove for contact with the jugal. The dorsal surface is ornamented with deep pits. Scale bar = one cm.
Figure 14
Figure 14. cf. Paluxysuchus (Crocodylia: Coelognathosuchia) skull.
(A) Dorsal and (B) ventral view of a coelognathosuchian skull (TMM 41,881) from the Briar Site, housed at TMM.
Figure 15
Figure 15. cf. Bernissartiidae tooth.
UA-2016-13-175 in (A) lateral and (B) occlusal views. Scale bar = one mm.
Figure 16
Figure 16. Sauropoda, various elements.
(A–D) Brachiosauridae, UA-2016-13-180, tooth in lingual (A), lateral 1 (B), buccal (C), and lateral 2 (D) views. Scale bar = one cm. (E–N), Sauropoda, indet. (E–G) proximal left humerus? (UA-2016-13-76) in distal (E), lateral (F), and medial (G) views. There are two distinct condyles (line-highlighted) in the medial view. Scale bar = 10 cm. (H-K) A right humerus? (UA-2016-13-76a) in proximal (H), medial (I), lateral (J), and distal (K; cross-sectional aspect of broken end) views. Scale bar = 10 cm. (L–N) A middle caudal vertebra (UA-2016-13-38) in dorsal (L; weathered neural processes line-highlighted), right lateral (M) and left lateral (N) views. Scale bar = 10 cm.
Figure 17
Figure 17. cf. Acrocanthosaurus, denticular tooth fragment.
UA-2016-13-83 in (A) dorsal and (B–C) lateral views. Scale bar = one cm.
Figure 18
Figure 18. Acrocanthosaurus vertebrae.
(A–F) Sacral vertebra (UA-2016-13-40) in dorsal (A), ventral (B), anterior (C), left lateral (D) right lateral (E), and posterior (F) views. The rugose nature of the anterior and posterior surface of the centrum suggests this specimen is from a juvenile. Scale bar = one cm. (G–J) A partial dorsal vertebra (UA-2016-13-39) in anterior (G), right lateral (H), left lateral (I), and posterior (J) views. Arrows point to clusters of pyrite. Scale bars = one cm.
Figure 19
Figure 19. Acrocanthosaurus hip elements.
(A–C) Proximal end of the left pubis (UA-2016-13-77) in lateral (A), medial (B), and ventral (C) views. (D–E) Proximal end of right pubis (UA-2016-13-78) in medial (D) and lateral (E) views. (F–G) Proximal ischium? (UA-2016-13-79) in lateral (F–G) and dorsal (H) views. Scale bars = five cm.
Figure 20
Figure 20. Acrocanthosaurus manus elements.
(A–F) Phalanx 1 from right digit II (UA-2016-13-45) in dorsal (A), left lateral (B), right lateral (C), ventral (D), proximal (E), and distal (F) views. (G–I) Ulnare? (UA-2016-13-58) in distal (G), proximal (H), and lateral (I) views. Scale bars = one cm.
Figure 21
Figure 21. Coelurosauria teeth.
(A) cf. Richardoestesia sp. (UA-2016-13-178) and (B) Deinonychus antirrhopus (UA-2016-13-177). Scale bars = one mm.
Figure 22
Figure 22. Deinonychus teeth: size variation.
(A) Smallest tooth, from a presumed hatchling (UA-2016-13-177, also shown in Fig. 20B, 1.9 mm crown height). (B) Slightly larger specimen, also presumably from an immature individual (UA-2016-13-82, 4.7 mm crown height). (C) Largest D. antirrhopus tooth from the Briar Site locality, presumably belonging to a mature individual (UA-2016-13-81, 12.9 mm crown height).
Figure 23
Figure 23. Nodosauridae (Ankylosauria) dermal armor.
(A–B) Right caudal plate (UA-2016-13-49) in ventral (A) and dorsal (B) views. (C) A dermal spine (UA-2016-13-50) in lateral view. (D–E) A dermal scute (UA-2016-13-51) in dorsal (D) and ventral (E) views.
Figure 24
Figure 24. Mammalia.
(A) Alticonodontinae indet. (Eutriconodonta: Triconodontidae), fragment of left p2 in lingual view. Restored outline (anterior part, to the right) based on cf. Astroconodon sp., MCZ 20023. (B) Spalacolestinae indet. (Trechnotheria: Spalacotheriidae), left P2? in lingual view. Letters denote cusps mentioned in the text; terminology from Crompton & Jenkins Jr. (1968); scale bar = one mm. (Original specimens mislaid; drawings made from photographs.)
Figure 25
Figure 25. Faunal comparison.
A comparison of faunal assemblages from medial Cretaceous formations of North America (based on Frederickson, Lipka & Cifelli, 2018). Data from: OMNH collections Antlers and Cedar Mountain (Ruby Ranch Member, Hotel Mesa V857) formations. Cloverly Fm. from Oreska, Carrano & Dzikiewicz (2013) and Arundel Fm. from Frederickson, Lipka & Cifelli (2018). Paleogeographic map for the Late Aptian-Early Albian. Green represents land, blue represents shallow seas. Highlands in the west represent the Sevier Mountains and, in the east represent the Appalachian “hills.” Outcrop distribution of the four formations are outlined in dark red, superimposed on a rough extent of the paleo-depositional basin (transparent pale pink).

References

    1. Adams TL. A new neosuchian crocodyliform from the Lower Cretaceous (late Aptian) Twin mountains Formation of north-central Texas. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2013;33(1):85–101. doi: 10.1080/02724634.2012.713277. - DOI
    1. Adams TL. Small crocodyliform from the Lower Cretaceous (late Aptian) of central Texas and its systematic relationship to the evolution of Eusuchia. Journal of Paleontology. 2014;88(5):1031–1049. doi: 10.1666/12-089. - DOI
    1. Adams TL. Small terrestrial crocodyliform from the Lower Cretaceous (late Aptian) of central Texas and its implications on the paleoecology of the Proctor Lake Dinosaur Locality. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2019;39(3):e1623226. doi: 10.1080/02724634.2019.1623226. - DOI
    1. Adams TL, Noto CR, Drumheller S. A large neosuchian crocodyliform from the Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian) Woodbine Formation of North Texas. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2017;37(4):e1349776. doi: 10.1080/02724634.2017.1349776. - DOI
    1. Agassiz L. Untersuchungen über die fossilen Fische der Lias-Formation. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefaktenkunde. 1832;3:139–149.

LinkOut - more resources