Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 18;12(4):596.
doi: 10.3390/biom12040596.

Louis Pasteur: Between Myth and Reality

Affiliations
Review

Louis Pasteur: Between Myth and Reality

Jean-Marc Cavaillon et al. Biomolecules. .

Abstract

Louis Pasteur is the most internationally known French scientist. He discovered molecular chirality, and he contributed to the understanding of the process of fermentation, helping brewers and winemakers to improve their beverages. He proposed a process, known as pasteurization, for the sterilization of wines. He established the germ theory of infectious diseases that allowed Joseph Lister to develop his antiseptic practice in surgery. He solved the problem of silkworm disease, although he had refuted the idea of Antoine Béchamp, who first considered it was a microbial infection. He created four vaccines (fowl cholera, anthrax, pig erysipelas, and rabies) in the paths of his precursors, Henri Toussaint (anthrax vaccine) and Pierre Victor Galtier (rabies vaccine). He generalized the word "vaccination" coined by Richard Dunning, Edward Jenner's friend. Robert Koch, his most famous opponent, pointed out the great ambiguity of Pasteur's approach to preparing his vaccines. Analysis of his laboratory notebooks has allowed historians to discern the differences between the legend built by his hagiographers and reality. In this review, we revisit his career, his undeniable achievements, and tell the truth about a hero who made every effort to build his own fame.

Keywords: antibiosis; infectious diseases; puerperal fever; spontaneous generation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Left: Pasteur in the French Press seen as a lay saint (Le Courrier Français, 4 April 1886); center: as an angel fighting rabies (Le Don Quichotte, 13 March 1886); right: as a revered icon after his death (Le Petit Journal, 13 October 1895). (© Institut Pasteur, Musée Pasteur).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The main predecessors recognized by Louis Pasteur (Spallanzani, Davaine, and Schwann) and his main supporters (Tyndall and Lister) (© Institut Pasteur, Musée Pasteur; © Wikipedia; © Collection of Pauls Stradiņš, Museum of History of Medicine, Riga, Latvia).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Louis Pasteur faced numerous precursors, opponents, and competitors. Some were wrong, but a few, particularly Hameau, Béchamp, Toussaint, Galtier, and Duboué, were right despite being unknown or poorly recognized by Louis Pasteur (© Wikipedia/© https://gw.geneanet.org accessed on 19 March 2022).
Figure 4
Figure 4
On 27 December 1892, for his 70th birthday, the international scientific community celebrated Pasteur’s “jubilé”. The reception took place in the great amphitheater of “la Sorbonne”. On the picture, one sees the president of France, Sadi Carnot, helping Pasteur to walk and Lister climbing a few steps to congratulate Pasteur. Oil on canvas by Jean-André Rixens (1902). © Institut Pasteur/Musée Pasteur.

References

    1. Vallery-Radot R.M.M. Pasteur, Histoire d’un Savant Par un Ignorant. J. Hetzel; Paris, France: 1883.
    1. Duclaux E. Pasteur. Histoire d’un Esprit. Imprimerie Charaire et Cie; Paris, France: 1896.
    1. Geison G.L. The Private Science of Louis Pasteur. Pasteur Princeton University Press; Princeton, NJ, USA: 1995. Princeton Legacy Library. - PubMed
    1. Cadeddu A. Pasteur and fowl cholera: Critical review of a historical account. Hist. Philos. Life Sci. 1985;7:87–104. - PubMed
    1. Cadeddu A. Pasteur and anti-anthrax vaccination: Historical and critical analysis. Hist. Philos. Life Sci. 1987;9:255–276. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources