2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00737-013-0406-3
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

The DSM-5 peripartum specifier: prospects and pitfalls

Abstract: The addition of the "with peripartum onset" specifier for mood episodes in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, and broadening the scope of the specifier to include hypomanic episodes, are welcome changes. However, the peripartum onset specifier, by failing to distinguish between "prepartum" onset and "postpartum" onset, obfuscates important differences in mood episodes that might have distinct etiologies, clinical profiles, and responses to treatment. In addition, re… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
49
13
5
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
4

Year Published

Range
2000
2000
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
53
9
1
1

Relationship

4
60

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 64 publications

(41 citation statements)
references

References 18 publications

0
37
0
4
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Potential differences between screeners are known, as the PDSS is a more sensitive screening tool that also addresses more psycho-social dimensions of postpartum depression; the EPDS provides a more conservative estimate of possible depression and measures fewer dimensions. 10 As such, it is important to consider both screeners in terms of how risk factors might correlate with overall scores and cutoffs. In bivariate associations (not shown), participants who felt more positive on average about their most recent birth had significantly lower scores on both EPDS and PDSS screeners.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 60% of participants in the LTM II sample met this cutoff. Potential differences between screeners are known, as the PDSS is a more sensitive screening tool that also addresses more psycho‐social dimensions of postpartum depression; the EPDS provides a more conservative estimate of possible depression and measures fewer dimensions 10 . As such, it is important to consider both screeners in terms of how risk factors might correlate with overall scores and cutoffs.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, EPDS and PDSS have been shown to have different sensitivies and specificities in correctly identifying women who do and do not have PPD—with the PDSS showing the highest combination of both sensitivity (true positives) and specificity (true negatives) 10 . Our descriptive findings in Table 2 did show substantial differences in the percentage of women in the clinical cutoff groups, with nearly double in the PDSS screener group compared with the EPDS screener group (63.3% vs 33.5%).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations