Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> > Come to think of it, getting PyChecker integrated w/ the interactive
> > shell would be great! Hard, I suspect, but great!
>> Certainly better than running tabnanny. :-)
>> I'm not even sure how hard it would be to add this to IDLE --
> pychecker is already a module. Maybe Neal will enjoy this challenge?
Enjoyed, past-tense. :-)
ls -l tmp/idle-patch
-rw-rw-r-- 1 neal neal 1758 Aug 5 2001 tmp/idle-patch
I'll update the patch to make it current and post on SF.
Neal
