Guido wrote:
>> > I agree. Linux is not a good role model. I think FreeBSD has done a
> > much better job with their -STABLE and -CURRENT branch naming.
>> I don't know how they do it. Can you explain?
develop against the main trunk (CURRENT), and release from
a branch (STABLE). more here:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng/index.html
debian uses UNSTABLE, TESTING, and STABLE.
http://www.debian.org/releases/
</F>
