> [Barry A. Warsaw]
> > My very limited Tim-enlightened understanding is that encoding a string
> > to UTF-8 should never produce a string with NULs.
[Franįois]
> Besides the fact that NULs encode to themselves. In fact, 0-127 encode to
> themselves, and are never produced otherwise. Also, 254 and 255 are never
> produced, I heard that some use these to escape out within an UTF-8 string.
Hm, but isn't there a way to encode a NUL that doesn't produce a NUL?
In some variant?
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
