Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Guido wrote:
>> > I still think I'd like sys.path to be a real list of real strings (not
> > necessarily representing files or directories though), with a
> > configurable set of handlers that are given a chance to deal with each
> > string in turn. (Or was this already rejected?
>> I've rejected it. Does that count? ;-)
Let's rephrase that as "-1" and I'll gladly add wy own -1 ;-)
Just
