On Apr 12, 2013, at 05:17 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
>Now, you could *further* require that the type of enum values be
>sortable....but that point you really have no excuse for not allowing
>enum values to be compared :)
I'd be more willing to give up on sorting for the base enum type's iteration
and repr. It's not crucial functionality whereas I still don't want the base
enum values to support ordered comparisons.
-Barry
