On 4/29/2013 8:24 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
> Thanks for the summary. One issue I don't see addressed here is
> int-compatibility. Am I correct to assume that nothing changes w.r.t.
> that, and that an IntEnum subclass of Enum will be provided which is
> isinstance(integer)? Does that become straightforward by nature of enum
> values being the type of their enumerations?
My only concern is that whatever you do does not break transitivity of
==. Aside from that, I will be happy with whatever you end up with and
use it as appropriate.
