Okay, I think Guido's proposal is a good compromise.
I already have a branch of dataclasses that should implement that behavior,
so perhaps it was meant to be. :)
~>Ethan Smith
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 30 Dec. 2017 11:01 am, "Ethan Smith" <ethan at ethanhs.me> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org>
> wrote:
>>> I still think it should overrides anything that's just inherited but
>> nothing that's defined in the class being decorated.
>>>>> Could you explain why you are of this opinion? Is it a concern about
> complexity of implementation?
>>> Adding a new method to a base class shouldn't risk breaking existing
> subclasses.
>> If folks want to retain the base class implementation, they can request
> that explicitly (and doing so isn't redundant at the point of subclass
> definition the way it is for methods defined in the class body).
>> Cheers,
> Nick.
>>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171229/a166d552/attachment.html>
