Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Pyromorphite vs. Graphite
Linked by archaic translations and mineralogical misunderstandings, the quarterfinals are ending in hexagons with vivid pyromorphite vs writeable graphite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Phlogopite from
Zhuyeshan deposit, Laochang ore field (Laochang Mine), Gejiu Sn-polymetallic ore field, Gejiu City, Honghe, Yunnan, China


Locality type:Deposit
Classification
Species:Phlogopite
Formula:KMg3(AlSi3O10)(OH)2
Confirmation
Validity:Believed Valid
Data
Mineral Data:Click here to view Phlogopite data
Locality Data:Click here to view Zhuyeshan deposit, Laochang ore field (Laochang Mine), Gejiu Sn-polymetallic ore field, Gejiu City, Honghe, Yunnan, China
Data Identifiers
Mindat Occurrence Record ID:1660413
Long-form Identifier:1:3:1660413:5
GUID (UUID V4):0
Nearest other occurrences of Phlogopite
6.0km (3.7 miles) ⓘKafang ore field, Gejiu Sn-polymetallic ore field, Gejiu City, Honghe, Yunnan, China
22.4km (13.9 miles) ⓘGejiu Sn-polymetallic ore field, Gejiu City, Honghe, Yunnan, China
44.3km (27.5 miles) ⓘDaping Au-polymetallic deposit, Yuanyang County, Honghe, Yunnan, China
52.9km (32.9 miles) ⓘBaimazhai Ni-Cu-(PGE) deposit, Jinping County, Honghe, Yunnan, China
54.8km (34.1 miles) ⓘChang'an Au-Cu deposit (Changanchong Au-Cu deposit), Jinping County, Honghe, Yunnan, China
76.3km (47.4 miles) ⓘGuanfang W deposit, Wenshan City, Wenshan, Yunnan, China
87.2km (54.2 miles) ⓘNâm Xe REE deposit, Mt Fansipan, Phong Tho District, Lai Châu Province, Vietnam
91.3km (56.7 miles) ⓘSouth Nâm Nâm Xe carbonatite, Nâm Nâm Xe REE deposit, Mt Fansipan, Phong Tho District, Lai Châu Province, Vietnam
References
Zhan, Yuandong, Shao, Yongjun, Xiong, Yi-Qu, Brzozowski, Matthew J., Liu, Zhongfa, Liu, Qingquan, Zhang, Yinping (2024) The key controlling factors on Sn–Cu mineralization: A case study from the world-class Gejiu Sn–Cu-polymetallic deposit. Ore Geology Reviews, 175. 106351 doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.106351
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 28, 2026 04:08:03
Go to top of page