Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Cuprite vs. Halite
While externally similar shapes, these two minerals are very different inside.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Clarkeite

A valid IMA mineral species - grandfathered
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About ClarkeiteHide

08742200017271922263738.jpg
Frank Wigglesworth Clarke
Formula:
(Na,Ca,Pb)(UO2)O(OH) · 0-1H2O
Colour:
Dark red-brown, dark brown
Lustre:
Resinous, Waxy, Greasy
Hardness:
4 - 4½
Specific Gravity:
6.29 - 6.39
Crystal System:
Trigonal
Name:
Named in 1931 by Clarence S. Ross, Edward P. Henderson, and Eugene Waldemar Posnjak in honor of Frank Wigglesworth Clarke [March 19, 1847 Boston, Massachusetts, USA - May 23, 1931 Washington, DC, USA], American mineral chemist, and former Chief Chemist of the U.S. Geological Survey. Clarke studied the composition of the Earth's crust and the unit of measure, the clarke, was named as a reference to the local enrichment of a chemical component relative to an average value for the chemistry of the crust.
Clarkeite is a waxy to resinous dark brown replacement of uraninite. It is very uncommon, but is frequently misidentified with brown gummite that is dominated by schoepite-group minerals. Frondel (1956) warned: "Clarkeite is best identified by its X-ray powder pattern. It is indistinguishable from the dark brown types of oxidized uraninite ... and from dense brown types of fourmarierite and vandendriesscheite."


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
1059
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:1059:3

IMA Classification of ClarkeiteHide

Approved, 'Grandfathered' (first described prior to 1959)
IMA Formula:
Na(U6+O2)O(OH)·nH2O
First published:
1931

Classification of ClarkeiteHide

4.GC.05

4 : OXIDES (Hydroxides, V[5,6] vanadates, arsenites, antimonites, bismuthites, sulfites, selenites, tellurites, iodates)
G : Uranyl Hydroxides
C : With additional cations; with mainly UO2(O,OH)6 hexagonal polyhedra
5.4.1.1

5 : OXIDES CONTAINING URANIUM OR THORIUM
4 : AX2O7·xH2O
7.16.32

7 : Oxides and Hydroxides
16 : Oxides of U

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
CkeIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Physical Properties of ClarkeiteHide

Resinous, Waxy, Greasy
Transparency:
Translucent
Colour:
Dark red-brown, dark brown
Streak:
Yellow-brown
Hardness:
4 - 4½ on Mohs scale
Tenacity:
Brittle
Cleavage:
None Observed
Fracture:
Conchoidal, Sub-Conchoidal
Density:
6.29 - 6.39 g/cm3 (Measured)    6.74 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of ClarkeiteHide

Type:
Biaxial (-)
RI values:
nα = 1.997 nβ = 2.098 nγ = 2.108
2V:
Measured: 30° to 50°, Calculated: 32°
Birefringence:
0.111
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.111
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
Very High (positive)
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.
Dispersion:
relatively weak
Pleochroism:
Weak
Comments:
Orange and slightly deeper orange

Chemistry of ClarkeiteHide

Mindat Formula:
(Na,Ca,Pb)(UO2)O(OH) · 0-1H2O
Element Weights:
Element% weight
U73.010 %
O19.630 %
Na7.052 %
H0.309 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
U
O
Na
H

Crystallography of ClarkeiteHide

Crystal System:
Trigonal
Class (H-M):
3m(32/m) - Hexagonal Scalenohedral
Space Group:
R3m
Setting:
R3m
Cell Parameters:
a = 3.954(1) Å, c = 17.660(3) Å
Ratio:
a:c = 1 : 4.466
Unit Cell V:
239.11 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)
Z:
3
Morphology:
Massive, dense.

Crystal StructureHide

Load
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Show
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Display Options
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
View
CIF File    Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
Rotation
Stop | Start
Labels
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
IDSpeciesReferenceLinkYearLocalityPressure (GPa)Temp (K)
0001902ClarkeiteFinch R J, Ewing R C (1997) Clarkeite: New chemical and structural data American Mineralogist 82 607-61919970293
CIF Raw Data - click here to close

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
5.903 Å(64)
3.365 Å(56)
3.195 Å(100)
2.945 Å(28)
2.707 Å(34)
1.977 Å(33)
1.8742 Å(19)
1.8554 Å(19)
1.6807 Å(14)
1.6410 Å(23)
Comments:
AM 82, p. 615; JCPDS 8-315 has extraneous and differing d-values.

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):
Paragenetic ModeEarliest Age (Ga)
Stage 7: Great Oxidation Event<2.4
47a : [Near-surface hydration of prior minerals]
47f : [Uranyl (U⁶⁺) minerals]

Type Occurrence of ClarkeiteHide

General Appearance of Type Material:
Massive, without cleavage
Place of Conservation of Type Material:
National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C., USA, 96510, R6607.
Geological Setting of Type Material:
Uranium bearing pegmatite
Associated Minerals at Type Locality:

Synonyms of ClarkeiteHide

Other Language Names for ClarkeiteHide

Dutch:Clarkeiet
German:Clarkeit
Simplified Chinese:水钠铀矿
Spanish:Clarkeita

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
30 photos of Clarkeite associated with UraniniteUO2
27 photos of Clarkeite associated with UranophaneCa(UO2)2(SiO3OH)2 · 5H2O
23 photos of Clarkeite associated with 'Gummite'
21 photos of Clarkeite associated with KasolitePb(UO2)(SiO4) · H2O
20 photos of Clarkeite associated with FourmarieritePb(UO2)4O3(OH)4 · 4H2O
12 photos of Clarkeite associated with MuscoviteKAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2
10 photos of Clarkeite associated with Rutherfordine(UO2)CO3
9 photos of Clarkeite associated with 'Cyrtolite'Zr[(SiO4),(OH)4]
3 photos of Clarkeite associated with AutuniteCa(UO2)2(PO4)2 · 10-12H2O
2 photos of Clarkeite associated with AlbiteNa(AlSi3O8)

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

4.GC.BobfinchiteNa[(UO2)8O3(OH)11] · 10H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pbcn
4.GC.10Umohoite(UO2)MoO4 · 2H2OTric.
4.GC.15SpriggitePb3(UO2)6O8(OH)2 · 3H2OMon. 2/m : B2/b

RadioactivityHide

Radioactivity:
Element % Content Activity (Bq/kg) Radiation Type
Uranium (U) 73.0096% 18,252,400 α, β, γ
Thorium (Th) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Potassium (K) 0.0000% 0 β, γ

For comparison:

  • Banana: ~15 Bq per fruit
  • Granite: 1,000–3,000 Bq/kg
  • EU exemption limit: 10,000 Bq/kg

Note: Risk is shown relative to daily recommended maximum exposure to non-background radiation of 1000 µSv/year. Note that natural background radiation averages around 2400 µSv/year so in reality these risks are probably extremely overstated! With infrequent handling and safe storage natural radioactive minerals do not usually pose much risk.

Interactive Simulator:

Note: The mass selector refers to the mass of radioactive mineral present, not the full specimen, also be aware that the matrix may also be radioactive, possibly more radioactive than this mineral!

Activity: –

DistanceDose rateRisk
1 cm
10 cm
1 m

The external dose rate (D) from a radioactive mineral is estimated by summing the gamma radiation contributions from its Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium content, disregarding daughter-product which may have a significant effect in some cases (eg 'pitchblende'). This involves multiplying the activity (A, in Bq) of each element by its specific gamma ray constant (Γ), which accounts for its unique gamma emissions. The total unshielded dose at 1 cm is then scaled by the square of the distance (r, in cm) and multiplied by a shielding factor (μshield). This calculation provides a 'worst-case' or 'maximum risk' estimate because it assumes the sample is a point source and entirely neglects any self-shielding where radiation is absorbed within the mineral itself, meaning actual doses will typically be lower. The resulting dose rate (D) is expressed in microsieverts per hour (μSv/h).

D = ((AU × ΓU) + (ATh × ΓTh) + (AK × ΓK)) / r2 × μshield

Fluorescence of ClarkeiteHide

Other InformationHide

Notes:
Readily dissolves in mineral acids and hydrochloric acid. Can be dissolved in very dilute acid (1 part acid to 4 parts water).
Health Risks:
radioactive

Internet Links for ClarkeiteHide

References for ClarkeiteHide

Reference List:

Localities for ClarkeiteHide

Showing 32 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Argentina
 
  • La Rioja Province
    • Chilecito department
      • Sañogasta
Angelelli (1984)
Brazil
 
  • Bahia
Pires et al. (2014)
Canada
 
  • Nova Scotia
    • Cumberland Co.
Chatterjee (1977)
Czech Republic
 
  • Plzeň Region
    • Tachov District
      • Zadní Chodov
Pauliš P. et al. (Kutna Hora, issue 1)
Egypt
 
  • South Sinai Governorate
Abd El-Moghny et al. (2026)
    • Abu Zeneima (Abu Zenima)
      • Umm Bugma (Um Bogma)
Abd El-Moghny et al. (2026)
Hungary
 
  • Baranya County
    • Pécs District
      • Kővágótöttös
Koch (1985)
India
 
  • Andhra Pradesh
    • Nellore District
Singh et al. (2015)
  • Jharkhand
    • East Singhbhum District
      • Jamshedpur (Tatanagar)
Dhana Raju (2019)
  • Rajasthan
American Mineralogist: 41: 127-133
Norway
 
  • Agder
Neumann (1985)
    • Lindesnes
      • Vigeland
Sverdrup (1959)
  • Buskerud
    • Krødsherad
Neumann (1985) +1 other reference
  • Nordland
    • Narvik
Husdal (2023)
Romania
 
  • Suceava County
Hîrtopanu P. et al. (2004)
Ukraine
 
  • Zhytomyr Oblast
    • Korosten Raion
Liventseva (n.d.)
USA
 
  • Alaska
    • Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area
      • Sheenjek Mining District
- (2008)
  • Maine
    • Oxford County
      • Newry
King et al. (1994)
      • Stoneham
King et al. (1994)
  • New Hampshire
    • Grafton County
      • Grafton
Frondel (1956) +1 other reference
      • Groton
Not found at this locality: Frondel (1956) +1 other reference
    • Rockingham County
      • Raymond
Smith (2005)
  • North Carolina
    • Avery County
      • Ingalls
Eric Quinter collection
    • Mitchell County
Rocks and Minerals
Roger Howell Collection
      • Penland
Ross et al. (1931) +1 other reference
Rocks and Minerals
      • Spruce Pine
Smithsonian Institution Mineral ...
        • Greasy Creek Township
Rocks and Minerals
www.excaliburmineral.com
    • Yancey County
      • Celo
        • Micaville
Finch et al. (1997) +1 other reference
      • Crabtree Creek
Rocks and Minerals
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 29, 2026 03:55:56 Page updated: September 28, 2026 16:01:50
Go to top of page