Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Pyromorphite vs. Graphite
Linked by archaic translations and mineralogical misunderstandings, the quarterfinals are ending in hexagons with vivid pyromorphite vs writeable graphite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Lüneburgite

A valid IMA mineral species - grandfathered
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About LüneburgiteHide

05141320017271924919751.jpg
Town hall of Lüneburg, Germany
Formula:
Mg3[B2(OH)6](PO4)2 · 6H2O
Colour:
White to brownish or green, colorless
Lustre:
Vitreous
Hardness:
2
Specific Gravity:
2.05
Crystal System:
Triclinic
Name:
After the type locality, Lüneburg, Germany.
Lüneburgite is found in clays with evaporite minerals (halite, sylvite, polyhalite, etc.) and has also been found in guano deposits.


Name EncodingHide

ASCII-7:
Luneburgite

Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
2458
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:2458:3

IMA Classification of LüneburgiteHide

Approved, 'Grandfathered' (first described prior to 1959)
IMA Formula:
Mg3[B2(OH)6(PO4)2](H2O)6
First published:
1870

Classification of LüneburgiteHide

6.AC.60

6 : BORATES
A : Monoborates
C : B(O,OH)4, without and with additional anions; 1(T), 1(T)+OH, etc
43.5.11.1

43 : COMPOUND PHOSPHATES, ETC.
5 : Hydrated Compound Phosphates, etc·, Containing Hydroxyl or Halogen
10.2.1

10 : Borates with other anions
2 : Borates with phosphate or arsenate

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
LbuIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Physical Properties of LüneburgiteHide

Vitreous
Transparency:
Translucent
Colour:
White to brownish or green, colorless
Hardness:
Cleavage:
Poor/Indistinct
Prismatic cleavage with an angle of about 73° (viewed microscopically). Minute pseudo-hexagonal plates.
On {010}, fair.
Density:
2.05 g/cm3 (Measured)    2.204 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of LüneburgiteHide

Type:
Biaxial (-)
RI values:
nα = 1.520 - 1.522 nβ = 1.54 - 1.541 nγ = 1.545 - 1.549
2V:
Measured: 63° , Calculated: 62° to 60°
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.025 - 0.027
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
None to Very Low
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.
Dispersion:
distinct to strong

Chemistry of LüneburgiteHide

Mindat Formula:
Mg3[B2(OH)6](PO4)2 · 6H2O
Element Weights:
Element% weight
O64.694 %
Mg14.742 %
P12.524 %
B4.372 %
H3.668 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
O
Mg
P
B
H

Crystallography of LüneburgiteHide

Crystal System:
Triclinic
Class (H-M):
1 - Pinacoidal
Space Group:
P1
Cell Parameters:
a = 6.3475(6) Å, b = 9.8027(11) Å, c = 6.2976(5) Å
α = 84.456(9)°, β = 106.402(8)°, γ = 96.400(9)°
Ratio:
a:b:c = 0.648 : 1 : 0.642
Unit Cell V:
372.69 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)
Z:
1
Morphology:
Flattened masses and nodules with fine fibrous to earthy structure. Minute pseudo-hexagonal tablets.
Twinning:
Common, by rotation about [110].

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
4.98 Å(100)
4.85 Å(70)
2.964 Å(60)
2.819 Å(45)
3.23 Å(40)
2.507 Å(35)
3.027 Å(30)

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):
Paragenetic ModeEarliest Age (Ga)
Near-surface Processes
25 : Evaporites (prebiotic)

Type Occurrence of LüneburgiteHide

Place of Conservation of Type Material:
Wroclaw University, Wroclaw, Poland, 1I-5734; National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C., USA, 162602.
Geological Setting of Type Material:
Gypsum-bearing marl.
Associated Minerals at Type Locality:

Synonyms of LüneburgiteHide

Other Language Names for LüneburgiteHide

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

6.AC.05SinhaliteMgAl(BO4)Orth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pnma
6.AC.10PseudosinhaliteMg2Al3(BO3)2(OH)O3Mon. 2/m : P21/b
6.AC.15BéhieriteTa(BO4)Tet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) : I41/amd
6.AC.15SchiavinatoiteNb(BO4)Tet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) : I41/amd
6.AC.20FroloviteCa[B(OH)4]2Tric. 1 : P1
6.AC.25HexahydroboriteCa[B(OH)4]2 · 2H2O or CaB2O4 · 6H2OMon. 2/m : B2/b
6.AC.30HenmiliteCa2Cu[B(OH)4]2(OH)4Tric. 1 : P1
6.AC.35BandyliteCu[B(OH)4]ClTet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) : P4/nmm
6.AC.40TeepleiteNa2[B(OH)4]ClTet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) : P4/nmm
6.AC.45Moydite-(Y)Y[B(OH)4](CO3)Orth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pbca
6.AC.50CarboboriteCa2Mg[B(OH)4]2(CO3)2 · 4H2OMon. 2/m
6.AC.55SulfoboriteMg3[B(OH)4]2(SO4)(OH,F)2Orth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pnma
6.AC.65SeamaniteMn2+3[B(OH)4](PO4)(OH)2Orth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m)
6.AC.70CahniteCa2[B(OH)4](AsO4)Tet. 4 : P4

Other InformationHide

IR Spectrum:
Bulganak volcano material [cm-1]: 3495, 3440, 3390s, 3250sh, 3215, 3100, 2965, 2625w, 1665, 1325sh, 1283, 1185, 1122s, 1075s, 973, 891s, 830sh, 783, 712, 664, 638, 576, 537, 520sh, 462w
Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for LüneburgiteHide

References for LüneburgiteHide

Reference List:

Localities for LüneburgiteHide

Showing 17 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Chile
 
  • Antofagasta
    • Antofagasta Province
      • Mejillones
Gupta et al. (1991)
SEM-EDS by Igor V. Pekov
China
 
Dongyan Wei (1985)
Germany
 
  • Lower Saxony
    • Göttingen District
      • Bovenden
        • Reyershausen
Braitsch (1961)
    • Lüneburg District
      • Lüneburg
C. Noellner: "Über Lüneburgit" (1876) +1 other reference
Nöllner (1870)
  • Thuringia
    • Wartburg District
      • Krayenberggemeinde
Heide et al. (1964)
Serbia
 
  • Central Serbia
    • Raška District
      • Raška
        • Jarandol Basin
          • Baljevac na Ibru
            • Bela Stena
Obradovic et al. (1992)
Turkey
 
  • Ankara Province
Helvaci et al. (2004)
  • Central Anatolia Region
    • Ankara Province
Ortı́ et al. (2002)
Turkmenistan
 
  • Balkan Region
Evseev (1995)
Mineralogical Society of America - ...
Ukraine
 
  • Crimea
    • Kerch Peninsula
      • Novoselovka Village area
Shnykov E.F. at al. (1971)
USA
 
  • California
    • Mono County
      • Mono Lake
Field collected by Gunnar Färber
  • New Mexico
Palache et al. (1951)
Palache et al. (1951)
Mineralogical Society of America - ...
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 28, 2026 21:16:01 Page updated: September 5, 2026 01:23:31
Go to top of page