Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Pyromorphite vs. Graphite
Linked by archaic translations and mineralogical misunderstandings, the quarterfinals are ending in hexagons with vivid pyromorphite vs writeable graphite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Fermiite

A valid IMA mineral species
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About FermiiteHide

05762720017272472534966.jpg
Dr. Enrico Fermi
Formula:
Na4(UO2)(SO4)3 · 3H2O
Colour:
Pale greenish-yellow
Lustre:
Vitreous
Hardness:
2½
Specific Gravity:
3.23
Crystal System:
Orthorhombic
Name:
Named by A.R. Kampf, J. Plášil, A.V. Kasatkin, J. Marty, and J. Čejka in 2015 in honor of Dr. Enrico Fermi (29 September 1901, Rome, Italy - 28 November 1954, Chicago, Illinois, USA), Italian-American theoretical and experimental physicist. He made significant contributions to quantum theory, nuclear and particle physics, and statistical mechanics. He was awarded the 1938 Nobel Prize in Physics.
Structurally related to meisserite. Also structurally somewhat similar to oppenheimerite.

Chemically related to oppenheimerite, klaprothite, péligotite, ottohahnite; plášilite and natrozippeite (basic salts); belakovskiite and meisserite (sulfate-hydrosulfates).

As typical for uranyl sulfates, U polyhedra are square pentagonal bipyramids, with U atoms surrounded by 7 O atoms (two apical bonds of the bipyramid constitute the uranyl group). There are infinite chains formed by linking the adjacent bipyramids by two bridging sulfate groups. In fermiite the chain of [(UO2)(SO4)3]4– composition is parallel to [100]. The chains are linked through 5 different Na–O polyhedra.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
46506
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:46506:3

IMA Classification of FermiiteHide

Approved
IMA Formula:
Na4(U6+O2)(S6+O4)3·3H2O
Approval year:
2014
First published:
2015

Classification of FermiiteHide

7.EC.45

7 : SULFATES (selenates, tellurates, chromates, molybdates, wolframates)
E : Uranyl sulfates
C : With medium-sized and large cations

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
FmiIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Physical Properties of FermiiteHide

Vitreous
Transparency:
Transparent
Colour:
Pale greenish-yellow
Streak:
White
Hardness:
2½ on Mohs scale
Tenacity:
Brittle
Cleavage:
None Observed
no cleavage
Fracture:
Conchoidal
Density:
3.23 g/cm3 (Measured)    3.313 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of FermiiteHide

Type:
Biaxial (+)
RI values:
nα = 1.527(1) nβ = 1.534(1) nγ = 1.567(1)
2V:
Measured: 51° , Calculated: 50°
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.040
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
None to Very Low
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.
Dispersion:
r < v, distinct.
Pleochroism:
Visible
Comments:
X, Y = colourless, Z = pale greenish yellow; X = Y < Z

Chemistry of FermiiteHide

Mindat Formula:
Na4(UO2)(SO4)3 · 3H2O
Element Weights:
Element% weight
O38.623 %
U33.800 %
S13.660 %
Na13.058 %
H0.859 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.

Crystallography of FermiiteHide

Crystal System:
Orthorhombic
Class (H-M):
mm2 - Pyramidal
Space Group:
Pmn21
Setting:
Pmn21
Cell Parameters:
a = 11.8407(12) Å, b = 7.8695(5) Å, c = 15.3255(19) Å
Ratio:
a:b:c = 1.505 : 1 : 1.947
Unit Cell V:
1428 ų
Z:
4
Morphology:
Prisms

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
7.71 Å(43)
7.01 Å(100)
6.00 Å(49)
4.70 Å(42)
3.476 Å(85)
3.336 Å(55)
3.131 Å(57)
2.762 Å(46)
Comments:
From type description

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):
Paragenetic ModeEarliest Age (Ga)
Stage 7: Great Oxidation Event<2.4
47a : [Near-surface hydration of prior minerals]
47b : [Sulfates and sulfites]
47f : [Uranyl (U⁶⁺) minerals]
Stage 10b: Anthropogenic minerals<10 Ka
55 : Anthropogenic mine minerals
Geological Setting:
"Common Associated Minerals" = general assemblage at the TL

Type Occurrence of FermiiteHide

General Appearance of Type Material:
prisms with {101} face habit, up to ~0.5 mm long; in subparallel or irregular aggregates. Other forms reported: {011}, {110}, {010}, {001}
Place of Conservation of Type Material:
Cotype material is deposited in the collections of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90007, USA, catalogue numbers 65546, 65547 and 65548, and the Fersman Mineralogical Museum of the Russian
Geological Setting of Type Material:
As a secondary alteration phase
Associated Minerals at Type Locality:

Synonyms of FermiiteHide

Other Language Names for FermiiteHide

Dutch:Fermiiet
German:Fermiit

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

7.EC.Nitscheite(NH4)2[(UO2)2(SO4)3(H2O)2] · 3H2OMon. 2/m
7.EC.Beshtauite(NH4)2(UO2)(SO4)2 · 2H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
7.EC.Oldsite-(K)K2Fe2+[(UO2)(SO4)2]2(H2O)8Orth. mm2 : Pmn21
7.EC.AdolfpateraiteK(UO2)(SO4)(OH)(H2O)Mon. 2/m : P21/b
7.EC.Libbyite(NH4)2(Na2◻)[(UO2)2(SO4)3(H2O)]2 · 7H2OTet. 422 : P41212
7.EC.SeaborgiteLiK2Na6(UO2)(SO4)5(SO3OH)(H2O)Tric. 1 : P1
7.EC.05ZinczippeiteZn(UO2)2(SO4)O2 · 3.5H2OMon. 2/m : B2/m
7.EC.05ZippeiteK3(UO2)4(SO4)2O3(OH) · 3H2OMon. 2 : B2
7.EC.05CobaltzippeiteCo(UO2)2(SO4)O2 · 3.5H2OMon. 2/m : B2/m
7.EC.05NickelzippeiteNi2(UO2)6(SO4)3(OH)10 · 16H2OMon.
7.EC.05Redcanyonite(NH4)2Mn[(UO2)4O4(SO4)2](H2O)4Mon. 2/m : B2/m
7.EC.05NatrozippeiteNa5(UO2)8(SO4)4O5(OH)3 · 12H2OMon. 2/m : P21/m
7.EC.05MagnesiozippeiteMg(UO2)2(SO4)O2 · 3.5H2OMon. 2/m : B2/m
7.EC.05Ammoniozippeite(NH4)2[(UO2)2(SO4)O2] · H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Cmca
7.EC.05PlavnoiteK0.8Mn0.6[(UO2)2O2(SO4)] · 3.5H2OMon. 2/m : B2/m
7.EC.10RabejaciteCa(UO2)4(SO4)2(OH)6 · 6H2OTric. 1 : P1
7.EC.10Svornostite-(NH4)(NH4)2Mg(UO2)2(SO4)4(H2O)8Orth. mm2 : Pmn21
7.EC.10Svornostite-(K)K2Mg[(UO2)(SO4)2]2(H2O)8Orth. mm2 : Pmn21
7.EC.15Sejkoraite-(Y)Y2(UO2)8(SO4)4O6(OH)2 · 26H2OTric. 1 : P1
7.EC.15MarécottiteMg3(UO2)8(SO4)4O6(OH)2 · 28H2OTric. 1 : P1
7.EC.15HubbarditeMg(H2O)6[(UO2)2O(OH)(SO4)]2 · 8H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Fddd
7.EC.20PseudojohanniteCu3(UO2)4(SO4)2O4(OH)2 · 12H2OTric. 1 : P1
7.EC.40BluelizarditeNa7(UO2)(SO4)4Cl(H2O)2Mon. 2/m : B2/b
7.EC.45MeisseriteNa5(UO2)(SO4)3(SO3OH)(H2O)Tric. 1 : P1
7.EC.45OppenheimeriteNa2(UO2)(SO4)2 · 3H2OTric. 1 : P1
7.EC.50FeynmaniteNa(UO2)(SO4)(OH) · 3.5H2OMon.
7.EC.50PlášiliteNa(UO2)(SO4)(OH) · 2H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
7.EC.55GeschieberiteK2(UO2)(SO4)2 · 2H2OOrth. mm2 : Pna21
7.EC.60OttohahniteNa6(UO2)2(SO4)5(H2O)7 · 1.5H2OTric. 1 : P1
7.EC.65PéligotiteNa6(UO2)(SO4)4 · 4H2OTric. 1 : P1
7.EC.70KlaprothiteNa6(UO2)(SO4)4 · 4H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
7.EC.75Lussierite Na10[(UO2)(SO4)4](SO4)2 · 3(H2O)Mon. m : Bb
7.EC.80NavrotskyiteK2Na10(UO2)3(SO4)9 · 2H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pbcm
7.EC.85Pseudomeisserite-(NH4)(NH4)2Na4[(UO2)2(SO4)5] · 4H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
7.EC.90WetherilliteNa2Mg(UO2)2(SO4)4 · 18H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b

RadioactivityHide

Radioactivity:
Element % Content Activity (Bq/kg) Radiation Type
Uranium (U) 33.8003% 8,450,075 α, β, γ
Thorium (Th) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Potassium (K) 0.0000% 0 β, γ

For comparison:

  • Banana: ~15 Bq per fruit
  • Granite: 1,000–3,000 Bq/kg
  • EU exemption limit: 10,000 Bq/kg

Note: Risk is shown relative to daily recommended maximum exposure to non-background radiation of 1000 µSv/year. Note that natural background radiation averages around 2400 µSv/year so in reality these risks are probably extremely overstated! With infrequent handling and safe storage natural radioactive minerals do not usually pose much risk.

Interactive Simulator:

Note: The mass selector refers to the mass of radioactive mineral present, not the full specimen, also be aware that the matrix may also be radioactive, possibly more radioactive than this mineral!

Activity: –

DistanceDose rateRisk
1 cm
10 cm
1 m

The external dose rate (D) from a radioactive mineral is estimated by summing the gamma radiation contributions from its Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium content, disregarding daughter-product which may have a significant effect in some cases (eg 'pitchblende'). This involves multiplying the activity (A, in Bq) of each element by its specific gamma ray constant (Γ), which accounts for its unique gamma emissions. The total unshielded dose at 1 cm is then scaled by the square of the distance (r, in cm) and multiplied by a shielding factor (μshield). This calculation provides a 'worst-case' or 'maximum risk' estimate because it assumes the sample is a point source and entirely neglects any self-shielding where radiation is absorbed within the mineral itself, meaning actual doses will typically be lower. The resulting dose rate (D) is expressed in microsieverts per hour (μSv/h).

D = ((AU × ΓU) + (ATh × ΓTh) + (AK × ΓK)) / r2 × μshield

Fluorescence of FermiiteHide

Bright greenishwhite fluorescence

Other InformationHide

Notes:
Easily soluble in RT H2O; Raman bands [cm-1]: 3540, 3465, 3285; (O–H stretching); 1606w (water bending); weak with shoulders: 1228, 1180, 1120, 1104, 1080 [ν3 sulfate groups antisymmetric stretching]; 1013s + 996s [ν1 sulfate groups symmetric stretching]; 922w [ν3 uranyl groups antisymmetric stretching]; 830vs with 860sh and 813sh [ν1 uranyl groups symmetric stretching]; 638w, 616w, 583w [ν4(δ) sulfate groups]; 506, 443, 384 [ν2(δ) sulfate bending]; 207 [ν2(δ) uranyl groups]; below 200 (lattice vibrations)
Health Risks:
Radioactive

Internet Links for FermiiteHide

References for FermiiteHide

Localities for FermiiteHide

Showing 2 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
USA (TL)
 
  • Utah
    • San Juan County
      • Red Canyon Mining District
Williams et al. (2015) +2 other references
Kampf et al. (2018)
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 28, 2026 22:38:17 Page updated: August 20, 2026 01:10:39
Go to top of page