Jump to content

Anadiplosis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anadiplosis (/ænədɪˈplsɪs/ AN-ə-di-PLOH-sis; Greek: ἀναδίπλωσις, anadíplōsis, "a doubling, folding up") is the repetition of the last word of a preceding clause.[1] The word is used at the end of a sentence and then used again at the beginning of the next sentence,[2] often to create climax.[3] It is also sometimes referred to as reduplicatio or the redouble.[1]

Etymology

[edit]

Anadiplosis comes directly from Latin anadiplosis which comes from Greek anadiplosis (Greek: ἀναδίπλωσις; convolution; revolution, duplication) which is derived from anadiploesthai (to double back; to make double) from ana- (Greek: ἀνα-; back) and diploun (Greek: διπλόος; to double; to fold over).[4]

Rhetorical use

[edit]

The device used successively can create a chain of logic; for example, the following phrase connects the initial neutral phrase ("ideas") to the more august idea of destiny: "Ideas shape actions. Actions shape character. Character shapes destiny." This can serve to reinforce the underlying argument.[2] These anadiploses can provide the "illusion of logic," as said by Mark Forsyth; the structure's connectivity of individual points and subsequent doubling-down of them increases its strength; the device, therefore, may be used to falsely confirm an argument (e.g. in a fallacy of four terms).[5]:52 Consecutive emphatic anadiploses are sometimes referred to by concatenation (first coined by Nicolas Beauzée); they are also sometimes called linked anadiploses.[6]:108

Anadiplosis can also give a sense of harmony, rhythm, and momentum between clauses or ideas as well as. For example, Milton's phrase in Lycidas, "For Lycidas is dead, dead ere his prime," connects the two clauses with a shared word: dead.[2][5]:53 This can additionally be seen in colloquially conversation, in which anadiplosis may be used to link one's reply with another; thus, in Ulysses, Joyce writes: "To Stephen, who has described the soul as a 'simple substance,' Bloom replies: 'Simple? I shouldn't think that is the proper word.'"[6]:36

Anadiplosis may be used to emphasize the repeated word or phrase as well as build overall emotional intensity to create climax.[2] For example, in the below example from Romans 5:3–5:

More than that, we rejoice in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance,
endurance produces character, and character produces hope,
and hope does not disappoint us, because God's love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit which has been given to us

Paul progressively increases the perceived importance of each element (suffering less important than endurance which less important than hope ending with the most important thing to Paul: God) building to the final climax.[7]

Examples

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  • Public Domain This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chambers, Ephraim, ed. (1728). "Anadiplosis" (PDF). Cyclopædia, or an Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences. Vol. 1 (1st ed.). James and John Knapton, et al. p. 82.
  • Corbett, Edward P.J. Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. Oxford University Press, New York, 1971.
  • Smyth, Herbert Weir (1984). Greek Grammar. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. p. 673. ISBN 0-674-36250-0.
  1. 1 2 "Anadiplosis". Brigham Young University. Archived from the original on 9 July 2014. Retrieved 12 May 2014.
  2. 1 2 3 4 "Anadiplosis". Literary Devices. Retrieved July 20, 2026.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  3. Lanham, Richard A. (1991). A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 10. ISBN 0-520-07669-9.
  4. "anadiplosis". Etymonline. Retrieved July 20, 2026.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  5. 1 2 Forsyth, Mark (2013). The Elements of Eloquence. ISBN 9780425276181.
  6. 1 2 Dupriez, Bernard (1991). A Dictionary of Literary Devices. Translated by Halsall, Albert W. University of Toronto Press. ISBN 9780745010564.
  7. Corbett, Edward P. J. (1965). Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. Oxford University Press. pp. 436–437.
[edit]