Jump to content

Islamic extremism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Muslim protest against the anti-Islamic film Innocence of Muslims in Sydney, 15 September 2012. The protesters carry signs reading "Behead all those who insult the Prophet" and "Our dead are in Paradise. Your dead are in HELL!"

Islamic extremism is characterised by extremist beliefs, behaviours, and ideologies adhered to by some Muslims within Islam. The term "Islamic extremism" is contentious, encompassing a spectrum of definitions, ranging from academic interpretations of Islamic supremacy to the notion that all ideologies other than Islam have failed and are inferior.[1] Islamic extremism is different from Islamic fundamentalism or Islamism. Islamic fundamentalism refers to a movement among Muslims advocating a return to the fundamental principles of an Islamic state in Muslim-majority countries. Meanwhile, Islamism constitutes a form of political Islam. However, both Islamic fundamentalism and Islamism have also been classified as subsets of Islamic extremism by some. Acts of violence committed by Islamic terrorists and jihadists are associated with these extremist beliefs, while many Muslims see extremists as not following Islam. The term "Islamism" has been criticised as having been given connotations of violence, extremism, and violations of human rights, by the Western mass media, leading to Islamophobia and stereotyping.[2] During the Cold War following World War II, the United States and the United Kingdom launched covert and overt campaigns to encourage and strengthen Islamic fundamentalist groups in the Middle East, North Africa, and southern Asia. These groups were seen as a hedge against potential expansion by the Soviet Union, and as a counterweight against nationalist and socialist movements that were seen as a threat to the interests of the Western nations.[3][4][5] In a 2018 interview with The Washington Post, Mohammed bin Salman, the de facto ruler of Saudi Arabia, said that Saudi Arabia's International propagation of the Salafi movement and Wahhabism campaign "was rooted in the Cold War, when allies asked Saudi Arabia to use its resources to prevent inroads in Muslim countries by the Soviet Union."[6] According to some estimates, between the 1960s and 2016, Saudi Arabia funnelled over US$100 billion to spread Wahhabi Islam.[7] According to political scientist Alex Alexiev, the impetus for the international propagation of Salafism and Wahhabism was "the largest worldwide propaganda campaign ever mounted",[8] David A. Kaplan described it as "dwarfing the Soviets' propaganda efforts at the height of the Cold War".[8] In 2013, the European Parliament identified Wahhabism as the main source of global terrorism.[9]

Definitions

[edit]

Academic definition

[edit]

The academic definition of radical Islam consists of two parts:

  • Islamic thought that states that all ideologies other than Islam, whether associated with the West (capitalism or democracy) or the East (communism or socialism), have failed and demonstrated their bankruptcy.[1]
  • Islamic thought that states that (semi-)secular regimes are wrong because of their negligence of Islam.[10]

UK High Court definition

[edit]

The UK High Court has ruled in two cases on Islamic extremism and provided definitions.

Aside from those, two major definitions have been offered for Islamic extremism, incorporating overlapping yet distinct aspects of extreme interpretations and pursuits of Islamic ideology:

  • The use of violent tactics such as bombings and assassinations for achieving perceived Islamic goals (see Jihadism; Zeyno Baran, Senior Fellow and Director of the Center for Eurasian Policy at the Hudson Institute, prefers the term Islamist extremism).[11]
  • An extremely conservative view of Islam,[12] which does not necessarily entail violence[13] (see also Islamic fundamentalism; Baran again prefers the term Islamism).[11]

In 2019, the United States Institute of Peace issued a report on extremism in fragile states, advocating the establishment of a shared understanding, an operational framework for prevention, and international cooperation.[14]

Key influences of radical Islam

[edit]

Early Islam

[edit]

According to the academic definition of radical Islam, the second condition for something to be designated radical Islam is that it is anti-governmental. Consequently, the presence of a government is a prerequisite. Although the Peace of Westphalia established in 1648 introduced the concept of the nation-state, the writings from the formative centuries of Islamic history remain influential to contemporary writings considered radical in the modern Muslim world. Key influences stemming from early Islam include:

Kharijites

[edit]

Islamic extremism dates back to the early history of Islam with the emergence of the Kharijites in the 7th century CE.[15] The original schism between Kharijites, Sunnīs, and Shīʿas arose over the political and religious succession to the leadership of the Muslim community (Ummah) following the death of the Islamic prophet Muhammad.[15] From their essentially political stance, the Kharijites developed extreme doctrines that set them apart from both mainstream Sunnī and Shīʿa Muslims.[15] Shīʿas believe ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib was the true successor to Muhammad, while Sunnīs consider Abu Bakr to hold that position. The Kharijites broke away from both groups during the First Fitna (the first Islamic Civil War);[15] they were particularly noted for adopting a radical approach to takfīr (excommunication), declaring both Sunnī and Shīʿa Muslims to be either infidels (kuffār) or false Muslims (munāfiḳūn), and deeming them worthy of death for perceived apostasy (ridda).[15][16][17]

Islamic tradition traces the origin of the Kharijites to the battle between ʿAlī and Mu'awiya at Siffin in 657 CE. When ʿAlī faced a military stalemate and agreed to submit the dispute to arbitration, some members of his party withdrew their support. "Judgement belongs to God alone" (لاَ حُكْمَ إلَا لِلّهِ) became the slogan of these secessionists.[15] They also referred to themselves as al-Shurat ("the Vendors"), reflecting their willingness to give their lives in martyrdom.[18]

These early Kharijites opposed both ʿAlī and Mu'awiya and appointed their own leaders. They were decisively defeated by ʿAlī, who was later assassinated by a Kharijite. Kharijites subsequently engaged in guerrilla warfare against the Umayyads, becoming a major force during the Second Fitna (the second Islamic Civil War), when they temporarily controlled more territory than any of their rivals. They presented a significant challenge to Ibn al-Zubayr's bid for the caliphate, controlling Yamama and most of southern Arabia, and capturing the oasis town of al-Ta'if.[18]

The Azariqa, considered the most extreme Kharijite faction, controlled parts of western Iran under the Umayyads until their defeat in 699 CE. The more moderate Ibadi Kharijites lasted longer, continuing to hold political influence in North and East Africa and eastern Arabia during the 'Abbasid period. Because of their readiness to declare opponents apostates, extreme Kharijite factions frequently fragmented into small groups. A key consensus among these splinter groups was their view of the caliphate, which diverged from other Islamic theories on two primary points:

  • First, they were principled egalitarians, maintaining that any pious Muslim ("even an Ethiopian slave") could become caliph, and that family or tribal lineage was irrelevant. The sole criteria for leadership were personal piety and communal acceptance.
  • Second, they maintained that believers had a duty to depose any leader who fell into error. Applying these principles to early Islamic history, Kharijites recognised only Abu Bakr and 'Umar as legitimate caliphs; of 'Uthman's rule, they accepted only the first six years, while rejecting 'Ali entirely.

By the time Ibn al-Muqaffa' composed his political treatise early in the 'Abbasid era, the Kharijites were no longer a primary political threat in the Islamic heartlands. However, the memory of their challenge to unity and their ideological radicalism continued to influence Islamic political and religious thought.[18] The Ibadis represent the only Kharijite branch surviving into modern times.

Ibn Taymiyyah

[edit]

Ottoman Empire

[edit]

The Kadızadelis (also Qādīzādali) were a seventeenth-century puritanical reform movement in the Ottoman Empire following Kadızade Mehmed (1582–1635), a revivalist preacher. Kadızade and his followers were staunch opponents of Sufism and popular religious practices. They condemned various Ottoman traditions as bidʻah ("non-Islamic innovations") and advocated "reviving the beliefs and practices of the first Muslim generation in the first/seventh century" ("enjoining good and forbidding wrong").[19]

Driven by impassioned rhetoric, Kadızade Mehmed attracted numerous followers seeking to eliminate perceived corruption across the Ottoman Empire. Movement leaders held official posts as preachers in major mosques in Baghdad, combining popular support with backing from within the state apparatus.[20] Between 1630 and 1680, violent clashes occurred between the Kadızadelis and their opponents. As the movement developed, adherents entered "mosques, tekkes and Ottoman coffeehouses in order to mete out punishments to those contravening their version of orthodoxy."

Modern Islam

[edit]

Salafism and Wahhabism

[edit]

The Salafiyya movement is a conservative,[21] Islahi (reform)[22] movement within Sunnī Islam that emerged in the second half of the 19th century and advocates a return to the traditions of the "devout ancestors" (Salaf al-Salih). It has been described as the "fastest-growing Islamic movement", with scholars expressing diverse views across social, theological, and political spectra. Salafis follow a doctrine that can be summed up as taking "a fundamentalist approach to Islam, emulating the Prophet Muhammad and his earliest followers—al-salaf al-salih, the 'pious forefathers'....They reject religious innovation, or bidʻah, and support the implementation of Sharia (Islamic law)."[23] The Salafi movement is often divided into three categories: the largest group are the purists (or quietists), who avoid politics; the second largest group are the militant activists, who get involved in politics; the third and smallest group are the jihadists, who constitute a minority.[23] Most violent Islamist groups stem from the Salafi-jihadist movement and its subgroups.[24] In recent years, jihadi-Salafist doctrines have often been associated with armed insurgencies and terrorist organisations targeting civilians, both Muslims and non-Muslims, such as al-Qaeda, ISIL/ISIS, and Boko Haram.[25][26][23][24] The second-largest group, the Salafi activists, has a long tradition of political involvement, including within organisations such as the Muslim Brotherhood. In the aftermath of wide-scale repression following the Arab Spring, accompanied by political setbacks, activist Salafi movements experienced a decline. The quietists, representing the largest segment, advocate political disengagement and maintain allegiance to established rulers to avoid fitna (chaos).[23]

The Wahhabi movement was founded by the Ḥanbalī scholar and theologian Muhammad ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab,[27][28][29] a religious preacher from the Najd region in the Arabian Peninsula,[30][31][32][33][34] and was instrumental in the rise of the House of Saud to power in the Arabian Peninsula.[27] Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab sought to revive and purify Islam from what he perceived as non-Islamic popular religious beliefs and practices by returning to what he believed were the fundamental principles of the Islamic religion.[31][32][33][34] His works were generally short, full of quotations from the Quran and Hadith literature, such as his main theological treatise, Kitāb at-Tawḥīd (Arabic: كتاب التوحيد; "The Book of Oneness").[31][32][33][34] He taught that the primary doctrine of Islam was the uniqueness and oneness of God (tawḥīd), and denounced what he held to be popular religious practices akin to heretical innovation (bidʿah) and polytheism (shirk).[31][32][33][34]

Wahhabism has been described as a conservative, strict, and fundamentalist branch of Sunnī Islam,[35] with puritan views,[35] believing in a literal interpretation of the Quran.[27] The terms "Wahhabism" and "Salafism" are sometimes invoked interchangeably, although the designation "Wahhabi" is specifically applied to the followers of Muhammad ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab and his reformist doctrines.[27] The label "Wahhabi" was not claimed by his followers, who usually refer to themselves as al-Muwaḥḥidūn ("affirmers of the singularity of God"), but is rather employed by Western scholars and critics.[27][28][32] Starting in the mid-1970s and 1980s, the international propagation of Salafism and Wahhabism within Sunnī Islam,[35] favoured by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia[30][36][37] and other Arab states of the Persian Gulf, achieved what French political scientist Gilles Kepel defined as a "preeminent position of strength in the global expression of Islam."[38]

Twenty-two months after the September 11 attacks, when the FBI considered al-Qaeda "the number one terrorist threat to the United States", journalist Stephen Schwartz and U.S. Senator Jon Kyl stated during a June 2003 hearing before the Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology, and Homeland Security of the U.S. Senate that "Wahhabism is the source of the overwhelming majority of terrorist atrocities in today's world".[39] As part of the global "War on terror", Wahhabism has been described by the European Parliament, Western security analysts, and think tanks such as the RAND Corporation as "a source of global terrorism".[39][40] Furthermore, Wahhabism has been accused of causing division within the Muslim community (Ummah) and criticised for its followers' destruction of historic sites associated with the early history of Islam and the first generation of Muslims (Muhammad's family and his companions) in Saudi Arabia.[41][42][43][44]

Contemporary Islam

[edit]
Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri of al-Qaeda promoted the overthrow of secular governments.[45][46][47]

The contemporary period begins after 1924. With the defeat and dissolution of the Ottoman Empire (1908–1922), the Ottoman Caliphate was also abolished. This event heavily influenced Islamic thought in general, as well as what would later be termed radical Islamic thought.[48] Key thinkers who wrote about Islam in the 20th century, especially concerning jihad, include Muhammad Abduh, Rashid Rida, Hassan al-Banna, Abul A'la Maududi, and Sayyid Qutb.

Sayyid Qutb, an Egyptian Islamist ideologue and prominent figure in the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, was influential in promoting Pan-Islamist ideology in the 1960s.[49] Following Qutb's execution by the Egyptian government under the regime of Gamal Abdel Nasser, Ayman al-Zawahiri formed the organisation Egyptian Islamic Jihad to replace the government with an Islamic state reflecting Qutb's vision of Islamic revival.[50] Qutbist ideology has influenced jihadist movements and terrorist groups seeking to overthrow secular governments, notably Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri of al-Qaeda,[45][46][47] as well as the Salafi-jihadi group ISIL/ISIS.[51] Moreover, Qutb's works have frequently been cited by bin Laden and Anwar al-Awlaki.[52][53][54][55][56][57]

Sayyid Qutb has been described by scholars as a foundational figure of modern radical Islam.[47][49][58] Unlike other Islamic thinkers mentioned above, Qutb was not an apologist.[58] He was a leading ideologue of the Muslim Brotherhood and among the first to articulate these anathemising principles in his magnum opus Fī ẓilāl al-Qurʾān (In the Shade of the Qurʾān) and his 1966 manifesto Maʿālim fīl-ṭarīq (Milestones), which led to his execution by the Egyptian government.[58][59] Other Salafi movements in the Middle East and North Africa and across the Muslim world adopted many of his principles.[47][58]

According to Qutb, the Muslim community (Ummah) had been absent for centuries, reverting to jahiliyah (pre-Islamic ignorance) because societies failed to enforce sharia law.[47][58] To restore Islam and free Muslims from what he considered the clutches of ignorance, Qutb advocated rejecting secular societal norms, establishing an ideological vanguard modelled on early Muslims, and preparing for jihad against jahili governance to overthrow it.[47][58] Qutbism, the radical Islamist ideology derived from Qutb's writings,[47] was subsequently rejected by many mainstream Muslim scholars and several leaders within the Muslim Brotherhood, such as Yusuf al-Qaradawi.

Active Islamic extremist groups

[edit]

Groups

[edit]
Group name Banner Home base Leaders Strength Casualties Ideology
Al-Qaeda Afghanistan, Pakistan, and MENA region Osama bin Laden  (1988–2011)
Ayman al-Zawahiri  (2011–2022)
Saif al-Adel (de facto; 2022–present)
300–3,000[60][61] 4,400 casualties[62] Sunnī Islamist and militant terrorist organisation which aims to "restore Islam", establish "true Islamic states", implement sharia law, and remove non-Muslim influences from the Muslim world, following the doctrine and teachings of Sayyid Qutb.[63] The name translates to "Organisation of the Base of Jihad".
Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb Kabylie Mountains, Algeria Abdelmalek Droukdel  (2007–2020) 800–1,000+[64] 200+ AQIM is a Sunnī Islamist and militant terrorist organisation which aims to overthrow the Government of Algeria and replace it with an Islamic state.
Ansar al-Sharia in Yemen
(a.k.a. Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula)
Yemen Nasir al-Wuhayshi  (2011–2015)
Qasim al-Raymi  (2015–2020)[65]
2,000+ Over 250 killed in the 2012 Sana'a bombing and 2013 Sana'a attack.[66] AQAP is considered the most active[67] of al-Qaeda's branches, or "franchises", that emerged due to weakening central leadership.[68] The U.S. government considers AQAP the most dangerous al-Qaeda branch due to its emphasis on targeting overseas interests.[66][69]
al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Myanmar Asim Umar  300[70][71] Claims 6 killed in assassinations; naval frigate hijacking attempted in 2014. AQIS is a Sunnī Islamist and militant terrorist organisation which aims to overthrow the governments of Pakistan, India, Myanmar, and Bangladesh to establish an Islamic state.
Boko Haram
(ISWAP)
North-eastern Nigeria, Chad, Niger, Mali, and northern Cameroon[72] Mohammed Yusuf  (2002–2009)
Abubakar Shekau  (2009–2021)
500–9,000[73][74][75] Since 2009, killed over 20,000 and displaced 2.3 million. Name translates to "Western education is forbidden"; founded as a Sunnī fundamentalist group influenced by Wahhabism, advocating strict sharia law.[72] In 2015, pledged allegiance to ISIL, operating as Islamic State's West Africa Province (ISWAP).[72]
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
(ISIL / ISIS / Daesh)
Iraq and Syria Abu Musab al-Zarqawi  (1999–2006)
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi  (2010–2019)
Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurashi  (2019–2022)[76]
Abu al-Hasan al-Hashimi al-Qurashi  (2022)[77]
Abu al-Hussein al-Husseini al-Qurashi  (2022–2023)
Abu Hafs al-Hashimi al-Qurashi (2023–present)
40,000–200,000 at peak across all regions[78][79] Over 30,000 killed, including targeted campaigns against Shīʿa Muslims, Christians, Yazidis, and other minority groups.[72][80] Salafi-jihadist and Sunnī militant terrorist organisation following a strict Wahhabi interpretation.[81] Gained significant territory in Iraq and Syria in 2014 before facing military intervention from an international coalition.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan
(TTP / Pakistani Taliban)
North-west Pakistan Maulana Fazlullah  25,000[82] Hundreds TTP is an umbrella organisation of Sunnī Islamist and militant groups operating along the Afghan–Pakistani border.
Jaish-e-Mohammed Kashmir Masood Azhar Aims to separate Jammu and Kashmir from India and unite it with Pakistan. Operates primarily in the Kashmir region.
Lashkar-e-Taiba
(LeT)
Kashmir Hafiz Saeed Aims to introduce an Islamic state in South Asia and annex Jammu and Kashmir to Pakistan. Active in South Asia since at least 1993.[83]
National Thowheeth Jama'ath Sri Lanka Zahran Hashim  269 (excluding 9 bombers) Aims to establish an Islamic state in Sri Lanka; carried out the 2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings.

Foreign political support

[edit]

According to British historian Mark Curtis in Secret Affairs: Britain's Collusion with Radical Islam, Britain supported radical Islamic groups to counter secular nationalism because nationalist movements sought to control their domestic resources for internal development, which challenged British interests.[84] The United States similarly supported radical Islamic factions as a counterweight against secular nationalism, which was viewed as a threat to Western geopolitical influence. Noam Chomsky and his co-authors also argue that during the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel targeted Egypt and Syria as bastions of secular Arab nationalism opposing Saudi Arabia, which they considered the primary sponsor of radical Islam.[85]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 Cook, David (2015). Understanding Jihad. University of California Press. p. 103. ISBN 9780520287327.
  2. William E. Shepard; FranÇois Burgat; James Piscatori; Armando Salvatore (2009). "Islamism". In John L. Esposito (ed.). The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195305135. Archived from the original on 4 February 2017. Retrieved 3 February 2017. The term "Islamism/Islamist" has come into increasing use in recent years to denote the views of those Muslims who claim that Islam, or more specifically, the Islamic sharīʿah, provides guidance for all areas of human life, individual and social, and who therefore call for an "Islamic State" or an "Islamic Order." [...] Today it is one of the recognized alternatives to "fundamentalist", along with "political Islam" in particular. [...] Current terminology usually distinguishes between "Islam," [...] and "Islamism", referring to the ideology of those who tend to signal openly, in politics, their Muslim religion. [...] the term has often acquired a quasi-criminal connotation close to that of political extremism, religious sectarianism, or bigotry. In Western mainstream media, "Islamists" are those who want to establish, preferably through violent means, an "Islamic state" or impose sharīʿah (Islamic religious law)—goals that are often perceived merely as a series of violations of human rights or the rights of women. In the Muslim world, insiders use the term as a positive reference. In the academic sphere, although it is still debated, the term designates a more complex phenomenon.
  3. Dreyfuss, Robert (2005). Devil's game: how the United States helped unleash fundamentalist Islam. The American empire project. New York: A Holt Paperback. pp. 1–4. ISBN 978-0-8050-7652-3.
  4. Davidson, Christopher M. (2016). Shadow Wars: The Secret Struggle for the Middle East. La Vergne: Oneworld Publications. pp. 43–45. ISBN 978-1-78607-002-9.
  5. Curtis, Mark (2012). Secret affairs: Britain's collusion with radical Islam (New updated version ed.). London: Serpent's Tail. pp. 65–68. ISBN 978-1-84668-764-8.
  6. "Saudi prince denies Kushner is 'in his pocket'". The Washington Post. 23 March 2018. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on 1 July 2025. Retrieved 26 January 2026.
  7. "'Tsunami of money' from Saudi Arabia funding 24,000 Pakistan madrassas". The Economic Times. 30 January 2016. ISSN 0013-0389. Archived from the original on 12 March 2026. Retrieved 26 January 2026.
  8. 1 2 Jr, Frank Gaffney (8 December 2003). "Waging the 'War of Ideas'". Center for Security Policy. Archived from the original on 6 March 2026. Retrieved 26 January 2026.
  9. Reporters, Telegraph (29 March 2016). "What is Wahhabism? The reactionary branch of Islam from Saudi Arabia said to be 'the main source of global terrorism'". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Archived from the original on 29 May 2020. Retrieved 26 January 2026.
  10. Cook, David (2015). Understanding Jihad. University of California Press. p. 107. ISBN 9780520287327.
  11. 1 2 Baran, Zeyno (10 July 2008). "The Roots of Violent Islamist Extremism and Efforts to Counter It" (PDF). Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 March 2021. Retrieved 11 November 2011.
  12. Brian R. Farmer (2007). Understanding radical Islam: medieval ideology in the twenty-first century. Peter Lang. p. 36. ISBN 978-0-8204-8843-1.
  13. Jason F. Isaacson; Colin Lewis Rubenstein (2002). Islam in Asia: changing political realities. Transaction Publishers. p. 191. ISBN 978-0-7658-0769-4.
  14. "Preventing Extremism in Fragile States: A New Approach, Final Report of the Task Force on Extremism in Fragile States". United States Institute of Peace. February 2019. Archived from the original on 5 August 2022. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Izutsu, Toshihiko (2006) [1965]. "The Infidel (Kāfir): The Khārijites and the origin of the problem". The Concept of Belief in Islamic Theology: A Semantic Analysis of Imān and Islām. Tokyo: Keio Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies at Keio University. pp. 1–20. ISBN 983-9154-70-2. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 26 October 2021.
  16. Khan, Sheema (12 May 2018). "Another battle with Islam's 'true believers'". The Globe and Mail. The Globe and Mail Opinion. Archived from the original on 19 January 2016. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
  17. Hasan, Usama (2012). "The Balance of Islam in Challenging Extremism" (PDF). Quiliam Foundation. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 August 2014. Retrieved 17 November 2015.
  18. 1 2 3 Brown, Daniel (2017). A New Introduction to Islam (3rd ed.). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 163–169. ISBN 9781118953464.
  19. Evstatiev, Simeon (2016). "8: The Qāḍīzādeli Movement and the Revival of takfīr in the Ottoman Age". Accusations of Unbelief in Islam. Brill. pp. 213–14. doi:10.1163/9789004307834_010. ISBN 978-9004307834. Archived from the original on 19 March 2022. Retrieved 29 August 2021.
  20. Cook, Michael (2003). Forbidding Wrong in Islam: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press. p. 91.
  21. Naylor, Phillip (15 January 2015). North Africa Revised. University of Texas Press. ISBN 9780292761926. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 5 December 2015.
  22. Esposito, John (2004). The Oxford Dictionary of Islam. Oxford University Press. p. 275. ISBN 9780195125597. Retrieved 5 December 2015.
  23. 1 2 3 4 "Salafism: Politics and the puritanical". The Economist. 27 June 2015. Archived from the original on 28 June 2015. Retrieved 29 June 2015.
  24. 1 2 Meleagrou-Hitchens, Alexander; Hughes, Seamus; Clifford, Bennett (2021). "The Ideologues". Homegrown: ISIS in America (1st ed.). London and New York City: I.B. Tauris. pp. 111–148. ISBN 978-1-7883-1485-5. Archived from the original on 11 January 2023. Retrieved 5 February 2022.
  25. Marc Sageman (21 September 2011). Understanding Terror Networks. University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 61–. ISBN 978-0-8122-0679-1.
  26. Vincenzo Oliveti (January 2002). Terror's Source: The Ideology of Wahhabi-Salafism and Its Consequences. Amadeus Books. ISBN 978-0-9543729-0-3.
  27. 1 2 3 4 5 Peskes, Esther (2012) [1993]. "Wahhabis". In Bearman, P. J.; Bianquis, Th.; Bosworth, C. E.; van Donzel, E. J.; Heinrichs, W. P. (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Leiden: Brill Publishers. doi:10.1163/1877-5888_rpp_SIM_224015. ISBN 978-9004161214.
  28. 1 2 Bokhari, Kamran; Senzai, Farid, eds. (2013). "Conditionalist Islamists: The Case of the Salafis". Political Islam in the Age of Democratization. New York City: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 81–100. doi:10.1057/9781137313492_5. ISBN 978-1-137-31349-2.
  29. Ágoston, Gábor; Masters, Bruce, eds. (2009). "Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, Muhammad". Archived copy. Encyclopedia of the Ottoman Empire. New York City: Facts On File. pp. 260–261. ISBN 978-0816062591. LCCN 2008020716. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 5 February 2022.{{cite encyclopedia}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  30. 1 2 Wagemakers, Joas (2021). "Part 3: Fundamentalisms and Extremists – The Citadel of Salafism". In Cusack, Carole M.; Upal, M. Afzal (eds.). Handbook of Islamic Sects and Movements. Brill Handbooks on Contemporary Religion. Vol. 21. Leiden and Boston: Brill Publishers. pp. 333–347. doi:10.1163/9789004435544_019. ISBN 978-90-04-43554-4. ISSN 1874-6691.
  31. 1 2 3 4 Laoust, H. (2012) [1993]. "Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhāb". In Bearman, P. J.; Bianquis, Th.; Bosworth, C. E.; van Donzel, E. J.; Heinrichs, W. P. (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam (2nd ed.). Leiden: Brill Publishers. doi:10.1163/1573-3912_islam_SIM_3033. ISBN 978-90-04-16121-4.
  32. 1 2 3 4 5 Haykel, Bernard (2013). "Ibn ‛Abd al-Wahhab, Muhammad (1703–92)". In Böwering, Gerhard; Crone, Patricia; Kadi, Wadad; Mirza, Mahan; Stewart, Devin J.; Zaman, Muhammad Qasim (eds.). The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. pp. 231–232. ISBN 978-0-691-13484-0. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  33. 1 2 3 4 Esposito, John L., ed. (2004). "Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, Muhammad (d. 1791)". The Oxford Dictionary of Islam. New York City: Oxford University Press. p. 123. ISBN 0-19-512559-2. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
  34. 1 2 3 4 "Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, Muhammad – Oxford Islamic Studies Online". oxfordislamicstudies.com. Oxford University Press. 2020. Archived from the original on 12 July 2016. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  35. 1 2 3 Musa, Mohd Faizal (2018). "The Riyal and Ringgit of Petro-Islam: Investing Salafism in Education". In Saat, Norshahril (ed.). Islam in Southeast Asia: Negotiating Modernity. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing. pp. 63–88. doi:10.1355/9789814818001-006. ISBN 9789814818001. S2CID 159438333.
  36. Hasan, Noorhaidi (2010). "The Failure of the Wahhabi Campaign: Transnational Islam and the Salafi madrasa in post-9/11 Indonesia". South East Asia Research. 18 (4). Taylor & Francis on behalf of the SOAS University of London: 675–705. doi:10.5367/sear.2010.0015. ISSN 2043-6874. JSTOR 23750964. S2CID 147114018.
  37. Inge, Anabel (5 October 2016). "6 common misconceptions about Salafi Muslims in the West". OUPblog. Archived from the original on 4 November 2021. Retrieved 20 August 2021.
  38. Kepel, Gilles (2003). Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam. New York City: I.B. Tauris. pp. 61–62. ISBN 9781845112578. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 5 February 2022.
  39. 1 2 "Terrorism: Growing Wahhabi Influence in the United States". www.govinfo.gov. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Publishing Office. 26 June 2003. Archived from the original on 15 December 2018. Retrieved 26 June 2021. Nearly 22 months have passed since the atrocity of 11 September. Since then, many questions have been asked about the role in that day's terrible events and in other challenges we face in the war against terror of Saudi Arabia and its official sect, a separatist, exclusionary and violent form of Islam known as Wahhabism. It is widely recognized that all of the 19 suicide pilots were Wahhabi followers. In addition, 15 of the 19 were Saudi subjects. Journalists and experts, as well as spokespeople of the world, have said that Wahhabism is the source of the overwhelming majority of terrorist atrocities in today's world, from Morocco to Indonesia, via Israel, Saudi Arabia, Chechnya. In addition, Saudi media sources have identified Wahhabi agents from Saudi Arabia as being responsible for terrorist attacks on U.S. troops in Iraq. The Washington Post has confirmed Wahhabi involvement in attacks against U.S. forces in Fallujah. To examine the role of Wahhabism and terrorism is not to label all Muslims as extremists. Indeed, I want to make this point very, very clear. It is the exact opposite. Analyzing Wahhabism means identifying the extreme element that, although enjoying immense political and financial resources, thanks to support by a sector of the Saudi state, seeks to globally hijack Islam [...] The problem we are looking at today is the State-sponsored doctrine and funding of an extremist ideology that provides the recruiting grounds, support infrastructure and monetary life blood of today's international terrorists. The extremist ideology is Wahhabism, a major force behind terrorist groups, like al Qaeda, a group that, according to the FBI, and I am quoting, is the "number one terrorist threat to the U.S. today".
  40. Haider, Murtaza (22 July 2013). "European Parliament identifies Wahabi and Salafi roots of global terrorism". Dawn. Pakistan. Archived from the original on 26 December 2018. Retrieved 3 August 2014.
  41. "Wahhābī (Islamic movement)". Encyclopædia Britannica. Edinburgh: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. 9 June 2020. Archived from the original on 26 June 2020. Retrieved 1 July 2020. Because Wahhābism prohibits the veneration of shrines, tombs, and sacred objects, many sites associated with the early history of Islam, such as the homes and graves of companions of Muhammad, were demolished under Saudi rule. Preservationists have estimated that as many as 95 percent of the historic sites around Mecca and Medina have been razed.
  42. Rabasa, Angel; Benard, Cheryl (2004). "The Middle East: Cradle of the Muslim World". The Muslim World After 9/11. Rand Corporation. p. 103, note 60. ISBN 0-8330-3712-9.
  43. Howden, Daniel (6 August 2005). "The destruction of Mecca: Saudi hardliners are wiping out their own heritage". The Independent. Archived from the original on 20 October 2011. Retrieved 21 December 2009.
  44. Finn, Helena Kane (8 October 2002). "Cultural Terrorism and Wahhabi Islam". Council on Foreign Relations. Archived from the original on 4 September 2014. Retrieved 5 August 2014. It is the undisputed case that the Taliban justification for this travesty [the destruction of the Buddha statues at Bamiyan] can be traced to the Wahhabi indoctrination program prevalent in the Afghan refugee camps and Saudi-funded Islamic schools (madrasas) in Pakistan that produced the Taliban. ...In Saudi Arabia itself, the destruction has focused on the architectural heritage of Islam's two holiest cities, Mecca and Medina, where Wahhabi religious foundations, with state support, have systematically demolished centuries-old mosques and mausolea, as well as hundreds of traditional Hijazi mansions and palaces.
  45. 1 2 Gallagher, Eugene V.; Willsky-Ciollo, Lydia, eds. (2021). "Al-Qaeda". New Religions: Emerging Faiths and Religious Cultures in the Modern World. Vol. 1. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. pp. 13–15. ISBN 978-1-4408-6235-9. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 31 October 2021.
  46. 1 2 Aydınlı, Ersel (2018) [2016]. "The Jihadists pre-9/11". Violent Non-State Actors: From Anarchists to Jihadists. Routledge Studies on Challenges, Crises, and Dissent in World Politics (1st ed.). London and New York City: Routledge. pp. 65–109. ISBN 978-1-315-56139-4. LCCN 2015050373. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 31 October 2021.
  47. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Moussalli, Ahmad S. (2012). "Sayyid Qutb: Founder of Radical Islamic Political Ideology". In Akbarzadeh, Shahram (ed.). Routledge Handbook of Political Islam (1st ed.). London and New York City: Routledge. pp. 9–26. ISBN 9781138577824. LCCN 2011025970. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 26 October 2021.
  48. Cook, David (2015). Understanding Jihad. University of California Press. p. 93. ISBN 9780520287327.
  49. 1 2 Polk, William R. (2018). "The Philosopher of the Muslim Revolt, Sayyid Qutb". Crusade and Jihad: The Thousand-Year War Between the Muslim World and the Global North. The Henry L. Stimson Lectures Series. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. pp. 370–380. doi:10.2307/j.ctv1bvnfdq.40. ISBN 978-0-300-22290-6. JSTOR j.ctv1bvnfdq.40. LCCN 2017942543. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 31 October 2021.
  50. Lawrence Wright (2006). "2". The Looming Tower. Knopf. ISBN 0-375-41486-X.
  51. Baele, Stephane J. (October 2019). Giles, Howard (ed.). "Conspiratorial Narratives in Violent Political Actors' Language" (PDF). Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 38 (5–6). SAGE Publications: 706–734. doi:10.1177/0261927X19868494. hdl:10871/37355. ISSN 1552-6526. S2CID 195448888. Archived from the original on 3 January 2022. Retrieved 3 practical 2022. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
  52. Scott Shane; Souad Mekhennet & Robert F. Worth (8 May 2010). "Imam's Path From Condemning Terror to Preaching Jihad". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 11 May 2010. Retrieved 13 May 2010.
  53. Robert Irwin, "Is this the man who inspired Bin Laden?" Archived 9 December 2022 at the Wayback Machine The Guardian (1 November 2001).
  54. Paul Berman, "The Philosopher of Islamic Terror" Archived 9 December 2022 at the Wayback Machine, New York Times Magazine (23 March 2003).
  55. "Out of the Shadows: Getting ahead of prisoner radicalization" (PDF). PBS. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 April 2013. Retrieved 3 January 2022.
  56. Trevor Stanley. "The Evolution of Al-Qaeda: Osama bin Laden and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi". Archived from the original on 3 January 2022. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
  57. Qutbism: An Ideology of Islamic-Fascism Archived 9 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine by Dale C. Eikmeier. From Parameters, Spring 2007, pp. 85–98.
  58. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cook, David (2015) [2005]. "Radical Islam and Contemporary Jihad Theory". Understanding Jihad (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 102–110. ISBN 9780520287327. JSTOR 10.1525/j.ctv1xxt55.10. LCCN 2015010201. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 26 October 2021.
  59. Gibril Haddad, "Quietism and End-Time Reclusion in the Qurʾān and Hadith: Al-Nābulusī and His Book Takmīl Al-Nuʿūt within the ʿuzla Genre", Islamic Sciences 15, no. 2 (2017): pp. 108–109)
  60. Bill Roggio (26 April 2011). "How many al Qaeda operatives are now left in Afghanistan? – Threat Matrix". Longwarjournal.org. Archived from the original on 6 July 2014. Retrieved 10 April 2014.
  61. "Al Qaeda in Afghanistan Is Attempting A Comeback". HuffPost. 21 October 2012. Archived from the original on 23 October 2012. Retrieved 10 April 2014.
  62. "Death toll of Al Qaeda attacks: more than 4,400 lives". npsglobal.org. Archived from the original on 12 January 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2015.
  63. Kepel, Gilles (2002). Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam. Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674008779. Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam.
  64. "Profile: Al-Qaeda in North Africa". BBC. 17 January 2013. Archived from the original on 12 July 2015. Retrieved 2 July 2015.
  65. Browning, Noah; Ghobari, Mohammed (16 June 2015). "Al Qaeda in Yemen says leader killed in U.S. bombing". Reuters. Retrieved 16 June 2015.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  66. 1 2 Kendall, Elisabeth (8 September 2021). Cruickshank, Paul; Hummel, Kristina (eds.). "Twenty Years After 9/11: The Jihadi Threat in the Arabian Peninsula" (PDF). CTC Sentinel. 14 (7). West Point, New York: Combating Terrorism Center: 63–75. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 September 2021. Retrieved 10 November 2021.
  67. "Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) – Council on Foreign Relations". Cfr.org. Archived from the original on 15 May 2017. Retrieved 4 June 2012.
  68. "The al-Qaeda Brand Died Last Week". Forbes. 6 September 2011. Archived from the original on 16 February 2015. Retrieved 7 September 2011.
  69. Smith-Spark, Laura (14 January 2015). "What is al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula?". CNN. Archived from the original on 25 March 2021. Retrieved 23 April 2015.
  70. Sanger, David E.; Mazzetti, Mark (30 June 2010). "New Estimate of Strength of Al Qaeda Is Offered". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  71. "Al Qaeda finds base in India, Modi is on its radar". The Sunday Guardian. 29 March 2014. Archived from the original on 30 March 2016. Retrieved 5 June 2014.
  72. 1 2 3 4 Bacon, Tricia; Warner, Jason (8 September 2021). Cruickshank, Paul; Hummel, Kristina (eds.). "Twenty Years After 9/11: The Threat in Africa—The New Epicenter of Global Jihadi Terror" (PDF). CTC Sentinel. 14 (7). West Point, New York: Combating Terrorism Center: 76–92. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 September 2021. Retrieved 10 November 2021.
  73. "Are Boko Haram Worse Than ISIS?". Conflict News. Archived from the original on 17 March 2015.
  74. "Global Terrorism Index 2014" (PDF). Institute for Economics and Peace. p. 53. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 February 2015. Retrieved 23 February 2015.
  75. "Al-Qaeda map: Isis, Boko Haram and other affiliates' strongholds across Africa and Asia". 12 June 2014. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2014.
  76. Prothero, Mitchell (4 February 2022). "ISIS Leader Killed in US Raid Was a SNITCH Who Orchestrated the Yazidi Genocide". VICE News. New York City. Archived from the original on 5 February 2022. Retrieved 6 February 2022.
  77. "Islamic state confirms death of its leader, names new chief". Reuters. 10 March 2022. Archived from the original on 10 March 2022. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
  78. "Isis ranks dwindle to 15,000 amid 'retreat on all fronts', claims Pentagon". The Guardian. 11 August 2016. Archived from the original on 29 November 2020. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  79. "45,000 Islamic State fighters taken off battlefields". News.com.au. 11 August 2016. Archived from the original on 15 March 2021. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  80. Glum, Julia (10 August 2016). "How Many People Has ISIS Killed? Terrorist Attacks Linked To Islamic State Have Caused 33,000 Deaths: Report". International Business Times. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 27 October 2016.
  81. Fouad al-Ibrahim (22 August 2014). "Why ISIS is a threat to Saudi Arabia: Wahhabism's deferred promise". Al Akhbar English. Archived from the original on 24 August 2014.
  82. Bennett-Jones, Owen (25 April 2014). "Pakistan army eyes Taliban talks with unease". BBC News. Archived from the original on 4 July 2014. Retrieved 4 July 2014.
  83. "Field Listing :: Terrorist groups – foreign based – The World Factbook – Central Intelligence Agency". Central Intelligence Agency. Archived from the original on 11 January 2019. Retrieved 16 September 2019.
  84. Chomsky, Noam; Vltchek, Andre (2013). On Western Terrorism: From Hiroshima to Drone Warfare. Pluto Press. p. 115. ISBN 978-1-84964-937-7.
  85. Chomsky, Noam; Wainwright, Joel; Nir, Oded (2018). ""There Are Always Grounds for Seeking a World That Is More Free and More Just": An Interview with Noam Chomsky on Israel, Palestine, and Zionism". Rethinking Marxism. 30 (3): 357. doi:10.1080/08935696.2018.1525966. S2CID 149553671.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
  • Quotations related to Islamic extremism at Wikiquote