Talk:Islamic Association of China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

It is requested that a logo be included in this article to improve its quality.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

Latest comment: 19 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

What exactly is the subject of the dispute? I'm a bit surprised to see that the {{disputed}} tag was added by User:Kaihsu, who was the only person to have edited the article up to that point. --Saforrest 17:52, 4 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Maybe because he thinks its biased and doesn't talk about how the CPIA is a front for the government, an example of repression/control, etc. John Smith's 17:39, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the Disputed tag. If it is truly disputed, someone should provide actual references to support the dispute (unlike throwing claims out as John Smith above does...) Beetle B. 22:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply