User talk:Day Creature

Hello

Hello! Just a quick update, I have already submitted an edit request at Talk:Mahathir Mohamad regarding some wording that I believe may need clarification or revision. Feel free to have a look if you're interested. Thank you for your time and for your contributions to the article! ~2026-36417-63 (talk) 06:58, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Just responded to you there. Out of curiosity, are you using any AI assistance to write your posts? Day Creature (talk) 07:02, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

no, thank you😁 ~2026-36417-63 (talk) 07:21, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Company page edit - LLM

Hi Day Creature

Thanks a lot for taking a look at the suggested edits for Framestore wiki page. There is a team of us working on the updates so the copy is generated by team members - hence the COI note - but we have used AI to help edit finesse the copy so it's easier to read/consistent. We are trying to follow the rules, but would be grateful to know what you would suggest in order for us to better reflect what the company does, and milestones.

Thank you Vfxinfilm (talk) 08:21, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

AI-generated talk page posts and edit requests are not allowed, per WP:AITALK. Your comment also suggests that you may be sharing a Wikipedia account, which is likewise not allowed per WP:NOSHARE. Going forward, you should ensure that any edit requests you make are written entirely yourself without any AI assistance, and that only one individual uses your Wikipedia account and does not share it or its password with anyone else. Day Creature (talk) 18:39, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

thank you. The Wikipedia account is my own, I'm not sharing it, me and my team mates are working together in an office to look at the company page, I then paste all our suggested edits in the talk page. I will start again! ~2026-38605-67 (talk) 20:36, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

LLM edit requests question

Heyo, I've been stumbling across edit requests denied by you for LLM usage, and I just wanted to ask... what about Talk:Universal Avenue#Edit request: update Varvet status after 2018 made you think it was AI generated? Just curious, I want to improve my detection skills aand stuff pattersonuwu ^njz (talk) 17:23, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Basically, the whole "conflict of interest disclosure" thing at the bottom. Use of a boldface heading like that followed by a colon is generally indicative of AI. Same with the "I am requesting a change here instead of editing the article directly." LLM-generated edit requests very commonly have identical or similar language, and it's the kind of negative parallelism ("it's not X, it's Y") that LLMs use all the time. Finally, the "If there are concerns, I am happy to do X" language at the end. LLMs love to insert these canned phrases at the end of edit requests; they always write them like they're emailing their boss. The use of Template:request edit rather than Template:edit COI is also a huge tell for me, as the LLMs are continually directing people to use this incorrect template. Other things you can look for that weren't in that specific request: general overuse of boldface and em dashes, use of Markdown and other Wikitext formatting errors, and references to "neutral", "independent" or "uninvolved" editors.

One of these days maybe I'll write up something like WP:AISIGNS but specifically for edit requests, as I think I've gotten pretty experienced at spotting them at this point. It helps to always ask yourself: would a human being who is making their 1st edit to Wikipedia really write something like this? Day Creature (talk) 17:48, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Edit request: Egypt article

Hello Day Creature,

Thank you very much for reviewing the edit request on Talk: Egypt. I would appreciate it if you could review the edit request for the lead paragraph. Thank you. Pyramidslover (talk) 19:58, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Responded to you there. Day Creature (talk) 17:08, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I’ve adjusted accordingly. Thanks to re-check. Thank you Pyramidslover (talk) 18:33, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Replied to you there. Day Creature (talk) 17:53, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Thanks for taking care of many edit requests.Astropulse (talk) 07:27, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

RE: James Rodriguez edit request

Hi Day Creature,

I wrote the edit request on James Rodriguez, and even made an account as I thought aspects of the base article seemed to have been pretty egregiously edited.

I did write and structure that thing myself, I had hoped for clarity and with as exhaustive reasoning as I was willing to spend time on, this is how I reason and structure if left to my own devices, if its setting off automatic issues, I don't understand why or if I should rework the request.

Sorry if this is unwelcome but to stand on my soapbox for a second, I do have real issues with the article in its current Ver.

I believe the base article has been the subject of what I guess would be termed fan editing, that sentence I took particular umbrage with is very under supported for the scale of the claim, particularly given the 'source behind the source' and feels like it is trying to establish a consensus where there is none.

I have actually been looking at the intro further, and there is also issue with:

- "Utilizing statistical models to evaluate performance data, the study identified Rodríguez as the most efficient midfielder with the highest average of goals and assists per match in the history of Real Madrid" -> Neither citation supports the second part of that sentence, that was not part of the purview of the study. Should be properly cited or removed.

- "At the international level, he entered the top ten list of all-time assist providers in men's international football history, surpassing Brazil's Pelé" -> contradicts the actual all-time list on wikipedia, Pele has 47 assists as the accepted total on here. Should be removed.

Sorry for the wall of text and sorry if this is not the place to be doing this.

Dantes DantesinNantes (talk) 11:45, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

If there are issues with the article the best place to discuss them is on the article talk page. Day Creature (talk) 04:08, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Requesting edite on Kambampati Nachiketa page

Hi Day Creature

i saw your comments on edit request in Kambampati Nachiketa ,where members just mentioned required changes to the page ,but they did provide any citation , so i created another request for edite with all information and citation proof with link .

presently the Person " Kambampati Nachiketa " is in trending due to Netflix Documentary .

Lot of people are reading about him ,so they should not get wrong information about it .

Thank you for supporting wiki contribution WC MAX007 (talk) 14:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

I've responded to you at Talk:Kambampati Nachiketa. Day Creature (talk) 18:30, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Sanadhya Brahmin

Can you respond to edit request on Sanadhya Brahmin please. ~2026-44275-44 (talk) 00:52, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, I won't be able to review it as I don't have access to the sources and am not familiar enough with the subject matter. Also, I noticed that the Google Books links are incorrect. Day Creature (talk) 06:22, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

I fixed the Google books links, you can check it now. ~2026-44275-44 (talk) 07:02, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing the links. I'm going to reopen your edit request so someone else can take a look, as I'm not familiar enough with the subject to evaluate it properly. Day Creature (talk) 19:05, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Clarification regarding LLM warning

Hi Day Creature. I wanted to clarify that I wrote the substance of the comment myself. English is my second language, and I sometimes use Google Translate to translate or improve the English of comments I have already written. I understand the concern about LLM-generated discussion comments, but machine translation should not be mistaken for having an LLM generate the argument or comment for me. Thanks. ~~~~ Oswald Quinsley (talk) 22:33, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Responded at your talk, let's keep the discussion there. Day Creature (talk) 07:39, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

Article: Iterated function system

Dear Day Creature,

I replied to your recent message regarding the Wikipedia article about Iterated Function Systems (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iterated_function_system), as well as to your comment on the talk page of the account I am using. Thank you for your time. Cedricbonhomme (talk) 22:32, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

Organized Labour September Editing Event

You're invited to join the Organized Labour community editing event, a cross-wiki event taking place throughout September 2026!

The campaign brings together Wikimedians interested in improving coverage of organised labour, workers, trade unions, and labour history. We have confirmed collaborations with Wikipedia language editions in English, Dutch, Persian, Serbo-Croatian and French. If you want to add other language editions or other wiki projects you are strongly encouraged to do so! This event spans geography and languages!

This is a one-time invitation. You're receiving it because you previously signed a petition related to Wiki Workers United (WWU). We hope you'll join us!

Regards ~ Shushugah (talk) 14:19, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

please help me

@Day Creature hi, could you please help me? user Imroxmx has repeatedly been making unsupported changes to the Mariam-uz-Zamani, Ruqaiya Sultan Begum, and Padshah Begum articles without providing reliable references. some of the claims have no clear historical basis. i've already corrected the edits and left a note on their talk page, but the same changes keep being added back. i can't reverted edit, so i have to fix everything manually each time, which is taking a lot of time. could you please warn them about this? thanks Furogh e Lotf (talk) 07:05, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

I don't believe I've edited any of those articles before. I noticed that you posted this on several other editors' talk pages, so please make sure you've read and understood our policy on canvassing. Day Creature (talk) 15:09, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

you came up because you previously commented on or gave advice on my edit request on the Akbar talk page, which was related to the articles I mentioned. i thought you might be able to help since your user page "I help out with small fixes and reverting vandalism..." as i mentioned, i can't revert edits yet, so i was simply asking for some help with that. sorry if i got this wrong, and honestly, i'm not trying to start an argument or anything. that's all. thankfully, another editor has now reverted them. Furogh e Lotf (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery by Paramount Skydance".The discussion is about the topic Proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery by Paramount Skydance.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

—~2026-44633-54 (talk) 10:59, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

USING LLM

Hello there , I'm not using LLM for my request , English in not my first language maybe this is what made you think I used llm , please review the request I made about Avicenna image , since this image being used right now is really generic and being used to all Arab/Muslim scientists , I've suggested adding the image that being tagged as most valuable image in wiki common about Avicenna scope , please help in this manner 004bvan (talk) 16:15, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

Responded to you at Talk:Avicenna. Day Creature (talk) 16:30, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

Talk page: Hayden Panettiere - Top page edit request on 28 August 2026

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hayden_Panettiere#Top_page_edit_request_on_28_August_2026 ~2026-47803-39 (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

Responded to you there. In the future, be sure to include an edit request template so your request will be seen by other editors (see WP:ER for instructions). Day Creature (talk) 21:06, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

How do I create an edit request template? ~2026-48259-92 (talk) 21:02, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

The link in my previous reply has instructions. Day Creature (talk) 20:38, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

You're right. While I Love You, Beth Cooper was a milestone that helped her transition into adult "leading lady" status, neither it nor Tiger Cruise are universally considered Hayden Panettiere's most significant or career-defining roles. How These Two Films Fit Into Her Career - Tiger Cruise: While it remains a nostalgic favorite for fans who grew up watching her, it was a made-for-television film rather than a major cinematic release, making it a stepping stone rather than a definitive pinnacle of her career. I Love You, Beth Cooper: This teen comedy marked her first major studio leading role in cinema. It highlighted her comedic timing and cemented her "popular cheerleader" archetype. However, the film itself received mixed critical reviews and was not a major box-office hit, keeping it from being ranked among her absolute best work. See Semi-protected edit request on 6 September 2026. ~2026-48488-91 (talk) 15:42, 7 September 2026 (UTC)