User talk:Eastiak shoron

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Eastiak_shoron reported by User:Aaaas216& (Result: ). Thank you. Aaaas216& (talk) 21:01, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Eastiak shoron, just notifying you that like social groups of South Asia, anything related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, including US-Iran issues such as the current strikes, are limited to extended-confirmed editors. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 08:28, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Udvash moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Udvash. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no indication of notability of the subject, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement, it appears to consists of machine-generated text and it has too many errors of formatting. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:10, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Udvash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Udvash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Udvash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:11, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Bangladeshi criminals, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Appellate Division, Pilkhana and International Crimes Tribunal were added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Social Business Day moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Social Business Day. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ‑‑gurkubondinn 10:11, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Manual of Style

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Syed Abdullah Mohammed Taher, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:53, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at M. A. Wazed Miah. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:37, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

This is your final warning. Simply deleting the notices placed on your talk page does not mean they go away. It shows you have read them and are choosing to ignore them. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:38, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Sorry but about the M. A. Wazed Mia page i don’t think i have disrupted the page… their was a warning showing on the preview page that education and alma matter should be merged into one and i just did that. Eastiak shoron (talk) 11:09, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

That is not what your edit did. You gave been warned over and over again. Each time you simply delete the warning. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:55, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

I acknowledged every time and have avoided those mistakes.Eastiak shoron (talk) 09:31, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

You have NOT avoided such mistakes, or we wouldn't be here... Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:45, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sunidhi Nayak

The article Sunidhi Nayak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The artist is not yet notable. The sources only talk about her marriage with Arnob and her participation in Coke Studio Bangla. The Rockstar media coverages are regular newspaper coverages for film promotion. Nothing about her.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. — Meghmollar2017 (UTC) — 19:24, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tiyasha Lepcha, a link pointing to the disambiguation page SVF was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Rifat Rashid for merging

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rifat Rashid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be merged.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rifat Rashid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Wikipicked (talk) 10:08, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Udvash

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Udvash requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications is prohibited on Wikipedia. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:22, 9 August 2026 (UTC)