User talk:Favre1fan93
Add topic
This may change in the future, but for the foreseeable future I anticipate only being able to check in every now and then.
Welcome to my Talk Page! If you are leaving a note, please remember to be civil and not to include any personal attacks. Also, please remember to sign your message. Also, I reserve the right to alter or delete any and all submissions. This talk page is automatically archived, so if you don't see your thread anymore, please start a new one. Thanks! |
|
Box office
[edit]Hi, I wanted to ask about the updated box office figures for Brand New Day. I would have updated the figures myself today, but I'm still learning what to add and how to do it, and I don't want to rush into it. My question is: given the new information released today, should we simply adjust the Sunday figures to reflect Monday's numbers, or should we add a separate explanation for the data of the earnings posted today? Thanks in advance—best regards. Marco camino 10 (talk) 21:31, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) The Sunday numbers were just estimates, so generally we just replace them with the actual numbers. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:16, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Ghostarchive
[edit]Are you able to submit links for archival here? Lately I've not been able to as it keeps saying error 404. Also questioning Adamstom.97 as it might work in different countries. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:28, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- I've had issues with it lately. - adamstom97 (talk) 16:33, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- I don't use Ghostarchive too often myself (only when Wayback can't capture), but I haven't had too many issues. Is there a url from a site (not necessarily an article you've already archived) that was giving you trouble that I could check? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:08, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Someone is still able to archive refs, but I have no idea how. Kailash29792 (talk) 23:34, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Kailash29792: I tried taking this tweet from that same user, and got an archive error. I did have to do a Captcha step before I got the error, which was new for me. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:09, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Someone is still able to archive refs, but I have no idea how. Kailash29792 (talk) 23:34, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- I don't use Ghostarchive too often myself (only when Wayback can't capture), but I haven't had too many issues. Is there a url from a site (not necessarily an article you've already archived) that was giving you trouble that I could check? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:08, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
When writing about box office, as MOS:DOMESTIC says, Avoid terminology such as "domestic" and "international", which is used by sites such as Box Office Mojo for box office figures from the United States and Canada, and elsewhere.
TompaDompa (talk) 19:37, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- There isn't any issue with that. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:43, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- You added the text
Brand New Day is the highest-grossing film of 2026 in international territories.
to the Spider-Man: Brand New Day article with this edit. TompaDompa (talk) 19:48, 6 August 2026 (UTC)- Logically, in a paragraph where it is correctly established with
Outside the United States and Canada
, "international" fits because of the previous establishment. I'll adjust it to "other" to reflect the wording used at the start of the section. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
- Logically, in a paragraph where it is correctly established with
- You added the text
Your Swamp Thing deletion of the (line 1) year is wrong
[edit]Your reversion/deletion of the Swamp Thing year in intro is wrong.
Also you said, “year shouldn't be in the first sentence of the lead, covered later more appropriately” https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swamp_Thing_(2019_TV_series)&diff=prev&oldid=1368203727
If you look at almost any series, movie, book, wiki article, it will have year in first or second line. Not the second paragraph. That’s because it’s crucial for a reader to have a clue what the thing is, possibly what century or decade, possibly which version/generation, especially when it’s part of a larger property and when there’s multiple other shows of the same thing, to place it within human history. It’s the single most universal bit in a lead assuming a person got the title correct (and assuming a person wants to understand the subject).
Currently, it’s not covered more appropriately later, because paragraph 2 isn’t early enough for it and the current one is half-irrelevant for a lead. The relevant bits being: A) year B) maybe one sentence about immediate cancellation, because there’s a later section C) the line about reception. If the cancellation and protest effort is important (not necessarily true) then a brief line should be moved to lead. But none of this means that the year should only be in paragraph 2 or that a narration of release of episodes should be in the lead. A cancellation story being in the lead is a bad reason for relegating the year only to paragraph 2.
So I’m curious:
- If I posted a discussion for comment, do you think wikipedia consensus would agree with your deletion and your claim that year doesn’t belong in the first 1-2 lines? Given that that’s in 440,000,000 articles, for good reason?
- Are you aware that there are 3 different Swamp Thing TV series?
- If the original edit summary simply said “added year as basic immediate crucial info in first 1-2 lines” would you have agreed, since it wouldn’t have mentioned a hover-over/rendering/device issue?
- Why would the text not be the place to address a problem of relevant info missing from the text when a person is seeing the first 1-2 lines?
RandomEditor6772314 (talk) 20:58, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Every single CW superhero television series plus those from DC Universe do not have the year in the lead, so since they all follow that formatting, that should be retained for Swamp Thing as well. Your edit summary noted it was because of the pop up page previews, so if those need more disambiguation information shown on there, that's a WP:Page Previews problem, not an article problem. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:58, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
Tech News: 2026-36
[edit]Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Weekly highlight
- A new format for the Community Wishlist is open for feedback. You can read the proposed ideas on Meta. This new process plans to improve how wishes are triaged, voted on, and prioritized in a way that is transparent and balanced across project families and language editions. This consultation is open for two weeks.
Updates for editors
- The latest release of the Wikipedia Android app includes updates to the Saved feature, bringing the app’s saving experience closer to iOS and Web. The update redesigns the Saved tab with an “All articles” view, removes the default “Saved” reading list, renames reading lists to “Collections,” and modernizes the article-saving experience.
- The Reading Lists feature was enabled for all logged-in users on Bengali, Chinese, Czech and Vietnamese Wikipedias on August 25, after several months as a beta feature. Reading Lists will be available to all logged-in users on Arabic, French and Indonesian Wikipedias on September 1, followed by English Wikipedia on September 14, and all other Wikipedia wikis on September 28.
- At the end of the month, some logged-out readers on Bengali, Czech, Persian, English, and Polish Wikipedias using the Minerva skin on mobile will see an updated navigation bar in an A/B test. The test will compare the current navigation bar with a new version designed to make it easier to find information more quickly. The goal is to determine whether these changes encourage readers to return more often. This experiment will not change the experience for logged-in readers and/or editors.
- Editors who maintain redirects, templates, and categories used on redirect pages now have improved ways for finding and curating redirects. Previously, redirects pages could not be searched. Two new search keywords,
onlyredirects:andwithredirects:, now allow redirects to be searched directly and can be combined with existing keywords such asincategory:,intitle:, andinsource:. - The ISBN lookup tools for generating citations were recently not working because of external service problems. Developers are working on solutions.
View all 30 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week. For example, an issue where searching for pages by category using deepcatcould return no results or unrelated results has now been fixed.
Updates for technical contributors
- The domain of URLs for thumbnails is changing from upload.wikimedia.org to thumb.wikimedia.org. The old URLs will continue to work for the foreseeable future but MediaWiki will advertise the new domain instead. URLs to other types of media such as original files, videos and transcodes will still be served from upload.wikimedia.org.
- The Wikimedia Math API is now deprecated. These endpoints will be fully sunset by the end of September 2026. Developers who call these endpoints should transition to alternative math rendering solutions, such as the native MathML or MathJax. Third-party MediaWiki installations that utilize the Math extension for formula rendering are required to upgrade to v1.43+ to avoid disruption of service.
Detailed code updates later this week: MediaWiki
In depth
- Read more about TextMatch in a Diff post titled, Custom edit suggestions for every wiki: How communities are shaping Suggestion Mode with TextMatch.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.