User talk:FunkMonk
Add topic
Your nomination of Mauritius scops owl has passed
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Mauritius scops owl has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 09:05, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Good article nominations RfC
[edit]Hi FunkMonk,
There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.
By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.
Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox(talk|contributions) 16:02, 11 August 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I want to mention that I found two more dinosaur GAs without restorations. One of them is Echinodon, which I put because your reconstruction depicts it getting eaten, and what I was requesting was a proper life restoration of a living individual.
My apologies if this is an issue. â Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-43239-79 (talk) 19:42, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- That sounds fine, it's similar to the Zephyrosaurus situation. FunkMonk (talk) 20:08, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Understood. My problem was, I was describing your reconstruction, which I felt like might have been a little annoying. ~2026-43239-79 (talk) 20:45, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- But yeah, I think a reconstruction of a living Echinodon individual is necessary, given its GA status. ~2026-43239-79 (talk) 20:46, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Understood. My problem was, I was describing your reconstruction, which I felt like might have been a little annoying. ~2026-43239-79 (talk) 20:45, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Aquilops, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add a title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
- https://phys.org/news/2014-12-oldest-horned-dinosaur-species-north.html. Retrieved 27 August 2026.
{{cite web}}: Missing or empty|title=(help) - https://web.archive.org/web/20151008012216/http://dontmesswithdinosaurs.com/?p=1220. Retrieved 27 August 2026.
{{cite news}}: Missing or empty|title=(help)
- https://phys.org/news/2014-12-oldest-horned-dinosaur-species-north.html. Retrieved 27 August 2026.
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:02, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
Ddinodan
[edit]I noticed an edit you made to WP:WikiProject Dinosaurs/Image review/Header where you reverted the addition of a user calling out what they call âpro-Ddinodan biasâ on the image review board, saying that the time stamps are proof of said bias. Your rationale was that your interactions with Ddinodan prove otherwise. Can you tell me where these interactions are? ~2026-47136-40 (talk) 07:06, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
- I didn't mention time stamps, you can look at the countless arguments I've had with him in the archives. FunkMonk (talk) 07:13, 30 August 2026 (UTC)