User talk:Gavetheman555

Replaceable non-free use File:Christopher Masterson in 2008.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Christopher Masterson in 2008.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sophisticatedevening^(talk) 16:56, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Erik Per Sullivan in 2007.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Erik Per Sullivan in 2007.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Small text in signature

I noticed that you added small text formatting to your signature, but omitted the closing </small>. That is not ideal as it causes the small text to continue for the remainder of the page–especially when this happens on AfD subpages that are transcluded to various log pages. It's a relatively minor issue in the grand scheme of things, but I wanted to let you know so that it can be repaired. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:36, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

thanks for letting me know! Gavetheman555 (talk) 02:38, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Pilot MITM.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pilot MITM.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Tbhotch^™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 04:02, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

The My Chemical Romance Barnstar

	The My Chemical Romance Barnstar
	For working on multiple My Chemical Romance articles and helping cover the GA review for Life on the Murder Scene. You didn't have to do all that but I greatly appreciate it. :) λ NegativeMP1 02:29, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you!!!! Gavetheman555 (talk) 09:02, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Submarine (2010 film) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Submarine (2010 film) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 20:07, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Submarine (2010 film) is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Submarine (2010 film) has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 18:27, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Re: The Man Who Sold the World

It looks like your nom accidentally restored (purely due to the bot) a false start review from 2020. It's in the page history, but I blanked it to reset it and take the nom. Ojorojo has been inactive for three years. Viriditas (talk) 02:40, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Please see: User_talk:Zmbro#Talk:The_Man_Who_Sold_the_World_(song)/GA1. Viriditas (talk) 02:55, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

GA1 was closed because the bot opened the old review by accident. Since you aren't the primary author, you will probably want to discuss with User:Zmbro as to whether or not to re-nominate. I apologize for the inconvenience. Viriditas (talk) 11:18, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

I just replied to your comment on Zmbro's talk page, again super sorry for this giant mess I created Gavetheman555 (talk) 11:23, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

You didn't do anything wrong. Zmbro says you should co-nominate after a major copyedit. Viriditas (talk) 19:25, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Submarine (2010 film) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Submarine (2010 film) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 06:26, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Pretty Girl (Clairo song) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Pretty Girl (Clairo song) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 02:05, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Pretty Girl (Clairo song) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Pretty Girl (Clairo song) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 02:45, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Bulletproof Heart (My Chemical Romance song) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Bulletproof Heart (My Chemical Romance song) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:42, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Bulletproof Heart (My Chemical Romance song) is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Bulletproof Heart (My Chemical Romance song) has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:41, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Bulletproof Heart (My Chemical Romance song) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Bulletproof Heart (My Chemical Romance song) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 23:22, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Thank You for the Venom is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Thank You for the Venom is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 19:48, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Why are mixed pronoun usage considered “inconsistent”?

If someone’s correct pronouns are multiple sets of pronouns, the correct way to use those is to mix and switch between them? (Re: Gerard Way Wikipedia page) Jaysbaddecisions (talk) 23:24, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

I did not say they were inconsistent, I was simply sticking to the note that states "This article uses he/him for consistency", given that Way is more referred to as a He rather than a They (he even points out in the tweet that is cited that he prefers he/they instead of they/them). Its a similar thing on articles like Elliot Page and Chella Man. Gavetheman555 (talk) 23:35, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Just because it’s commonly done, doesn’t mean it’s correct (socially or grammatically). Elliot Page is also often misgendered and deadnamed, does that mean his wikipedia page should reflect that? No, because those aren’t his pronouns or name and i’d argue their wikipedia page also should use both he and they pronouns since those are the pronouns he’s stated he uses. Any argument that a certain set/s of pronouns are confusing is a common transphobic piece of propaganda; if it is something that is genuinely confusing, the best way to get used to and understand it, is to be exposed to it. Jaysbaddecisions (talk) 23:39, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your efforts in improving articles. Keep it going! Volten001 ☎ 05:10, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks so much!! :) Gavetheman555 (talk) 11:59, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Pilot (Malcolm in the Middle) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Pilot (Malcolm in the Middle) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RTSthestardust -- RTSthestardust (talk) 20:46, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your work on Pilot (Malcolm in the Middle) RTSthestardust (talk) 20:55, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you!! :) Gavetheman555 (talk) 20:57, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Pilot (Malcolm in the Middle) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Pilot (Malcolm in the Middle) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RTSthestardust -- RTSthestardust (talk) 21:06, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Ulterior Motives (song) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Ulterior Motives (song) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RTSthestardust -- RTSthestardust (talk) 21:48, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Ulterior Motives (song) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Ulterior Motives (song) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RTSthestardust -- RTSthestardust (talk) 23:07, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of The Only Hope for Me Is You has passed

Your good article nomination of the article The Only Hope for Me Is You has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RTSthestardust -- RTSthestardust (talk) 03:48, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Music Barnstar
		This award honors your significant contributions to music, including MCR-related articles and "Ulterior Motives". - RTSthestardust (talk) 03:59, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

Greatly appreciated!! :) Gavetheman555 (talk) 11:26, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Thank You for the Venom has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Thank You for the Venom has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RedShellMomentum -- RedShellMomentum (talk) 01:48, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of A Fever You Can't Sweat Out is under review

Your good article nomination of the article A Fever You Can't Sweat Out is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MFTP Dan -- MFTP Dan (talk) 13:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Hey, I am so sorry to do this to you, but I will need to pause this review for a bit. I wanted to get this done before I left on my trip, but stuff just kept coming up and I was unable to do so. As I implied, I am on a vacation for an extended period. I will return and be able to review at a full capacity on August 5. I have every full intention of finishing this at that time if you're willing to wait, but if you must seek out someone else via second opinion I understand. Again, many apologies, I would rather not just leave this in the dark. mftp dan ^oops 01:52, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

That's completely okay, take all the time you need in the world!! :) Gavetheman555 (talk) 02:06, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

So I have returned from my trip. I had one urgent thing to address - there was a mix up, I suppose you could say, at TFA, that I spent most of my editing time fixing yesterday. I will resume today. mftp dan ^oops 13:48, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pilot (Young Sheldon) has been accepted

Pilot (Young Sheldon), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ScalarFactor (talk) 21:26, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Invitation to share your Good Article review experience

Thankyou Gavetheman555 for completing the GA review for The View (song), it is greatly appreciated. At the moment, we're asking new reviewers to share their experience with the process so we can see how it can be improved and made more welcoming. We'd welcome any thoughts you can share in the survey here. Whonting (talk) 03:01, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Discord

Hey, do you have Discord / are on the Wikimedia Discord? I'm interested in trying to resume work on My Chemical Romance articles, and I think we could coordinate working on some of the remaining MCR subjects together. I'm also planning on expanding into writing about Panic and some other bands soon, which I see that you're interested in also; I'm planning rewrites of "I Write Sins Not Tragedies" and "This Is Gospel" at some point. Of course this is only if you're interested in working together like this by any chance. λ NegativeMP1 17:33, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello there! I apologize for the late response (was out all day yesterday) but I do have Discord! I just joined the Wikimedia one, so it should probably be pretty easy to find my profile since im one of the newest members :) Gavetheman555 (talk) 11:15, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas & Friends: Blue Mountain Mystery has been accepted

Thomas & Friends: Blue Mountain Mystery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:21, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	Really Useful Editor Barnstar
	Thank you for your contributions to Thomas & Friends: Blue Mountain Mystery and other Thomas-related articles! Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 17:22, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks so much!!!! Gavetheman555 (talk) 23:45, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of A Fever You Can't Sweat Out has failed

Your good article nomination of the article A Fever You Can't Sweat Out has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MFTP Dan -- MFTP Dan (talk) 06:41, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Hey, I wanted to reach out and apologize a little bit. After re-reading that review, I didn't like the attitude I had that night. I feel like I came off as condescending at times and consequently slightly uncivil. I was tired, trying to finish an unfinished review that I let go way overdue, and I let the fan in me get offended and cloud my language. I should not have taken that personally. If there's any way you're interested in improving the article, let me know, I'd be happy to give you any help. There was just too much to do for me to reasonably keep that open. mftp dan ^oops 01:34, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for reaching out! I personally didn't take any offense so there's no worry there, but I'm really glad you left this follow-up response. If I'm gonna be honest I was starting to question if that met the criteria or not, and was considering on pulling it till you came along (hence why I left a thank you for the fail edit). I don't have plans to re-nominate that but if you ever wanna clean it up yourself (since I do recall you planned making it a GA in the past) I'll totally let you take the chance! Don't feel pressured because you failed it, I didn't take any offense at all, take care!! :) Gavetheman555 (talk) 01:46, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

I felt bad for not giving more of some help in the right direction and feared that maybe the thanks was a "thanks for ripping me to shreds", but I'm glad everything is good over here. Honestly, what I incorrectly recalled being there, I believed was closer than what I now know is actually present. Past the critical reception expansion and writing, I'm not sure I have quite that much drive in me for a while. The review helped me highlight some things I definitely would do, though, so thank you for bringing that to light, I suppose. It'll be a good reference point for anyone to go off of. mftp dan ^oops 02:56, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Good article nominations RfC

Hi Gavetheman555,

There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.

By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.

Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox^{(talk|contributions)} 16:02, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Submarine (2010 film)

On 13 August 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Submarine (2010 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that, during the production of Submarine, director Richard Ayoade insisted on using a 35 mm camera for filming after nobody on the crew wanted to use it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Submarine (2010 film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Submarine (2010 film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of I Miss You (Blink-182 song) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article I Miss You (Blink-182 song) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RTSthestardust -- RTSthestardust (talk) 19:04, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of I Miss You (Blink-182 song) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article I Miss You (Blink-182 song) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RTSthestardust -- RTSthestardust (talk) 23:04, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

She Said She Said

Hello, Gavetheman555! I'll just tell you that after some changes to the prose, "She Said She Said" will pass the good article nomination without difficulty. And to confirm, you do know that JG66 is the chief author of the article, right? You are eligible to nominate the article, of course, but I don't think it'd be right to claim it your own. DannyRogers800 (talk) 21:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

Hey Danny! I'm aware JG66 is the primary author and I obviously do not wish to take all the credit for mostly their work. I withdrew it because depending on when it would get reviewed, I would fear it would interfere with my real life plans and therefor wouldn't get it completed. If plans change however, and depending on how many stuff needs fixing, I might re-nominate it within the next week / possibly within the next few days. I appreciate you for reaching out :) Gavetheman555 (talk) 22:05, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

Sure, you're welcome! Whenever you feel comfortable, we'll find someone to review it. DannyRogers800 (talk) 22:19, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

Hello again. About the note divulging Fonda's retelling of what happened during the LSD trip.... the source may be poor, but I don't think that really matters. It's a primary source, and if Fonda in fact said those words, they're as good as any reprinting of them on a top Beatles tome. I don't know what you think about this. DannyRogers800 (talk) 11:58, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

Are we sure theres not a better source for it? I don't mind if it gets added back but I would prefer if a timestamp was added. Gavetheman555 (talk) 12:18, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

I'll add the timestamp; I really couldn't find a better source, which makes sense since Fonda uttered that statament in a podcast.... unlikely to be reproduced elsewhere. Also, is the Daily Beast suitable for naming song genres; it's sometimes not recommended as per the Perennial Sources list. DannyRogers800 (talk) 20:43, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

I haven't seen it be used for a genre source before, but it's not outright considered unreliable, it might be a "depending on context" type of thing. You can remove it if you want to but if you find a better source for psychedelic pop id say to replace it with that. Gavetheman555 (talk) 21:04, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Pretty Girl (Clairo song)

On 19 August 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pretty Girl (Clairo song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Clairo did not set out to make a lo-fi song – but her equipment was "pretty shitty"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pretty Girl (Clairo song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Pretty Girl (Clairo song)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:03, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

Promotion of List of songs recorded by My Chemical Romance

Congratulations, Gavetheman555! The list you nominated, List of songs recorded by My Chemical Romance, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 23:25, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Bulletproof Heart (song)

On 27 August 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bulletproof Heart (song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Bulletproof Heart (song)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:48, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Submarine (novel) is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Submarine (novel) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lynch44 -- Lynch44 (talk) 11:29, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Submarine (novel) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Submarine (novel) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lynch44 -- Lynch44 (talk) 00:08, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Dead Poets Society is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Dead Poets Society is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 23:03, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, Gavetheman555. I'm just posting to let you know that List of songs recorded by My Chemical Romance – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for October 19. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 01:19, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Dead Poets Society is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Dead Poets Society has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 03:43, 15 September 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Dead Poets Society has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Dead Poets Society has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 13:43, 15 September 2026 (UTC)