Jump to content

User talk:Ivebeenhacked

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 days ago by Ivebeenhacked in topic Pending changes reviewer granted

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■

Hello, CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahunt (talk) 12:41, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year

[edit]
@PhilKnight: I genuinely appreciate this message of yours. I hope the same for you and thank you for this message. May 2026 go according to plan for you. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 07:16, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I assume you meant 2026? 97104, not 97100! (t•c•r•l) 17:42, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
@User97104: He delivered the message on 31 December 2025 and instead of saying simply "2026", he wrote a template "{{#expr:{{#time:Y}} + 1}}" which basically coded the template to add one year to the current year. Since the current year is 2026, the coded template shows 2027. But when the message was delivered in 2025, it did say 2026. It's complicated, I know, but I did my best explaining. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 01:22, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Is this edit warring?

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Zaptain_United#August_2025

You gave me a edit warning in August, but this editor is still reverting even after I go on the talk page and getting consensus. They called it "imaginary consensus" and have reverted my edits 3 times.


https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philippine_Airlines_Flight_475&action=history Zaptain United (talk) 15:12, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

There was one 1 editor who dropped their opinion. I think more editors dropping their opinion in the discussion would be the next wise step. Instead of pinging every single editors in that discussion, it'd be helpful to notify the relevant WikiProject talk page. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 15:20, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I already posted there and got no response.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aviation#Could_we_change_the_image_for_Philippine_Airlines_Flight_475? Zaptain United (talk) 15:21, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year, Ivebeenhacked!

[edit]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 ☎ 10:56, 2 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Volten001: Thank you for this. I wish you all the same and have a happy 2026 ahead of you. Goodbye. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 18:18, 2 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Most welcome and thanks for them good wishes. Nice time! Volten001 ☎ 02:27, 3 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of N767BA

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on N767BA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Carson5034 (talk) 00:39, 6 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Operation Gang Bust

[edit]
Notice

The article Operation Gang Bust has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hi! I reviewed the page you created yesterday as part of the New Page Patrol, and I'm afraid I don't think the topic is notable - see WP:NOTNEWS, WP:LASTING and WP:BREAKING. I have proposed it be deleted using WP:PROD. If you (or anyone else) disagrees, all you have to do is remove the PROD template and improve the article. If nobody edits it it will be deleted in about a week. If you think this event will have lasting significance and should be in the Wikipedia, could you please read the guidelines I linked above and edit it to show how the event fulfills the criteria? Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia!

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Lijil (talk) 20:02, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Lijil: Thank you for notifying me and for that review and advice. I'll try to save the article once I'm free. Goodbye. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 20:08, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 15 January 2026

[edit]

Can we change the image for Air France 447?

[edit]

This is actually pretty similar to the Pakistan 8303 discussion we had a few weeks back. Not only is Air France KLM Group on the fuselage, but the Air France symbol is on the engines just like the Pakistan 8303 image. Also, on its own it is a sky background image. The 2007 image also has worse lighting and is more blurry with buildings in the background. I think you should just let me change the image just like you let me change the image for Pakistan International Airlines Flight 8303. Zaptain United (talk) 20:22, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I mean you also agree to changing the Pakistan 8303 image when I show you that the previous image was in a previous livery so why not do the same here? They both had livery changes to the engines. Zaptain United (talk) 20:24, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Zaptain United: Not only my reasonings in my edit descriptions, but 2 other editors have reverted the image change in the same article as well. It's best to take it to the talk page rather than here. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 20:26, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
They only reverted me changing the caption to mention the previous livery not the new image. At the time those reverts were happening the 2007 image was in use. Only after those reverts, another user who I had asked to upload the image, change it to the 2009 image. You are the only one to revert the image change so far. Hopefully, you understand this.
TLDR: The image was changed after the reverts of the caption, the reverts were just about the caption.
Can you now let me change the image? I think I have addressed everything in your edit revert. Also, the 2007 image has worse lighting with more sun reflecting on it so there is something with the the previous image. Zaptain United (talk) 20:36, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I misunderstood what they were doing. I'm getting a bit tired of this, do what you want. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 20:39, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Having a symbol put on the engine is not a new livery. Liveries are big changes, and rolled out across fleets with big marketing campaigns. Adding a symbol is not a different livery. Canterbury Tail talk 20:42, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Well, I think I have addressed the issues with them. Stop putting yourself into a conversation that has already concluded and you have conveniently commented after I have reverted their edit and solved this issue. I think you were hoping for this conversation to end up with them disagreeing with me and refusing to let me change the image. Zaptain United (talk) 20:45, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm not agreeing with you, I'm simply tired of talking about the same issue again and again. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 20:47, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Also, for someone who accuses me of stalking, you seem to be following me a lot on wikipedia. Maybe it is because of the sockpuppet allegations, but you have been doing this for a little bit before that. Zaptain United (talk) 20:48, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I think the solution for this issue is to just use the current image. It is in the current livery and it solves the problem of the caption by making it obsolete. Zaptain United (talk) 20:52, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
I have thousands of pages on my watchlist, you keep coming up on many of them. And note the consensus needs to be on the talk page, not some other user's talk page. And amazingly you still don't understand how consensus works, Ivebeenhacked cannot "let" you change things. Canterbury Tail talk 20:55, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Well, they were the only ones to disagree with me and we have had previous discussions on image changes and do you have a lot aviation accident articles on your watchlist because I do in fact like editing all the aircraft accident/incident articles. My ultimate goal is to edit every single one of them and change the caption, short description, or image if needed. But, we are getting off track from the original conversation that has ended. I might discuss this on your talk page. Zaptain United (talk) 21:00, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 January 2026

[edit]

Yom Kippur War

[edit]

Please translate both of the following articles: The Battle of Fort Port Tawfiq and The Battle of El Fardan into English?

All reliable sources in the article. ~2026-91645-8 (talk) 09:05, 11 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'll think about it. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 14:28, 11 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm currently busy with a few other things in and out of Wikipedia so I'll translate those articles once I'm free. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:29, 11 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Take your time Omar-151 A (talk) 19:35, 11 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Ivebeenhacked:?????? ~2026-26146-18 (talk) 20:04, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
To be honest, I forgot about this, so thank you for reminding me. I most likely will translate them on Saturday. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 20:12, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you ~2026-26250-45 (talk) 17:07, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Ivebeenhacked:?????? ~2026-28094-31 (talk) 14:51, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Signature

[edit]

Hey there, thanks for passing Yae Miko for GA. I just wanted to give you a heads up that your signature has a | in it, which can mess up certain templates. I would suggest either swapping it out or replacing it with a {{!}}. Gommeh (talk! sign!) 18:49, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Are you talking about all the comments I've made in the review? Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 18:54, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh, now I see what you're talking about. I was trying to find out what error you were talking about but you've already fixed it. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 18:58, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 17 February 2026

[edit]
  • Disinformation report: Epstein's obsessions
    The sex offender's attempts to whitewash Wikipedia run deeper than we first thought.
  • Crossword: Pop quiz
    Sharpen your pencil. How well do you really know Wikipedia?

Og research bad for your health?

[edit]

I saw a comment on the page 2026 in aviation by you that says that Original Research is bad for your health. Is that true? Just wondering. ~2026-11923-30 (talk) 02:16, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

No, I was just exaggerating. And I was wrong about what actually happened at the end of the day so yeah. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 02:17, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the drive!

[edit]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Ivebeenhacked! I'm glad that you are joining the March 2026 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk) 10:54, 1 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Cielquiparle: Thank you for reminding me. I'll begin very soon. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:20, 1 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 10 March 2026

[edit]
  • Special report: What actually happened during the Wikimedia security incident?
    A horrifying exploit took place, which could have had catastrophic and far-reaching consequences if used maliciously; instead, it seems to have happened by accident and was used for childish vandalism. How did this happen, and what did the script actually do?

Yom Kippur War

[edit]

Hi, user Hohum has enhanced these two images (1 and 2) from this poster. What do you think about using them in this rejected poster after its enhancement, and replacing this specific image from the poster with this one: Here?

Description of the image to be replaced: Syrian soldiers on a Soviet T-62 tank during the invasion of the Golan Heights. Omar-151 A (talk) 11:17, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

I don't like the idea of replacing this image with this one. I think a better image will be needed if the current one isn't suitable, although I don't see anything wrong with the current one. I'll update the collage soon. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:46, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I implemented the change. See how it works. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:59, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
For visual continuity, it would be easy to make the entire collage greyscale. (Hohum @) 18:43, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Ivebeenhacked:All images must be in grayscale to be accepted, like this collage.
@Hohum:What is your opinion on this matter, and can you do it? Nanx12 (talk) 07:51, 14 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Must it? Just to know, can I see that policy or consensus requiring that? Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 23:44, 14 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Since you believe the collage is correct, please publish it in the article. ~2026-16319-31 (talk) 07:02, 15 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
It was tried before but it was reverted. The solution is to gain consensus in the talk page of Yom Kippur War. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 07:06, 15 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

1982 San Andres de Bocay helicopter crash

[edit]

FYI - I just saw after I submitted my draft about the Draft:1982 San Andres de Bocay helicopter crash your page of the same accident via Aviation accident task force/missing articles. From both of these pages I added content to my draft. Feel free to edit or move more content/sources. ~2026-16964-35 (talk) 12:11, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Alright, that's fine. Thank you for notifying me. And well done finding sources. I had a tough time finding some so yeah. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:01, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 March 2026

[edit]

Hello

[edit]

Can you upload all the photos from this site to Wikimedia Commons? ~2026-22048-49 (talk) 14:34, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but you might need to approach someone else. I'm not really good at licensing or recognising Fair Use. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 15:09, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 21 April 2026

[edit]

T.J. Watt

[edit]

Since the official NFL website now had that data listed, and there aren't any currently cited sources that refute it (since Draft Scout was removed as a citation), I figured it would be okay to cite https://www.nfl.com/draft/tracker/2017/rounds/1#30 for the wingspan data. Bringingthewood and ~WikiOriginal-9~ don't think so, despite the official NFL website showing the info. RevMSWIE500 (talk) 22:52, 25 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Am I able to be of any help to fix the current issues with the T.J. Watt page that everyone would approve of to accelerate the GA review process? RevMSWIE500 (talk) 00:48, 26 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yes, not only the nominator but you can also respond the the prompts given by me. I'll respond to the other question later. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 01:04, 26 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

March 2026 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

[edit]

Citation Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to Ivebeenhacked for collecting more than 93.5 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's March 2026 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing over 8362 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer ■ 16:36, 28 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

@DreamRimmer: Thank you for this. I'll certainly do better in the next event. See you then. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 16:42, 28 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

User report

[edit]

There is a toxic editor on accidents and incidents. Could you tell me how to report him? Nagito Komaeda the Second (talk) 07:51, 1 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Nagito Komaeda the Second: First, click this and then scroll down until you see the word "Twinkle" and click the box next to that word and scroll down and click save. You'll activate the Twinkle tool which makes actions like these significantly easier. Next, go the the "toxic editor's" talk page, User:XXXGimliGliderXXX I presume. Somewhere on the top right of the page, you'll see a new button called "TW". Click that and a drop-down list will appear. In that list, click "ARV". The directions after that is given then. I want you to try this and reach back to me. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 13:43, 1 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
They don't have an user page, I can't find the TW button Nagito Komaeda the Second (talk) 22:32, 1 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Nagito Komaeda the Second: Apologies, I completely forgot about this. Unless if you activate Twinkle, the "TW" button willn't appear. And the guy does seem to have a userpage, here. Once again, I'm genuinely sorry for forgetting about this. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 04:51, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

February 2026 GAN Backlog Drive - award

[edit]
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar   
This award is given to Ivebeenhacked for accumulating 7.2 points in the February 2026 GAN Backlog Drive. Your dedicated reviews contributed to the successful reduction of the backlog and helped improve the quality of articles. Here's our token of appreciation. Thank you for your time and efforts! Fade258 (talk) 07:23, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Fade258: Apologies for the late reply. I'm fairly busy with stuff these days. Thank you for this GAN barnstar. I appreciate it. Maybe in the next GAN event, I'll do a better job? Hopefully see you around later. Goodbye. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:34, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Southwest Airlines Flight 1380 is under review

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Southwest Airlines Flight 1380 is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:05, 10 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Southwest Airlines Flight 1380 is on hold

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Southwest Airlines Flight 1380 has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:45, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For taking on the task and seeing it through. Thank you. Bringingthewood (talk) 03:24, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you really much. I genuinely appreciate this. Hopefully see you around later. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 13:57, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
You're most welcome, you deserve it. I'll definitely see you around. Thanks again! John. Bringingthewood (talk) 23:51, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Talk page of editor of Katō Kiyomasa

[edit]

Hi! I noticed that you reverted a user's edit on the page for Katō Kiyomasa. Thank you for this, and for warning them, but they then proceeded to blank their talk page with an offensive comment, seemingly towards you. Not only this, but I suspect they may be using different temporary accounts, intentional or not, since another temporary account made the same edit prior (that I'd reverted myself, hence how I came across all of this).

Because of that, I haven't warned them for the talk page edit yet. Perhaps I should have, but part of me was tempted to instead report it on WP:ANI since I doubt the editor will engage in any civil discussion. That said, I don't know if that's too hasty, and of course I have no solid evidence that the editor is using multiple temporary accounts, so I thought I'd bring it up to you and ask you what you thought the best way forward was. What are your thoughts? Thanks. Squitor!!! (say hi, i won't bite) 14:12, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I didn't even realise he said that to me. I thought he simply blanked the page. If you really suspect if the Temporary Account is using different accounts, then I'd agree bringing it to ANI would be the best way forward. I also agree that if the TA is doing that, he won't engage in civil discussions. May you provide me those other suspected accounts? Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 14:29, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the swift response, and sorry for the delay in my own. Naturally, there was ~2026-29245-60 (the account in question) and I also suspect that ~2026-29047-83 was used by the same person, due to the same non-trivial edit being made within a short period of time, and the non-existence of edits on any other article by the two accounts. Will you be able to take it from here? I'm of course happy to help wherever possible but I'm unfamiliar with the process. Squitor!!! (say hi, i won't bite) 19:32, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello

[edit]

Could you upload the images that I previously uploaded to Commons? Each image has its own specific article, and the image titles indicate this based on the battle—for example, images related to the Battle of Suez, the Battle of the Chinese Farm, and the October War. Please go ahead and upload them to Wikipedia. Nanx12 (talk) 06:05, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 22 May 2026

[edit]
  • Recent research: WikiLambda the Ultimate
    Does Abstract Wikipedia help fight "One ring to rule them all" solutions for knowledge access - or does it implement one itself?
  • Gallery: Earth Day and Mother's Day
    Earth Day was on 22 April, and Mother's Day was on 10 May (in the US and many other countries).

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

[edit]
Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive:

Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

  • On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.
  • Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.

Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Too bad I missed this event. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 14:23, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Aeroperú Flight 772

[edit]

Hi, can you help me to translate this Aeroperú-Flug 772 to an English article?

Thank you very much and hope you reply! Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 09:33, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Tô Ngọc Khang. Sorry for the late reply. For now, I won't be translating that article and I'll be honest why. I simply don't want to. It's as simple as that. But maybe in a few days or maybe a month later, I'll probably translate it. But for now, I won't. Thank you for understanding. See you around. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 14:11, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Southwest Airlines Flight 1380 has failed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Southwest Airlines Flight 1380 has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:05, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Gamal Abdel Nasser

[edit]

Could you please replace the current picture with this one? It’s an official photo taken in 1964. Nanx12 (talk) 21:17, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

A cup of coffee for you!

[edit]
Haven't seen you in a bit, hope all is well =) – LuniZunie(talk) 05:19, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello @LuniZunie. Thank you for caring enough to notice my absence and my welfare. Honestly, I'm having a loss of motivation and interest in editing Wikipedia and I simply have more to do than edit Wikiledia, but hopefully I'll start editing more from today. And I'm sorry for the late response. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 01:16, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Completely understandable, take your time of course, and If you do decided to leave I wish you well =) – LuniZunie(talk) 03:21, 10 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 21 June 2026

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 July 2026

[edit]
  • News and notes: An exclusive club
    Wikipedia Co-Founder Larry Sanger gets a community ban for canvassing.
  • In the media: Battle for a soul – who won?
    Commissars, winners and losers, blocks or bans, a Wiki red card, social engineering on wikis, and Swift action!

July 2026

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Magical Golden Whip. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Southwest Airlines Flight 1380, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page, which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thanks. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 23:05, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please don't template the regulars. I've been on Wikipedia for 3 years, not 3 days. I can help you understand why I made those edits to Southwest Airlines Flight 1380 if you want, but please don't revert me. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 23:09, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Magical Golden Whip: On the very first page of the NTSB final report, it literally says "7H4". That said, 737-700 isn't wrong, but 737-7H4 is more technically correct. You need to revert your change ASAP. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 23:11, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
I stand by my decision adding the 700,, if you would like to take it to the talk page goa head. It appears your version has been reverted several times, so the 700 is standard use on the page. The other type you but has been included in the infobox. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 23:22, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
What makes you stand with your decision? I literally explained to you 7H4 is more accurate. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 23:31, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
700 is the common name for the aircraft. While it is fine in the infobox, the lead should have the 700. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 14:46, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 2 August 2026

[edit]
  • On the bright side: The beautiful game
    2026 Men's FIFA World Cup, Wikimania music, and wikipress.
  • Traffic report: Odyssey and Oyarzabal
    To take you in the sun to (Ithaca), to show you the World Cup, it's the time of the season for editing!

Good article nominations RfC

[edit]

Hi Ivebeenhacked,

There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.

By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.

Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox(talk|contributions) 16:02, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@JacobTheRox: Thank you for the message. I'll see to it, late or not. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 20:06, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Easter egging

[edit]

I was referring to WP:EASTEREGG in the United 175 article. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:47, 21 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 24 August 2026

[edit]
  • On the bright side: The great outdoors
    Blue Angels, Indigenous Peoples' Day, and the Perseids meteor shower.
  • Opinion: Are we embarrassed yet?
    One editor wants to find out more about a Department of Justice investigation of Wikipedia and its editors.
  • Comix: WP:FAOWN
    "Explaining civilly" probably should go both ways...

The Signpost: 16 September 2026

[edit]
  • News and notes: The Balance of Power
    Wikimedia employees unionize, officer departs, The Signpost gains sister on Wiktionary

Unblock

[edit]

Hello @HJ Mitchell. I'm requesting an early unblock as I've taken care of the things I've needed to. Thank you. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 06:34, 23 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Done. Welcome back. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:22, 23 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
(8 days later...) Thank you. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 06:35, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026

[edit]

Hello, you included in your revert And background information like that about the Netanyahu saying something about a potential attack should come AFTER the incident circumstances are explained. Can I ask why you believe warnings before the incident should be placed after the incident, rather than a background section, where background information belongs? Thanks! – Nice4What (talk · contribs) ♥ 06:17, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

I should've been more clear here, so I'm sorry about that. Let me clarify; I didn't mean that as a general rule. What I was concerned about is that adding Netanyahu's warning section was too intricate to be introduced early in the article body. I feel like if we go through the incident section first, explaining the circumstances of the incident, and then we get into Netanyahu's warning, the reader will better understand what happened and why his warning was relevant. So I'm pretty much saying the background detail was way too intricate and putting it after the incident section will make more sense for us since we have been given basic information about the incident first.
Also, do you also disagree with me removing content about UAE-Israel normalisation? Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 06:32, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
And I'm also sorry if I sounded rude in the edit description. I'm not a rude person, I promise. Well, I could be sometimes, but not this time. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 06:34, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your apologies, it means a lot. Typically the lead is what explains the basics of the incident, after which the background section provides the context before the incident (in chronological order). You can see that for almost any other air disaster article. The normalization detail might not be important, but context that flights were ongoing during a three-year war seems worthwhile if reliable sources are included that detail too. – Nice4What (talk · contribs) ♥ 18:00, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

1RR - Flydubai 1073

[edit]

Be careful editing Flydubai Flight 1073. I know you're trying your best to polish the page up, but it's under WP:1RR restrictions. I see a lot of similar undos by you in the history page. Tread carefully, please. -- Veggies (talk) 18:30, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Thank you for the warning. I should talk to them, it's the right idea. Thank you. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 18:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Pending changes reviewer granted

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:07, 3 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Dr vulpes: Thank you so much for accepting. I really appreciate your confidence in me. Hope to see you around once again. Thank you once again. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 20:50, 3 October 2026 (UTC)Reply