User talk:Joshua Chiang (artist)

Welcome!

Hello, Joshua Chiang (artist), and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Joshua Chiang (artist), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Jusdafax (talk) 06:58, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Joshua Chiang (artist)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Joshua Chiang (artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jusdafax (talk) 06:58, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because (your reason here) --Joshua Chiang (artist) (talk) 11:07, 29 May 2025 (UTC) I have revised the content on my user page and removed all promotional content. But my intent was to disclose a COI transparently per Wikipedia guidelines. Do let me know if the revisions are now within the guidelines.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joshua Chiang (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Early life and education is unsourced. Best,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joshua Chiang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 21:13, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Joshua Chiang (artist)! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 21:13, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joshua Chiang (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joshua Chiang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 21:19, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Joshua Chiang

Hello, Joshua Chiang (artist). This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joshua Chiang, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:16, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Joshua Chiang

Hello, Joshua Chiang (artist). This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Joshua Chiang".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:25, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joshua Chiang has been accepted

Joshua Chiang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

grapesurgeon (talk) 05:56, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

Hello, I'm Gnomingstuff. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi Gmoningstuff, I have not made any new edits to the article since I submitted it for publication in April this year. I have extensively reworked the article before submission, ensuring that all citations are from reliable, published sources, as well as adopting a neutral point of view, amongst other requirements. As such, I am not sure which aspect of the article contains 'factually inaccurate statements' or 'fictitious citations'. If there are any, please point them out, and I'll be happy to review them or substantiate them. ~2026-41845-07 (talk) 08:53, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

I am going to assume this IP account is you. That was a template called user warn. It often creates overly general statements. The issue is the prose appears like "AI" (I disagree with this de facto rule) and the sources did not demonstrate that you were notable.

Sorry for the massive delay. 16dvnk (talk) 11:32, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Joshua Chiang (artist)! The thread you created at the Teahouse, COI tag review after prior disclosure — next steps?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Joshua Chiang (artist)! The thread you created at the Teahouse, AI content - which sentences are flagged, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Joshua Chiang for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joshua Chiang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Chiang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Athanelar (talk) 10:26, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Hi. It may be unfortunate to hear that your article would be deleted, and how fast the Teahouse community only focused on the AI part without a practical way forward. I apologize for that extreme anti-AI culture. Next time, please do not use AI for the prose and/or sourcing. It would be appropriate to only make edit requests about the article after you become notable, if at all. Thanks! 16dvnk (talk) 06:07, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

There's something to understand where COI + AI is a very suspicious profile. We had many of these cases before and most of them went south. This is why the feedback was not exactly warm. 16dvnk (talk) 06:12, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Joshua Chiang (artist). I also think you have been treated pretty badly at The Teahouse and will be raising it with the volunteer users. I'm sorry you had such a negative reaction. Wikipedia is currently in a bit of a nexus point when it comes to anything AI-related; the majority of the community see it as an existential threat to the project and treat all AI-assisted text as bad, no matter the reason.

It was unfortunate the article was accepted via AfC by mistake. It was unfortunate you initially used AI to re-write some sections and format your posts. It was unfortunate the community came down on you like a tonne of bricks.

Your artwork is very interesting and I encourage you to continue with it- perhaps someday and uninvolved editor will deem you notable enough for an article to be made. qcne (talk) 10:20, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

Agreed. 16dvnk (talk) 10:22, 31 August 2026 (UTC)