User talk:Noamonsol234

Welcome!

Hi Noamonsol234! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 13:47, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

User:Noamonsol234/sandbox

I'm sympathetic, but you cannot claims something was popular without citing proper secondary sources. I do not understand the incomplete citation in what is now footnote 5. And please see MOS:SECTIONCAPS. Drmies (talk) 13:49, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Was this written by a chat bot? Drmies (talk) 13:50, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

No, the whole page was written by me. Noamonsol234 (talk) 13:53, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: IranNastaliq (May 20)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, MSK, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

• hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
• unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
• copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

• Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
• Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:IranNastaliq to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

msk 21:55, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Noamonsol234! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! msk 21:55, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: IranNastaliq (May 21)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Athanelar, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:IranNastaliq to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Athanelar (talk) 22:37, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: IranNastaliq (May 22)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Gurkubondinn, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

• hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
• unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
• copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:IranNastaliq to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

--gurkubondinn 21:42, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: IranNastaliq has been accepted

IranNastaliq, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HazelAlbertSheriff (talk) 07:12, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

I would note that the 12th reference has a cite error, as the you used the refname two times but never defined it. Please feel free to fix it, everything else looks good. Thanks. HazelAlbertSheriff (talk) 07:15, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Thank you very much, HazelAlbertSheriff!!! I'm thrilled to see this article live after working on it for a while. Thanks for taking the time to review it, and I'll keep working on improving it! Noamonsol234 (talk) 18:36, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

August 2026

Hello, Noamonsol234. I noticed that your recent edit to IranNastaliq added a link to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For future reference, images can be uploaded via the file upload wizard. For additional instructions on how to upload files, please see Wikipedia's image tutorial. Please be sure to also read Wikipedia's image use policy to ensure your image abides by copyright guidelines. Thank you. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 13:57, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks Katniss! Appreciate the heads-up. It was just a typo in the file name. I've fixed it in the article and the image is rendering properly now. Cheers! Noamonsol234 (talk) 14:57, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of IranNastaliq for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IranNastaliq is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IranNastaliq until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Kisseran (talk) 10:53, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Draftify or Keep: I understand the concerns regarding AI usage in this draft (WP:LLM). To be clear, I used an LLM strictly to help clean up the formatting and organization, but that inadvertently introduced bad markup and awkward phrasing. That was a mistake on my part, and I take full responsibility for it. However, the underlying subject is notable, and the article is built on genuine secondary Persian and technical sources (such as IRNA, Mehr, Typography Day papers, and HarfBuzz documentation) that I spent six months thoroughly researching. If the current text is deemed unfit for mainspace, I kindly request that the article be draftified back to Draft space rather than deleted, so I can manually rewrite it from scratch, strip out all AI-influenced phrasing, and fix the markup properly. Noamonsol234 (talk) 18:59, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

September 2026

Please refrain from posting comments generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia talk pages, such as those you posted to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IranNastaliq. Your comments have been collapsed per the relevant guideline. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Using LLMs to write comments is a violation of WP:AITALK and continued use may be grounds for a block. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:21, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

AI helps me translate the parts I don't know. And secondly, I didn't use an LLM for most of the sentences. Noamonsol234 (talk) 09:01, 9 September 2026 (UTC)