Jump to content

User talk:Oustsync

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit source]
Hello, Oustsync!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Adflatusstalk 05:09, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reference names

[edit source]

Thanks for merging the duplicate references on 2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings. This is just a note that if you use a multi-word reference name you need to enclose it in double quote marks; e.g. <ref name="Al jazeera latest updates"> rather than <ref name=Al jazeera latest updates>. Best wishes, and happy editing, Wham2001 (talk) 20:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

MOS:US

[edit source]

See MOS:US, retain U.S. in American or Canadian English articles in which it is already established, unless there is a good reason to change it refers to older articles which had U.S. established before the switch over to US. A new article with U.S. is not established, and just going against the MOS guidelines. Raskuly (talk) 00:55, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Islamic terrorist incidents in 2026

[edit source]

A tag has been placed on Category:Islamic terrorist incidents in 2026 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 12:05, 23 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Removal of sourced material

[edit source]

Hello, please self revert your most recent removal of sourced material and join the discussion to the talk page at Talk:2026 Islamic Center of San Diego shooting#Landscaper was confirmed injured Mikewem (talk) 21:05, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

June 2026

[edit source]

Information icon Hello! I'm ~2026-35915-67. I just wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the page 2024 Colorado House of Representatives election have been reverted because they appear to have added incorrect information. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source, discuss it on the article's talk page, or leave me a message on my talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. ~2026-35915-67 (talk) 15:16, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

July 2026

[edit source]

Information icon Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Template:Colorado wildfires. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. You can also install the userscript found here to help find and eliminate these errors. Thanks. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:33, 5 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

August 2026

[edit source]

Hello! I noticed my edit was reverted with the summary "Rv sock." Could you please clarify what that means and why my edit was reverted? Thank you. ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 08:17, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please ignore this comment, I sent it to the wrong person. ShrimpsAreTasty (talk) 08:20, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
[edit source]

Hi, I saw you just added secondary year links to all the infoboxes for state legislative elections, and I'm curious as to your reasoning for it. I've seen those used before for things like U.S. Senate elections, where they serve the purpose of linking to the last time that same class of seats was up (even directly labeled as such), but I don't think that works as well for state legislative elections. Sets of chambers are not always up in intervals that align with each other cleanly, so you're not going to find the same set of seats when you click the secondary links. All it really does is make for slightly faster navigation if you're linking through a lot of years, but it also clutters the infobox in a way that I find generally unnecessary and detrimental. OutlawRun (talk) 13:39, 10 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Like you said, my reasoning is that it makes for slightly faster navigation. I understand that with state legislative chambers, they're slightly all over the place in terms of timing and it would be infeasible to actually nail down clean and proper navigability. It could partially be solved if the upper house chambers and lower house chambers were split into their own articles, but I admit that would also make for a bit of a mess. I'm not entirely sure what could be done there, but the original way with no secondary year links is very clunky in terms of navigability and I personally find it tedious. Also, when it comes to state legislative elections in even-numbered years, the maps are 95% identical to each other anyway. *shrug* Oustsync (talk) 23:42, 10 September 2026 (UTC)Reply