Skip to content

docs: bring AGENTS.md up to 6.0 - #278

Merged
AThevon merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/agents-md-two-providers
Sep 25, 2026
Merged

AThevon merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/agents-md-two-providers

Conversation

@AThevon

@AThevon AThevon commented Sep 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Contributor docs only, no effect on the shipped app.

  • The intro presents the app as tracking Claude and OpenAI Codex, as two equal providers.
  • The Codex section no longer says menu bar segments, popover metrics and History are deferred beyond 5.14. They shipped in 6.0; only Agent Watchers stay Claude-only, and ProviderCapability is named as the single place that declares it.
  • Token resolution describes what SecurityCLIReader does since [Feature]: Claude Connection hard reset. #268 and [Bug]: Couldn't authorize Claude Code with Homebrew installation #273: it reads every Keychain item under the service name and keeps the one carrying a login, and it returns a KeychainRead whose failures stay distinct. It also covers the token diagnostic, resetConnection(), and the read-only rule as a deliberate product decision.

check-docs.py passes.

Three passages still described the app before 6.0 shipped. The intro
said it tracks Claude usage limits. The Codex section said menu bar
segments, popover metrics and History were deferred beyond 5.14, when
all three shipped with 6.0 and only Agent Watchers stay Claude-only.
And the token resolution section described SecurityCLIReader as a single
lookup, which is exactly the assumption #268 broke.

That section now covers the multi-item Keychain read and why it exists,
the KeychainRead failures and why they must stay distinct (#273), the
token diagnostic and where it surfaces, resetConnection(), and the
read-only rule stated as a product decision, so nobody adds a refresh
path thinking it is a missing feature.
@AThevon
AThevon merged commit 2afbfae into main Sep 25, 2026
3 checks passed
@AThevon
AThevon deleted the docs/agents-md-two-providers branch September 25, 2026 17:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant