You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Warning: Javadoc Warnings
Warning: [WARNING] warning: The -footer option is no longer supported and will be ignored.
Warning: It may be removed in a future release.
Warning: Javadoc Warnings
Warning: [WARNING] warning: The -footer option is no longer supported and will be ignored.
Warning: It may be removed in a future release.
this was happening for osx using jdk 23 adoptopenjdk and has generated a segfault.
I have disable this from the build matrix.
-footer html-code
This option is no longer supported and reports a warning.
It doesn't do anything right now, and may be removed in a future release.
To me, that means the <footer> configuration in maven-javadoc-plugin is also deprecated, or at least deprecated based on the JDK version you are using with the maven-javadoc-plugin.
Activity
Issue #373 Fix JDK 23 build (#374)
olamy commentedon May 28, 2025
fixed with #374
joakime commentedon May 28, 2025
@olamy did you notice the warning?
olamy commentedon May 28, 2025
this was happening for osx using jdk 23 adoptopenjdk and has generated a segfault.
I have disable this from the build matrix.
joakime commentedon May 28, 2025
@olamy you missed the point of that warning, it's not architecture specific, and it has no connection on the segfault in that specific build.
The
-footeroption is deprecated.That same warning is present on the green builds. - https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/actions/runs/15291408104/job/43011765697
https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/23/docs/specs/man/javadoc.html
It doesn't do anything right now, and may be removed in a future release.
To me, that means the
<footer>configuration inmaven-javadoc-pluginis also deprecated, or at least deprecated based on the JDK version you are using with themaven-javadoc-plugin.olamy commentedon May 28, 2025
Oh I see, good point. I was only looking at the output of
javadoc -h, which doesn't mention that.