refactor: use a more efficient querying method - #921
Conversation
|
Thank you for submitting this PR!
Getting other community members to do a review would be great help too on complex PRs (you can ask in the chats/forums). If you are unsure about something, just leave us a comment.
We currently aim to provide initial feedback/triaging within two business days. Please keep an eye on any labelling actions, as these will indicate priorities and status of your contribution. |
|
User has added similar PRs to other projects, probably fishing for airdrops. |
|
@hsanjuan do you know of an active airdrop that is causing all these PRs? |
|
It seems this issue might have been automatically generated. To help us address it effectively, please provide additional details. We value the use of LLMs for code generation and welcome your contributions but please ensure your submission is of such quality that a maintainer will spend less time reviewing it than implementing it themselves. Verify the code functions correctly and meets our standards. If your change requires tests, kindly include them and ensure they pass. If no further information is provided, the issue will be automatically closed in 7 days. Thank you for your understanding and for aiding us in maintaining quality contributions! |
Signed-off-by: pullmerge <watchmessi@outlook.com>
There is a new function added in the go1.21 standard library, which can make the code more concise and easy to read.