We Who Are About To…, Joanna Russ (1975)
Review by Bart
After finishing a book, I usually read up on other reviews and stuff before starting my own. Thereâs no use in repeating what others already have written. When I came across a review by L. Timmel Duchamp â an SF author herself â published in the February 2006 issue of the New York Review of Science Fiction, it quickly dawned on me it was no use of even starting the review I had in mind, as her text said about everything I wanted to say â references to Robinson Crusoe included â but better. It also opened up my understanding of the novel. Not that I had totally missed one of the political messages of the book, but I hadnât perceived its full importance:
As I read it, the soliloquy not only allows the narrator to put herself â once a âNeochristianâ â on trial for murder, but also explores enough of her history to make it possible for the reader to understand her series of responses to the situation following the crash. Through the soliloquy we discover that the narratorâs despair is not so much existential as political in the most fundamental sense of the word. At the time of the crash, the narrator was in full flight from a life of political activism and idealism that had smashed on the rocks of discursive politics. As part of a burgeoning movement of dissent, she learned the painful lesson of who may speak in a polis controlled by vast political and financial machinery (which these days we generally name âglobal capitalismâ).
The main gist of what I want to say is that We Who Are About To⌠is a lot more than a feminist novel. Framing the novel only as such â an easy mistake as Russ is the author of the better known The Female Man, and maybe even more importantly as identity politics is important in todayâs discourse on culture â does the novel a tremendous disservice. Not that its feminist stance is not important, on the contrary, and well-done at that. But Iâll refrain from elaborating further, and urge you to read the entirety of Duchampâs take â if youâve read the book already that is, as the first experience of this book suffers badly if youâve had too many spoilers.
Whatâs left for me to say? I thought maybe of writing a text on how the unnamed protagonist of this book is a kind of opposite to the childbearing character in PD James’s Children Of Men, but doing so would also focus on the feminist side of the novel, and that wouldnât be in sync with what I wrote above.
For that same reason Iâll refrain from elaborate comparisons to The Handmaidâs Tale, a book thatâs about forced pregnancies as well. Atwoodâs book is 10 years younger, but itâs a lot less radical in conception. More importantly: as a social analysis, it is also a lot less believable.
Then Lord Of The Flies popped into my head, and sure, there are parallels aplenty, if you just look at what Wikipedia has to say about Goldingâs themes:
At an allegorical level, the central theme is the conflicting human impulses toward civilization and social organizationâliving by rules, peacefully and in harmonyâand toward the will to power. Themes include the tension between groupthink and individuality, between rational and emotional reactions, and between morality and immorality.
Whatâs maybe left underdeveloped in Duchampâs review, is the existential, philosophical aspect of We Who Are About To⌠Not that I have a lot to say about that either, just that at certain times the main character seems to live out her life simply being â and explicitly referring to Eastern modes of thinking: acceptance, the works, including Tao â yes, Tao, again. I think itâs one of the important themes in the book, and I could quote a few bits here and there, but ultimately it would be like reading a rehash of stuff youâve already read on all those millennial lifestyle blogs â I know they didnât exist in the 1970s, but hey, what kind of reader of speculative literature would you be if youâd object to a bad time-travel paradox?
Thereâs one final thing I want to highlight, and thatâs Russâs visionary power. Certain aspects of male chauvinist psychology are brilliantly evoked in the following passage, and without a lot of words Russ nails a part of the reason why movements opposing the importance of identity politics have gained so much traction recently.
Alan looks happy. I mean it: not triumphant, not overbearing, simply happy. He glows. The twenty-first century canât have been kind to this enormous fellow, and now heâs discovering other interesting things to do: chopping down trees, lifting rock with his bare hands, fighting, knocking down women. Too bad heâs so young…
It might read like caricature, but Iâm quite sure it isnât. The increased empathy of the last couple of decades indeed hasnât been kind to the mindset of those people that reserve their moral concern for a circle thatâs less expanded than the circles of the progressive discourse that was dominant before Trump got elected.
I guess Iâm only left with a quick assessment. The prose is snappy and confident. Russ shows keen psychological insight more than a few times. As far as plot and structure goes her choices are awesome: this book is not what you think it will be when you start reading it with only the feminist-planet-crash blurb in mind. Russ made some radical decisions, and itâs best those arenât spoiled.
In short, We Are About To⌠is a brave book, not an easy, generic read. Itâs definitely recommended for fans of vintage scifi that do not mind their stuff a bit different.
This review originally appeared on Weighing a Pig Doesn’t Fatten It.
Wayward Moon, Denny DeMartino (2001)
The Killing Thing, Kate Wilhelm (1967)
Memoirs of a Spacewoman, Naomi Mitchison (1962)
The Birth Machine, Elizabeth Baines (1983)
Bluesong, Sydney J Van Scyoc (1983)
The Two of Them, Joanna Russ (1978)
The Best of Leigh Brackett, Leigh Brackett (1986)
The Dancers of Noyo, Margaret St Clair (1973)
The Hidden Side of the Moon, Joanna Russ (1987)