Top.Mail.Ru
? ?
Sandy
18 February 2011 @ 09:08 pm
My recent physics class involved a book written by a very preachy author. I have come to the conclusion that text books should be written by multiple authors to avoid this sort of problem. Conceptual Physics, 11th Edition, by Paul G. Hewitt is filled with his advice about non-physics related things like politics and biology, which he makes clear that he doesn't actually understand.

So, in my (not-so) spare time, I made snarky comments in the margins when something in the book really irritated me. I suppose this was one of the ways I stayed sane while cramming so much information into my brain.


Why physicists shouldn't be nutritionists.






In addition to this, he also raved about the technophilic physicist who started the "Venus Project," part of that whacko documentary, "Zeitgeist: Addendum." Yes, apparently lots 'n lots o' flashy sci-fi technology is going to save the world.


This was just a result of my accumulated frustration.



 
 
 
Music of My Soul: The Elements, by Tom Lehrer
I am feeling: irritatedirritated
 
 
Sandy
01 September 2005 @ 07:07 pm
Ganga

You scored 19 intellect, 2 prosperity, 6 sexuality, and 27 goodness!
Ganga's outstanding quality is that she is good. She is a river goddess - the goddess personified by the largest river in India, in fact. When the people of the world were left without water (long story why) she agreed to fall to earth as a great river, her impact softened by the hair of the god Shiva, to save humankind. Now the river she is said to inhabit is the most revered in India.










My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 0% on intellect
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 25% on prosperity
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 75% on sexuality
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 75% on goodness




Link: The Which Hindu Goddess Are You? Test written by mirchini on OkCupid Free Online Dating
 
 
Music of My Soul: Snow on the Sahara by Anggun
I am feeling: cheerfulcheerful
 
 
 
Sandy
23 August 2005 @ 01:41 am

Part of this was cross-posted to the Wobblies community, because someone was mentioning recruiting red-staters to become liberal, kind of in the fashion that Evangelists recruit people successfully. So I shared my story about some people I find particularly vulnerable. I remember this one guy I talked to on IM had an ex-girlfriend who had a weird Mormon fetish. He said he thought it was their innocence and vulnerability. Exactly my point.

Mormon boys are required, I believe at age 19 (?) to start proselytizing. But, as boys who were just raised in Mormon households and not exposed to other beliefs, they are very vulnerable to other ideas. Considering the fact that Utah is the center or Mormonism, and it was about 85% red last election, talking to young Mormon boys would be a good start.

True story: At a bus stop in Berkeley, CA (where I'm from), I noticed a few young men dressed in beige suits and ties, and thought they stood out more than anyone else on the street. One of them approached me, probably because I was wearing a Celtic Cross at the time, and I think they try to get Christians. He asked, "Have you heard of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints?" and I said, "Yeah, Mormons, right?" Then I went on to talk about how I'm fascinated with religion, and love to learn about all kinds, and said I'd love to read the Book of Mormon some time. I said that at my church (the Unitarian Universalist Church), in our youth group, we get to study all different beliefs and religions, to find out which ones are best for us.

He said, "Wow, that sounds really cool," and I told him where the church was, and that he should check it out. He said, "sure," and then walked away without saying anything else about his religion.
Just approach them with a curious, open-minded attitude (they appreciate that, since I'm sure they get a lot of abuse from some people), and talk to them, and they can be surprisingly open.
 
 
Music of My Soul: Wouldn't it be Good? by Nik Kershaw
I am feeling: curiouscurious
 
 
Sandy
14 August 2005 @ 03:41 am
I'm slee-py. My calico kitty is sleeping on my couch with her white belly-fur up, and she makes these part-snoring grunting sounds when she sleeps. It's so cute.
The asshole who wrote the God Test on OKCupid wrote back to me. He has an ignorant, completely condescending attitude toward anything and anyone spiritual. I'd say he's the kind of atheist who's just as bad as any fundamentalist Christian. "If you don't believe exactly what I believe, then you're just like those Fundies," is what he's basically saying. He says, "You seem to call forces and relationships that can be scientifically observed and measured 'God', and at the same time you seem to tack on this idea of God to the big bang and consider that an explanation for our lack of understanding about its cause." Yes, that's me. "Tacking on" spiritual ideas without giving them good thought. My spirituality brought me out of a suicidal depression. Without it, I'd either be dead, or completely miserable. Unlike born-agains, I don't claim to have been "saved" by my spirituality; I saved myself by creating this spirituality. My spirituality is not based on facts; it's based on feelings, and I don't claim to be correct. I don't claim that ANYTHING proves the existence of god or the lack thereof. But spiritually-dead boy doesn't understand that, because his mind is too filled with bigotry to have room for anything else. My philosophy is what is my moral backbone, and THAT'S based in fact. Evolution doesn't prove god or whatever force exists; it only proves it to ME. The Big Bang doesn't either, except to me. If there were unmistakable evidence that there is no god, (which is impossible to prove and never will be proved regardless of whether or not a god exists), then I'd be like, okay, there's no god. I'm not shocked. And if there were evidence (once again, probably impossible) that god did exist, I'd be equally unimpressed. The point isn't whether or not I believe or anyone else believes a god or supernatural entity or force exists. The point is what we do with our lives, how we treat others, and how we treat ourselves. Too many people, atheist and not, are so caught up in proving they're right about the existence of god, that they don't do what's actually necessary. By the way, atheist-boy, I never said that god explained our LACK of understanding about the Big Bang. I said god explained what we DO understand about the Big Bang. Fuck-wad. People like him are why we're not going anywhere. We're both anti-Bush, anti-organized religion, but he's to obsessed with sneering at people he has so much in common with to actually communicate and not alienate them, and get to driving Bush out.
 
 
I am feeling: pissed offPissed off
 
 
 
Sandy
12 August 2005 @ 02:40 am

I love to post my messages and emails to other people, because most of my writing talent comes out in my letters. Just kidding. I hope. Anyway, as an OKCupid freak, I take a lot of tests, and I am especially attracted to the ones with spiritual or political content. So it turns out that the questions on the test seem to assume that you believe in a very Christian or at least organized religion god, which irritated me. So, in response, I wrote this irritating, knit-picking email that is so respectful and politically correct that it makes it even MORE annoying. I'm just so cool.

I find that I tend to have a lot in common with atheists when I talk to them. However, there are always some who seem to be just as closed-minded as those who follow organized religions.
The fact that each one of your questions has only two answer choices leads me to believe (as an impression, however incorrect I may be) that you are not open-minded to other spiritual beliefs, and don't see the difference between being spiritual and being religious. Please don't be defensive; I'm just explaining the impression that your test gives. In reality, there are countless explanations of what god is, most of which are not related to the monotheistic Christian version. If you haven't already, you should check into Eastern and pagan philosophies, because they have an interesting concept that god is not separate from us; god IS us. I'll explain further, using my response to some of your questions (based on my own spiritual beliefs):

1. Do you believe that God is a force or a being?
I believe that what some may call god is actually the relationship between everything in existence, or what I call the interconnected web of existence. This mostly comes from what I've read about quantum physics, although it is a very animistic belief. Therefore, god is ALL beings, and ALL forces. So I cannot choose outright.

2. Which of the following is the primary reason you believe in God? (Choose the one that best represents your reasons for believing.)
The reasons I believe in "god" equally have to do with things that science CAN explain, and things that it can't. Some of what I've found in chaos theory and quantum physics leads me to believe that there is an order to it all, which may be what god is. Everyone has faith in something, or they wouldn't believe anything. And I'm not just talking about religious or spiritual beliefs.
The beauty I see around me, the compassion that humans can have for each other, all completely explainable, help me see what "god" is.

3. Do you have a personal relationship with God?
Since I am part of god, and so is everything else, it is impossible not to have a personal relationship with god. But it is not me relating to one other entity, it is me relating to myself and everything in existence.

4. Is God conscious or unconscious?
God is both conscious and unconscious, since god is everything.

5. God's existence is revealed by many of the mysterious things that occur in life (such as miracles, holes in scientific theories, and so on).
God's existence is revealed by everything mysterious and non-mysterious that occurs in life.

6. Do you believe God will judge us one day according to moral standards?
No, god doesn't judge us as a separate being. But god certainly is involved in our affairs, since we are god.

7. The world was obviously designed, because evolution is a flawed theory.
The world was obviously designed, because evolution is a great and well-proven theory.

8. Do you believe God has an interest in the affairs of humanity?
Once again, it's impossible for god not to be.

9. Religion explains the things that our senses cannot.
I am not religious; therefore, I don't believe religion explains anything except why there's so much corruption in the world. However, some of my spiritual beliefs explain things that our senses cannot, as well as things that our senses can.

10. My God demands worship and devotion of His followers.
This one I can honestly say, no, that's ridiculous, unless by worship, you mean respect for everything in this amazing universe.

As you can see, I don't think that science and spirituality are mutually exclusive; quite the opposite. I believe they both strengthen each other. The theory of the Big Bang was first thought up of by a priest, who was trying to bridge the scientific and religious questions of how the universe began. Unfortunately, we see a lot of Christians, as well as others, knocking the Big Bang theory to prove themselves right, when in fact the Big Bang DOES prove them right.

Please feel free to contact me about spirituality, or explain what you really meant to express on your test, if you haven't already. And remember, I wouldn't have sent you this LONG email if I didn't think your test was a good idea and deserved some attention (as well as tweaking).

Peace,



Sitakali
 
 
Music of My Soul: Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds
I am feeling: contemplativeContemplative
 
 
 
Sandy
23 July 2005 @ 01:33 am

“So you think you can tell…heaven from hell, blue skies from pain.”

Those words have spoken to me for some reason. And I’m not interpreting them the same way that some people might. I connect them with my life, and think, there are so many people who do think they can tell, think they’re better than others, who are so self-righteous about things. I know I get that from Max all the time. Stop being so self-righteous, and think about things more clearly. And while I think he’s got some thinking to do too, I think he may be right about this. Maybe not to the extreme that he thinks he’s right, but. Okay, I’ll explain what I’m talking about. We all form our world views and opinions from our own experiences, our own perspectives. Some of those experiences may be more educational than others. I think that if you’re going to be self-righteous, it’s your responsibility to really see what your views mean. I preach about how we (middle-class) in America don’t know nearly as much what it’s like to suffer from the consequences of imperialism as those in the Third World do. Now it’s time for me to see for myself what those consequences are. Yes, I know intellectually. But I need to know more viscerally. I can’t claim to experience the poverty and injustices that others experience, but I can get a better feel for them than I have now. So back to Pink Floyd. Can you tell heaven from hell? Just because life on this Earth for you is filled with abundance and beauty, doesn’t mean it is for others. Your heaven may be their hell. Blue skies from pain? You think you know what suffering is? Or maybe just the snippet you’ve seen of suffering. I can imagine if I get out of this country, I’ll understand the world faster, even if it just means going to Europe. Simply because people outside this country seem to have a better understand of the world, and maybe even America. I’m not saying that people in this country, even well-off people, haven’t suffered. There are all kinds of suffering. But if you learn about the other kinds, the kinds you haven’t experienced, maybe you’ll understand the world better. And maybe it’s the other way around too. You think you know happiness, just because of this abundance, just because you can afford anything you want? Maybe you won’t know happiness until you give your most precious material items away. And when I say “you”, I’m talking about myself, too. Say you’re beautiful, have the house and car of your dreams, go to Banana Republic for all your shopping needs, etc., but then you move into a little Appalachian community, and suddenly, you know exactly what life’s about, what’s been missing all these years. “If there’s nothing missing in my life, then why do these tears come at night?” Say, Brittany Spears, you sing the song, but do you understand the words?

“Can you tell a green field from a cold steel rail? A smile from a veil? Do you think you can tell?”

 
 
I am feeling: contemplativeEnlightened
Music of My Soul: Wish You Were Here by Pink Floyd, duh
 
 
 
Sandy
19 July 2005 @ 02:56 am

A veritable blend of all the pantheons and perhaps a dash of a few other religions as well, you're the versitile Ecclectic Pagan. You have no problem wearing an ankh while setting an offering to Herne on your alter just below your image of Hera. You don't believe in coloring within the lines, and are a bright free-thinker. While you respect the views of your fellow pagans, as far as you're concerned, religion is the sky, and there's no one about to clip your wings with lines and limitations.

You scored as Ecclectic Pagan.

</td>

Ecclectic Pagan

90%

Shamanic Pagan

75%

Egyptian Pantheonic Pagan

70%

Eastern Pagan

65%

Zoroastrian Pagan

50%

Roman Pantheonic Pagan

40%

Kabbalistic Pagan

40%

Sumerian, Babylonian, and Mesopotamian Pagans

35%

Celtic Pantheonic Pagan

30%

Greek Pantheonic Pagan

25%

Catholic (Pagan?)

10%

Norse Pantheonic Pagan (Asatru)

0%

What kind of Pagan are you?
created with QuizFarm.com
 
 
I am feeling: accomplishedAccomplished
Music of My Soul: Memory of Your Shores by Anggun