Log In
Massachusetts; Keystone Prospect, Ketchikan Gateway Borough, Alaska, USAi
| Regional Level Types | |
|---|---|
| Massachusetts; Keystone Prospect | Prospect |
| Ketchikan Gateway Borough | Borough |
| Alaska | State |
| USA | Country |
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
55° 23' 13'' North , 131° 10' 8'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Type:
Köppen climate type:
Nearest Settlements:
| Place | Population | Distance |
|---|---|---|
| Saxman | 417 (2017) | 28.0km |
| Ketchikan | 8,197 (2017) | 30.7km |
| Metlakatla | 1,405 (2017) | 38.6km |
Wright and Wright (1908, p. 148) refer to this property as the Massachusetts claims nos. 1 and 2, and note that they were originally known as the Keystone claims (Brooks, 1902, p. 68).
Location: This prospect is at an elevation of 500 feet in the south wall of the unnamed creek that flows west into Granite Lake . The site is about 0.3 mile east of Granite Lake, in section 8, T. 75 S., R. 94 E., of the Copper River Meridian. It corresponds to loc. 86 in Elliott and others (1978), and to loc. 298 in Maas and others (1995). The location is accurate within 0.1 mile.
Geology: The country rocks in this part of Revillagigedo Island are marine, interbedded, andesitic and basaltic metavolcanic rocks and subordinate pelitic metasedimentary rocks that are intruded by stocks, sills, and dikes of Cretaceous feldspar-porphyritic granodiorite (Berg and others, 1988). The strata and some of the granodiorite were regionally metamorphosed to greenschist grade in Late Cretaceous time. These regionally metamorphosed rocks subsequently were locally remetamorphosed to hornblende hornfels near the contacts of Cretaceous granodiorite plutons that were emplaced after the regional metamorphism. The premetamorphic age of the strata is uncertain. Berg and others (1988) assign them a Mesozoic or (late) Paleozoic age. Berg (1982) and Crawford and others (2000) assign them to the Gravina belt, of Late Jurassic or Cretaceous age, or to the Taku terrane, of late Paleozoic to Late Triassic age. The metamorphic and intrusive rocks locally are overlain by basalt and andesite lava flows of Quaternary or Tertiary age. The deposit consists of a sulfide-bearing quartz fissure vein in intercalated metapelitic and metavolcanic (greenstone) schists that are cut by a granodiorite dike (Wright and Wright, 1908, p. 148-9). The vein at the surface is five feet wide, but at depth it decreases to six inches and divides into stringers. The sulfides are pyrite, galena, and sphalerite, accompanied by favorable gold values near the surface. According to Maas and others (1995, p. 215), the Massachusetts auriferous veins strike NE and are hosted in hydrothermally altered mafic metavolcanic rocks that crop out on both sides of the granodiorite dike (see Alteration). The quartz in these veins is not recrystallized, so the veins are probably younger than most or all of the Late Cretaceous regional metamorphism. The prospect was explored in the early 1900s by several opencuts, an 80-foot adit, a 30-foot shaft, and a 50-foot drift off the shaft. Gold values of $12/ton (Au at $20.67/oz.) were reported by the operators at that time (Brooks, 1902, p. 68). Maas and others (1995, p. 217, 218) report a mean value of 2071 ppb Au in 12 samples of the Massachusetts deposit; their best assay showed 11.1 ppm Au and 134 ppm Ag in a 3-foot sample across the main vein.
Workings: The prospect was explored in the early 1900s by several opencuts, an 80-foot adit, a 30-foot shaft, and a 50-foot drift off the shaft. Gold values of $12/ton (Au at $20.67/oz.) were reported by the operators at that time (Brooks, 1902, p. 68). Maas and others (1995, p. 217, 218) report a mean value of 2071 ppb Au in 12 samples of the Massachusetts deposit; their best assay showed 11.1 ppm Au and 134 ppm Ag in a 3-foot sample across the main vein.
Age: Late Cretaceous or younger.
Alteration: According to Maas and others (1995, p. 215), the wallrocks of the auriferous veins in the Sea Level mine area are hydrothermally altered to bluish-gray carbonate-sericite-pyrite rock, called 'blue porphyry' in some early reports (for example, Brooks, 1902; Wright and Wright, 1908) (also see KC095).
Commodities (Major) - Au; (Minor) - Pb, Zn
Development Status: None
Deposit Model: Low-sulfide gold-quartz veins (Cox and Singer, 1986; model 36a)
Select Mineral List Type
Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical ElementsCommodity List
This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.Mineral List
5 valid minerals.
Detailed Mineral List:
| ⓘ Galena Formula: PbS |
| ⓘ Gold Formula: Au |
| ⓘ Pyrite Formula: FeS2 |
| ⓘ Quartz Formula: SiO2 |
| ⓘ Sphalerite Formula: ZnS |
Gallery:
List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification
| Group 1 - Elements | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ⓘ | Gold | 1.AA.05 | Au |
| Group 2 - Sulphides and Sulfosalts | |||
| ⓘ | Sphalerite | 2.CB.05a | ZnS |
| ⓘ | Galena | 2.CD.10 | PbS |
| ⓘ | Pyrite | 2.EB.05a | FeS2 |
| Group 4 - Oxides and Hydroxides | |||
| ⓘ | Quartz | 4.DA.05 | SiO2 |
List of minerals for each chemical element
| O | Oxygen | |
|---|---|---|
| O | ⓘ Quartz | SiO2 |
| Si | Silicon | |
| Si | ⓘ Quartz | SiO2 |
| S | Sulfur | |
| S | ⓘ Galena | PbS |
| S | ⓘ Pyrite | FeS2 |
| S | ⓘ Sphalerite | ZnS |
| Fe | Iron | |
| Fe | ⓘ Pyrite | FeS2 |
| Zn | Zinc | |
| Zn | ⓘ Sphalerite | ZnS |
| Au | Gold | |
| Au | ⓘ Gold | Au |
| Pb | Lead | |
| Pb | ⓘ Galena | PbS |
Other Databases
| Link to USGS - Alaska: | KC089 |
|---|
Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality
North AmericaContinent
- Coast MountainsMountain Range
North America PlateTectonic Plate
- Taku DomainDomain
- Yukon-TananaVolcanic Arc
USA
- Alaska
- Ketchikan Mining DistrictMining District
This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to
visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders
for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.