Lituya Bay Gold Mining Co. Mine, Yakutat Mining District, Hoonah-Angoon Census Area, Alaska, USAi
| Regional Level Types | |
|---|---|
| Lituya Bay Gold Mining Co. Mine | Mine |
| Yakutat Mining District | Mining District |
| Hoonah-Angoon Census Area | Census Area |
| Alaska | State |
| USA | Country |
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
58° 42' 25'' North , 137° 45' 36'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Type:
Köppen climate type:
The beach placers are in Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve. Claims could still exist, but probably the site is inactive. The recovery of the very fine-grained gold of the Lituya area by flotation and non-traditional gravity methods has been studied by Cook (1969). The beach system is part of a very extensive system of heavy-mineral beaches along the west coast of North America (Clifton and Luepke, 1987).
Location: The beach placer extends for about 17 miles from Cape Fairweather southeasterly to La Chausee Spit at the north side of the mouth of Lituya Bay. Coordinates are the approximate mid-point of the placer deposit. The location is essentially that of figure C5 of Kimball and others (1978) which includes their blocks 2, 3, and 4 and sample lines 3-12. The northwest part of the placer deposit is in the Mt. Fairweather D-6 quadrangle.
Geology: The beach, and related older upland placer deposits that were produced at higher sea stands, occur as layers and lenses of heavy minerals concentrated as lighter materials are washed away by alluvial and littoral processes. On the modern beach valuable transient deposits are formed, especially during heavy spring storms. The economically valuable minerals occur in ruby and black sands that, respectively, are rich in garnet and in magnetite or ilmenite. The heavy sands also contain epidote, olivine, pyroxene, sphene and staurolite as well as remnant amounts of quartz, feldspar, and light rock fragments. Some of the richest deposits exploited in the early years of the Twentieth century were near Eagle and Echo Creeks. Wright and Wright (1907, p. 64-65) proposed that these creeks brought down weakly metalliferous sediments that were further concentrated by surf action into transient valuable heavy sand deposits. Other deposits probably form by reworking of glacial outwash and gravels brought down from the Fairweather Range and adjacent hard bed hills. Some platinum has been reported (Mertie, 1918, p. 23). PGEs and ilmenite and magnetite have their ultimate source in deposits associated with the layerered gabbro intrusions of the Fairweather Range.
Workings: The area was first mined by Americans in about 1886 (Brooks, 1918, p. 41). About $15,000 worth of gold was mined in 1891 (Wright and Wright, 1907, p. 64-65). In 1901, Lituya Bay Gold Mining Company tried to establish large-scale placer operations near the mouths of Eagle and Echo Creeks, but were unsuccessful because of the limited size of the pay streaks and difficulties in moving equipment and hydraulic systems (Wright and Wright, 1907, p. 64-65). Nonetheless, the area was mined on a small scale amost continuously from 1891 until World War II. In addition to the reports cited above, yearly resource reports by the U.S. Geological Survey indicate nearly continuous small scale mining. These reports include Brooks (1919, 1922, 1923, and 1925), Brooks and Martin (1921), Brooks and Capps (1924), Martin (1920) and Mertie (1933). P. S. Smith reported activity in the reports issued in 1934, 1936, 1937, 1938, two reports in 1939, 1941 and 1942. There was a lesser amount of gold activity after World War II, but claims were probably maintained. Summary reports include those by Cobb in 1972 (MF-436 and OFR-508), Berg and Cobb in 1967, and Cobb in 1973. More recent work has concentrated on valuable industrial minerals, notably ilmenite. Extensive sampling programs for the U.S. Bureau of Mines were undertaken by Thomas and Berryhill (1962), Kimball and others (1978, figure C5 and C11 to C18, tables C8 to C12), and Foley and others, (1995, fig. 17). Rossman (1957) and MacKevett and others (1971) studied the area for the U.S. Geological Survey.
Age: Holocene.
Production: Production in 1891 $15,000 was reported by Wright and Wright (1907), who also noted 'In later years even higher returns are said to have been maintained, but no authentic statements could be obtained..' Mertie (1933) proposed that about 4000 ounces of gold had been produced between 1890 and 1917.
Reserves: Kimball and others (1978, table C23) calculated about 2,732,000 cubic yards of material from sample lines 3-12 and blocks 2-3. The largest resource, however, 1,809,000 cubic yards, contains less than 1 percent of ilmenite and only about .0003 ounce/cubic yard in gold. Small blocks totaling about 43,000 cubic yards near Eagle and Echo Creeks contain about 2.5 percent ilmenite and average as much as 0.0008 ounce per cubic yard gold. Foley and others (1995) reported 0.564 ppm gold and 4.09 percent ilmenite in a spiral concentrate split of sample 301.
Commodities (Major) - Au, Fe, Ti; (Minor) - PGE
Development Status: Yes
Deposit Model: Beach placer and related upland buried placers; possibly offshore deposits.
Select Mineral List Type
Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical ElementsCommodity List
This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.Mineral List
5 valid minerals.
Detailed Mineral List:
| ⓘ 'Garnet Group' Formula: X3Z2(SiO4)3 |
| ⓘ Ilmenite Formula: Fe2+TiO3 |
| ⓘ Magnetite Formula: Fe2+Fe3+2O4 |
| ⓘ Native Gold Formula: Au |
| ⓘ Rutile Formula: TiO2 |
| ⓘ Zircon Formula: Zr(SiO4) |
Gallery:
List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification
| Group 1 - Elements | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ⓘ | Native Gold | 1.AA.05 | Au |
| Group 4 - Oxides and Hydroxides | |||
| ⓘ | Magnetite | 4.BB.05 | Fe2+Fe3+2O4 |
| ⓘ | Ilmenite | 4.CB.05 | Fe2+TiO3 |
| ⓘ | Rutile | 4.DB.05 | TiO2 |
| Group 9 - Silicates | |||
| ⓘ | Zircon | 9.AD.30 | Zr(SiO4) |
| Unclassified | |||
| ⓘ | 'Garnet Group' | - | X3Z2(SiO4)3 |
List of minerals for each chemical element
| O | Oxygen | |
|---|---|---|
| O | ⓘ Ilmenite | Fe2+TiO3 |
| O | ⓘ Magnetite | Fe2+Fe23+O4 |
| O | ⓘ Rutile | TiO2 |
| O | ⓘ Zircon | Zr(SiO4) |
| O | ⓘ Garnet Group | X3Z2(SiO4)3 |
| Si | Silicon | |
| Si | ⓘ Zircon | Zr(SiO4) |
| Si | ⓘ Garnet Group | X3Z2(SiO4)3 |
| Ti | Titanium | |
| Ti | ⓘ Ilmenite | Fe2+TiO3 |
| Ti | ⓘ Rutile | TiO2 |
| Fe | Iron | |
| Fe | ⓘ Ilmenite | Fe2+TiO3 |
| Fe | ⓘ Magnetite | Fe2+Fe23+O4 |
| Zr | Zirconium | |
| Zr | ⓘ Zircon | Zr(SiO4) |
| Au | Gold | |
| Au | ⓘ Native Gold | Au |
Other Databases
| Link to USGS - Alaska: | MF041 |
|---|
Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality
North AmericaContinent
North America Plate
- Yakutat-Dangerous DomainDomain
- YakutatOphiolite Complex
Pacific OceanOcean
Pacific PlateTectonic Plate
This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to
visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders
for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.