Log In
Bellavista Mine, Miramar, Montes de Oro Canton, Puntarenas Province, Costa Ricai
| Regional Level Types | |
|---|---|
| Bellavista Mine | Mine |
| Miramar | Town |
| Montes de Oro Canton | Canton |
| Puntarenas Province | Province |
| Costa Rica | Country |
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
10° 6' 48'' North , 84° 42' 44'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Type:
KÃķppen climate type:
Nearest Settlements:
| Place | Population | Distance |
|---|---|---|
| Miramar | 6,540 (2018) | 3.0km |
| Esparza | 15,575 (2016) | 14.2km |
| Macacona | 840 (2016) | 14.7km |
| Chacarita | 26,354 (2016) | 16.1km |
| Puntarenas | 35,650 (2016) | 20.6km |
Other/historical names associated with this locality:
Bella Vista - Montezuma Mine
A gold property started in the early 1900s (?). Owned by ReaGold Corp (Operator).
Glencairn purchased the project from Wheaton River in 2002. Planned reopening in 2004.
Glencairn Gold Corporation, a Canadian company with mining and exploration activities focused in Central America, purchased the Bellavista project in Costa Rica from Wheaton River Minerals in 2001.
âĒ In May 2002 the government of Costa Rica placed a ban on new open pit mining and commercial-scale cyanide processing. Two gold mining projects, Glencairn Gold Corporationâs Bellavista and the Cerro Crucitas, owned by Vannessa Ventures Ltd., also of Canada, were in the process of environmental approval or already approved. Both mines were eventually permitted to operate after years of bureaucratic process and in spite of community protests and scientistsâ warnings that Bellavistaâs regional topography and heavy rainfall were not appropriate for a large-scale open-pit mine.
âĒ Groups critiqued plans for the Bellavista mine and the Environmental Management Plan for failing to adequately address concerns over water pollution and acid mine drainage, water over-use, and prevention of cyanide leaks, financial bonding, mine closure and various other environmental and economic concerns.
âĒ Local environmental organization CEUS del Golfo reported environmental problems such as drinking water contamination in the nearby town of Miramar (2 km from mine site) in 2003, 2004, and 2005, during the initial earth-moving and testing stages of the project.
âĒ Glencairn began gold extraction in December 2005.
âĒ According to Glencairn, the company noticed in May 2007 that ground movements had caused cracks in two corners of the leach pad, which contains cyanide. Glencairn states that this is due to abnormally heavy rainfall in the region.
âĒ Glencairn in July 2007 was seeking access to the protected Montezuma springs area to conduct âremedial work.â
âĒ On July 25, 2007 Glencairn Gold announced that mining operations, including the application of cyanide, would be suspended at the Bellavista as a âprecautionary measure.â The company cited ground movements at the leach pad and waste piles of around one centimeter per day. According to Glencairn, at this time technical analysis had already begun and remedial action was being implemented.
âĒ On August 14, Glencairn reported that the Bellavista Mine may remain closed indefinitely, but did not disclose information about the current state of the mineâs leach pad and waste piles, potential future impacts on the water resources, local environment and community, or the companyâs plans for clean-up and remediation.
âĒ Glencairn has posted a financial guarantee, or bond of only US $250,000 for reclamation and closure.xi A financial analyst at the Blackburn Group, who has followed Bellavista for a number of years, estimates that the cost of closing the site could be US $10 million.
âĒ Glencairnâs Central American mining operations began in the midst of a mining boom occurring throughout all of Latin America. In 2006, 24 percent of the over US$ 7 billion in nonferrous metals mining exploration worldwide, the highest such global investment ever, occurred in Latin America.
âĒ Glencairn also has mining projects in Nicaragua and Canada and advanced exploration projects in Nicaragua and Panama. In Nicaragua in 2006, the company faced three weeks of protests by workers who were fired from the LimÃģn mine, and operation of the Libertad mine was blamed for pollution of the Rio Mico.
âĒ In May 2002 the government of Costa Rica placed a ban on new open pit mining and commercial-scale cyanide processing. Two gold mining projects, Glencairn Gold Corporationâs Bellavista and the Cerro Crucitas, owned by Vannessa Ventures Ltd., also of Canada, were in the process of environmental approval or already approved. Both mines were eventually permitted to operate after years of bureaucratic process and in spite of community protests and scientistsâ warnings that Bellavistaâs regional topography and heavy rainfall were not appropriate for a large-scale open-pit mine.
âĒ Groups critiqued plans for the Bellavista mine and the Environmental Management Plan for failing to adequately address concerns over water pollution and acid mine drainage, water over-use, and prevention of cyanide leaks, financial bonding, mine closure and various other environmental and economic concerns.
âĒ Local environmental organization CEUS del Golfo reported environmental problems such as drinking water contamination in the nearby town of Miramar (2 km from mine site) in 2003, 2004, and 2005, during the initial earth-moving and testing stages of the project.
âĒ Glencairn began gold extraction in December 2005.
âĒ According to Glencairn, the company noticed in May 2007 that ground movements had caused cracks in two corners of the leach pad, which contains cyanide. Glencairn states that this is due to abnormally heavy rainfall in the region.
âĒ Glencairn in July 2007 was seeking access to the protected Montezuma springs area to conduct âremedial work.â
âĒ On July 25, 2007 Glencairn Gold announced that mining operations, including the application of cyanide, would be suspended at the Bellavista as a âprecautionary measure.â The company cited ground movements at the leach pad and waste piles of around one centimeter per day. According to Glencairn, at this time technical analysis had already begun and remedial action was being implemented.
âĒ On August 14, Glencairn reported that the Bellavista Mine may remain closed indefinitely, but did not disclose information about the current state of the mineâs leach pad and waste piles, potential future impacts on the water resources, local environment and community, or the companyâs plans for clean-up and remediation.
âĒ Glencairn has posted a financial guarantee, or bond of only US $250,000 for reclamation and closure.xi A financial analyst at the Blackburn Group, who has followed Bellavista for a number of years, estimates that the cost of closing the site could be US $10 million.
âĒ Glencairnâs Central American mining operations began in the midst of a mining boom occurring throughout all of Latin America. In 2006, 24 percent of the over US$ 7 billion in nonferrous metals mining exploration worldwide, the highest such global investment ever, occurred in Latin America.
âĒ Glencairn also has mining projects in Nicaragua and Canada and advanced exploration projects in Nicaragua and Panama. In Nicaragua in 2006, the company faced three weeks of protests by workers who were fired from the LimÃģn mine, and operation of the Libertad mine was blamed for pollution of the Rio Mico.
Select Mineral List Type
Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical ElementsGallery:
Other Databases
| Link to USGS MRDS: | 10007911 |
|---|
Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality
Central AmericaRegion
North America
- Central AmericaSubregion
North America Plate
- Central American ArcVolcanic Arc
Panama PlateTectonic Plate
This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to
visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders
for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.