Barricades
Sunday, 25 October 2026 01:45 amThere's a new movie adaptation of Les Mis in theaters right now and I can't decide if the coincidental timing is very good or very bad -- thoughts?
We can “protect” a natural area, but that has implications. What quality is being protected? What does it mean to protect?
It isn’t the presence of “nature” (which is everywhere) but the absence of a particular pattern of destruction. The forcing of the ecosystem into boxes of usefulness. The infinite variations of the landscape are crushed, sanded down, smoothed away. This place is a “yard” this place is a “field” this place is a “parking lot” and their “maintenance” forces them to remain those things.
But it isn’t absence either. In the forest, flowers grow beside the trails that do not grow anywhere else in the forest. The frogs and turtles need the farm ponds dug by the farmers long ago, the bobwhites need the pastures, the lichens love the gravestones in the cemetery. Before that, the groves of plums and pawpaws and hickory trees and white oaks and the lush canebrakes that fed the bison herds were tended by people.
Nature is not human inaction. Nature cannot be protected by leaving it alone; nature cannot be left alone. I see proposals to “set aside” half of Earth for wilderness, and think to myself, “Which half? And how will we let the insects, birds, rivers, plants, aquifers, mountains, and winds know where we draw the boundary lines?” The mosses growing between the bricks of the apartment building are breathing your breath. We are all joined.
We ask “How to make sure humans leave the wilderness alone?” It’s impossible. Instead, we need to ask, “How do we become wild again?”
But that’s not right either. We are wild. We are animals, wild animals. So maybe the question is, “How do we escape captivity?”
But that’s not right either. We are not being conserved ex-situ, instead our captivity, the built environments and ways of life which are clashing with the patterns of other living things, spreads over the globe to capture more and more of the earth.
So the question is really, “How do we make our captivity wild again?”
Most places, right outside our homes, we don’t have a perfectly pristine forest or grassland ecosystem close at hand to “protect.” We have lawns and concrete, drainage ditches that used to be creeks, eroded and dead soils.
“How do I make nature?” No. Nature is still there. Nature is always there. The change, the chaos, the growing, the moving, the happening, that’s Nature.
You look up native plants that help the bees, you make a flower bed…but you’re not quite there. The flower bed is still a flower bed, and the plants were chosen by you, and you pull the the weeds that pop up, and you keep it neat… that is, you make it stay the same. You make it remain the thing that you planned, the thing you expect.
“What is Nature doing in the flower bed?” The weeds are growing where there is space for them to grow. Where the soil has been disturbed, where the plant community has been disrupted, there the weeds arrive. The more you try to destroy them, the more they grow back.
“What are these weeds, and what are they doing here?” So you look it up. Let’s imagine that you’re in the southeastern USA. Seems to be a crabgrass.
“What are you doing here, Crabgrass? What are you up to?” Maybe you learn that many crabgrasses come from Africa, and the seeds of some species are grown for food. Maybe you wonder if the Crabgrass came here with the enslaved people who were forced to come here many years ago. Maybe you observe that the Crabgrass’s tiny hairs collect the dew and keep the soil damp. Maybe you notice how the Crabgrass sprawls out horizontally, covering the bare ground and protecting it. Maybe you notice the seeds sticking to your shoes, and wonder whose shoes carried the seeds here in the first place.
Maybe you wonder it about all the weeds: Where are they from? What peoples know their names? Whose ancestors used them for food, medicine, clothes? Why are they here? What allowed them to thrive? What have the generations and generations of their ancestors been up to all this time, in the ditches, in the flower beds, in the cracks of the pavement?
After an ecosystem is swept away, how do you build it again? You need weeds, you need chaos, you need unpredictability. You need to let it be uncontrolled, to defy you, to surprise you, but you can’t leave it alone. You need to not control, but meddle. You need to plant new stuff, dig stuff up, stomp around in it with your big ol boots, dig holes, try random stuff. You can buy the plants that look pretty and behave nicely, but you need more. You need the seed that grows into the plant you can’t imagine.
The mosses growing between the bricks of the apartment building are breathing your breath. We are all joined.
We ask “How to make sure humans leave the wilderness alone?” It’s impossible. Instead, we need to ask, “How do we become wild again?”
But that’s not right either. We are wild. We are animals, wild animals. So maybe the question is, “How do we escape captivity?”
Those may not be exactly the right questions, but they are still beautiful thoughts – especially in this era of surveillance cameras, A.I. cookie trackers, mega-billionaires buying our political systems, and ICE raids on our cities.
Which are all intra-human, societal, issues, and not what you’ve written about here. But I do think it’s connected. Where to put the new parking lot is a political decision, after all.
And tapping into the existential dread of modern loneliness by asking: “How do we become wild again?” “How do we escape captivity?” may be the best way to seed a little enthusiasm for solving the problems of healthy ecological balance.
How are you doing?
I am okay
2 (40.0%)
I am not okay, but don't need help right now
3 (60.0%)
I could use some help.
0 (0.0%)
How many other humans are you living with?
I am living single
1 (20.0%)
One other person
1 (20.0%)
More than one other person
3 (60.0%)
Anyway, I'm leaving a negative review on "having one hand largely disabled for weeks." Everything takes double the effort and triple the time, then yields half the results.
I'm acquiring a tiny bit more patience with my situation. A tiny bit.

Want to leave a Kudos?
I woke up when D came to bed, went for a pee, and then lay there in the dark realizing that it was probably about time for the first game of the World Series to start.
I can't watch playoff games like I do regular-season ones, despite the exorbitant amounts of money the MLB TV subscription still costs. But I could look up what local radio stations carried the broadcasts and pray that one would work for me online. Luckily, it did. I went with the Milwaukee broadcast, because
a) I want the Brewers to win
and
b) the commercials on the radio make me feel at home. Kwik Trip! Now there's a name I haven't heard in a long time...
The game got exciting very quickly with the Brewers taking a lead to give their crowd some reason to scream so loud I couldn't hear what the announcers were saying any time one of their bats touched the ball, even if it was on its way to a routine out.
I got tired and tried turning the radio off and going back to sleep, but I just lay there and wondered what was happening. It was no use. I'm too excited about this World Series, with its "small markets" (i.e. not New York or L.A.), and its teams misunderstood as "old-school" or "small-ball" but which aren't full of big-name players who get famous fans in the stands.
I think I dozed off in the middle innings (around 3:30 or 4 am), but I was locked back in by the time Trevor Megill was trying to get those last few outs. I heard that double-play call that would've ended the game and it was all I could do not to scream and flail in bed -- I consider it a sign of my devotion to D that I managed to avoid this; it really did seem like a close call -- and then with the agonizing challenge. When the Rays wrenched that last out back, I thought the funniest possible thing would be for them to piss it away again, and they did, and it was just the most delightful outcome for the first game.
And then I did fall back asleep, and slept until 11 -- a total of nine or ten hours of sleep last night overall! just which this baseball intermission. I felt pretty shitty when I woke up -- like a little hungover -- but this was elating in its own way because it was just a reminder of how much fun I'd had. I'll do it again: what's the point of having this upcoming week off work if I can't get excited about baseball in the middle of the night?
D asked me "So what are the implications of this game?" and I think it took me fifteen or twenty minutes to stop talking. Baseball has the most narrativium this side of the Discworld.
Just a quick post to draw your attention to the Vintage Filk Preservation channel on YouTube. Here are some live concert videos from Consonance 2001:
I have been continuing to make my way through the backlog of magazines various organisations have sent me over the last, uh, two years or so (as of today I am CAUGHT UP and I am VERY EXCITED about having thus Engaged In Decluttering). Yesterday's reading included the latest from Imperial, which tragically for me was a Special Issue on "AI".
The point at which I felt relieved of all sense of obligation to finish reading the thing was when they cited Elon Musk's technical opinions like they were in any way shape or form relevant to any serious conversation, which is also the point at which I started ranting at A, which is in turn the point at which A went "what's...... an artificial general intelligence?" and I responded with a rant about the desperate escalation of marketing spin resulting from the misapplication of "artificial intelligence" and that reminded me that I wanted a way to talk about "generative AI" that didn't involve calling it "AI" but that didn't lump a bunch of stuff that isn't directly or primarily about language under the heading of LLM, and in my flailing I wound up uttering the phrase "generative machine learning models or, if you will, MLMs--"
-- and actually yes I am delighted with the acronym clash with multi-level marketing and I will be keeping it. It is of course immediately obvious why marketing has tried desperately to avoid use of this (as far as I can tell actually not horrendously inaccurate in technical terms) nomenclature/summarising phrase, but.
Generative MLMs. Yeah. I'm keeping it.
Hi.
It's the first day of early in-person voting, a text to my. phone this morning reminded me. Somehow I had awakened almost an hour before I'd want to be up and at the computer, and I didn't fall back asleep, even while taking it easy after that. And now I'm up and awake and ready to have the rest of my Saturday.
During my meeting I found a message in my spem folder from my dead ex's sister with a wrap-up of the memorial service I didn't end up attending. Looking through its offerings I wasn't regretful I'd not attended, so that was nice. They did put the one song I suggested---which she herself'd picked out for my mother's memorial---on the playlist, but didn't include any of the photos I sent in the extensive slide show that played, although there was one picture of me & her there, taken by one of them, on the "cruise from hell", as she and I jokingly called it afterwards---the cruise during which I was clearly not accepted as the partner of one of the family's children.
The World Series between the Milwaukee Brewers and the Tampa Bay (No Longer Devil) Rays has begun. I'd cheered for each of these teams through the playoffs. It's good baseball. No Yankees in sight. And my old fave O, Ced, will probably get a few at-bats and some innings in center field.
Knee shots next week. It's been pretty bad for this last stretch. And my sleep has been so f-ed up. Somehow yesterday my sleeping in until 1:00 and working the afternoon from home has left me pretty good today, after a regular mediocre time in bed asleep last night.
Maybe I'll go vote to get in on the Day One excitement. Could even take my computer and do some work at the library branch.
Got new glasses. 2 pair, but both "fun". Now I'm self-conscious that they're too much for ordinary blend-in moments, or perhaps that I'm not always up for living up to their whimsy. But that's okay.
Just sent the FOIA request for the fire dept report on the visit to my house when the power lines broke and fire raged for hours. Hoping to get DTE to respond by fixing the problem, finally, and this time covering some of my costs.
Planning to write to my ex-therapist today. Had been thinking of sending a postcard every month on the monthiversary of her retirement, but when the first month rolled around I wasn't up for it. In a dark space.
I don't know why I'm in a less dark space today, but thank you, life, for it, and for this day.
Now I want somebody to write the actual history (now that Virago has been done, and the history of Silver Moon bookshop, is anyone doing Pandora Press or Sisterwrite on Upper Street?), given that websites can vanish, but this is good to be going on with: The Women’s Press (1977-2003): and to this global online, ongoing ARCHIVE. The Women's Press were perhaps rather more demotic in their selection of materials than Virago and had strong sff and crime lines, I am sure I am not the only one who still has their distinctive black and white striped spines adorning my shelves.
***
While as long-time flaneuse of Fitzrovia I am saddened by what appears to be the demise of Pollock's Toy Museum at that historic location, though it seems to still be flourishing in Leadenhall Market, and, of all places, Croydon, Persephone Books are apparently moving in to those premises - having moved out of the metropls to Bath some years ago.
***
Gay Print Culture: A History of Gay Magazines in Mexico, Canada, and the United States:
I became interested in the history of gay periodicals in 2015, as an M.A. student at the University of Toronto. My readings and coursework at that time focused mostly on the histories of gender, sexuality, and LGBTQ+ activism, and they sparked my curiosity about the role of print media in the formation of gay identities and communities.
