I saved, or thought I had, a couple of Twitter threads anent the role of publishing in the formation of the literary canon (in the other browser), only one of which actually appears in my tabs and turns out to be from last year.
But anyway, that had me thinking that well yes and well no, and what about V Woolf self-publishing by setting type herself as occupational therapy, even if the Hogarth Press rapidly expanded beyond that rather kitchen-table operation. And what about J Joyce's Ulysses being nurtured into print by Sylvia Beach at Shakespeare & Co with French typesetters who made Joyce's linguistic playfulness even more bizarre, and moreover being a work you might get confiscated at Customs if you brought it across the Channel? As well as earlier systems of publishing by subscription (C18th Kickstarter/Patreon?) or paying a bookseller on a profit-sharing basis etc, and how many of those works now nestle in obscurity in libraries while a few are considered Gems of Litrachur...
My attention was also drawn today to the British Library Women's Writing Series, which I would be more prepossessed by if I had not looked at the titles in it and frowned and considered that several of them had already been Brought To The Attention Of The Reading Public by Virago or Persephone or other similar endeavours. (Why does no-one ever bring back GB Stern? - except for The Matriarch, sigh.)
(F Tennyson Jesse's A Pin to See The Peepshow is hardly a neglected classic. Though I am aghast that the 1973 TV serial version does not appear to be available on DVD - infamy! infamy!)
(I must say kudos to Furrowed Middlebrow because as far as I can tell they are not ploughing a field already cleared by someone else.)
I also came across today this lament for the Mass Market Paperback (a minute's silence, please).
But that made me think about publishers - as it might be, Allen Lane of blessed memory and Penguin Books - who set up an enterprise and everyone tells them they're mad and it will never take off. (And of course now having shelves of Period Penguins is one of the marks of Poncey Interior Design, no?)
But they clearly owed a lot to his taste and were really eclectic, and maybe one sees parallels with other more recent innovative enterprises that after a bit Ye Corporates take over and it all gets a bit bland and homogenous...
What Penguins and other MMPs also had was not just Other Books by the same author but usually other books of a related nature by the publisher listed at the back. Useful.
***
In other news, I am entirely prepossessed by Molton Brown's Vetiver and Grapefruit Bath and Shower Gel
no subject
Date: 2021-08-24 06:49 pm (UTC)I have so, so many MMPB in my collection.
no subject
Date: 2021-08-24 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-08-25 03:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-08-24 07:37 pm (UTC)This had a bad effect on my writing career in traditional publishing, and I am not the only one by a long shot.
P.
no subject
Date: 2021-08-24 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-08-25 03:43 am (UTC)Nearly all the books I had as a teenager and young adult were MMPBs -- and that was when I could pay for a big hardback with a twenty and get change back! I remember being stuck with Signet editions of Dickens because the Penguin paperback editions were slightly more expensive. And people say "oh it's all on Gutenberg now" but even for that you need an ereader. My first copy of Tender is the Night was this really beat-up paperback I got from the Santa Fe Public Library for a quarter. I still have it.
tl;dr yeah no it wasn't the Kindle what done it
no subject
Date: 2021-08-28 05:25 pm (UTC)And, as you say, one of the selling points of the mass market paperback was to recommend to others something that they also might enjoy, then we have many and varied tools that can do this, and link you directly to where you might purchase such things.
no subject
Date: 2021-08-28 05:44 pm (UTC)